On 3/18/2016 7:54 PM,
[email protected] wrote:
Initially, I was quite disappointed when the switch to digital began, but had become bored with television anyway so in a way it didn't matter. When local stations threw the switch with some fanfare that Friday afternoon, my old analog set went to snow
and I resolved that I wasn't in a hurry to get a converter box.
Anyway, after a couple of months, I decided to use one of the $40 government coupons to purchase a converter and used it to buy one at a SEARS store in a nearby shopping mall.
Originally, I was impressed with digital subchannels but was split down the middle (50/50) as to whether they were worth the loss of channels that I used to be able to get in the analog era but were not coming in digitally.
Now it will only be a memory how you could still manage to watch a show through the snowy picture of bad reception since digital tuning is all or nothing at all.
I thought the Associated Press report on the switch to digital from correspondent Ross Simpson raised an eyebrow. It was available on YouTube as recently as December 2015 (watch?v=1ovqj3RJEuE)
I agree. I still prefer analog to be able to watch for weak signals. :(
--
"Only two great groups of animals, men and ants, indulge in highly
organized mass warfare." --Charles H. Maskins
Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see
this signature correctly.
/\___/\ Ant(Dude) @
http://antfarm.ma.cx (Personal Web Site)
/ /\ /\ \ Ant's Quality Foraged Links:
http://aqfl.net
| |o o| |
\ _ / If crediting, then use Ant nickname and AQFL URL/link.
( ) Chop ANT from its address if e-mailing privately.
Ant is currently not listening to any songs on this computer.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)