• Re: Sermon On The Mount

    From %@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Thu Apr 4 13:02:26 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus? Because he
    had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated >>>>>>>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but
    many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large
    part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic
    his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be considered
    controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially
    radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of >>>>>>>> many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left
    views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>>>>>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving >>>>>>>>> capitalism. >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many >>>>>>>>> examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to
    excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular
    figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>>
    responsible that >>>> we separate Jesus�?? relationship with money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit
    financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations
    of his words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about
    Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like
    sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >>>>>>>> referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We can also see >>>>>>>
    that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people
    who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as
    women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with
    leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they
    should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that
    they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew
    21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches
    him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give
    up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> >
    poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through the eye >>>>>>>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>>>>>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>>>>>>> NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would have to stop >>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly >>>>>>>>> incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>>>>>>> people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>>>> wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and
    hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Despite the context and direct nature of his
    statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite
    differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> >
    Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Under capitalism, interpretations favored by
    rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>>>>>> created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >>>>>>>>>>>> His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often
    downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is >>>>>>>>> home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue.
    All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>>>>>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and
    it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be
    presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

    An idea as simple as �??love your neighbors�?�
    can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> >
    understand Jesus�?? >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about
    their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they
    align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial
    version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start >>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>>>>>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone
    books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the >>>>>>>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>>>>>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament. He wants you to understand >>>>>>>>> and follow him. It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats >>>>>>>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>>>>>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>>>>>>> eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of
    it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked >>>>>>>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted. >>>>>>>>>>
    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have
    become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"?
    "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.


    is that when you and fat fuck chad leap frog over each other
    in order to act a fool first, or when you butt bang chad and
    call him a bitch

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 10:30:15 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    In article <[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115 $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>> [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus? Because he
    had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304>
    --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated
    for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but
    many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large
    part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic
    his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be considered
    controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of
    many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving
    capitalism. >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many
    examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to
    excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular
    figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate Jesus�?? relationship with money
    from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations
    of his words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like
    sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now
    referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We can also see >>>>>>>
    that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people
    who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as
    women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they
    should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that
    they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew
    21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches
    him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give
    up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> > poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through the eye >>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>> NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would have to stop >>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly
    incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make
    people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> >
    wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and
    hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers?

    Despite the context and direct nature of his
    statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite
    differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> >
    Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions.
    Under capitalism, interpretations favored by rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>> created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesus�?? >>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against.
    His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often
    downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is >>>> home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>>
    Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue.
    All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and
    it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

    An idea as simple as �??love your neighbors�?�
    can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> > understand Jesus�?? >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they
    align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial
    version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible. >> >


    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start
    reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn.

    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone
    books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught?

    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the
    many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament. He wants you to understand >>>> and follow him. It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats
    shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride!



    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>> eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of
    it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked
    shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted.

    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.



    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"? "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 13:10:37 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    % wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    ���� Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?� Because he >>>>>> had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>>��� too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ������ --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated >>>>>>>>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but
    many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large
    part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic >>>>>> his virtues.

    ���� Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be considered
    controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially >>>>>> radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of >>>>>>>>> many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left
    views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>>>>>>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving >>>>>>>>>> capitalism.� >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many >>>>>>>>>> examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to
    excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular
    figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>> >>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate Jesus�??� relationship with money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit
    financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations >>>>>> of his words.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>���� We can read stories about
    Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like
    sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >>>>>>>>> referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We can also see >>>>>>>
    that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people >>>>>> who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as
    women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with
    leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities.� >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they >>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that
    they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew
    21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables.� >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches >>>>>> him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give
    up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> > >>>>>> poor.

    ���� �??It is easier for a camel to go through the eye >>>>>>>>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>>>>>>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>>>>>>>> NIV.

    ���� This notion that a rich person would have to stop >>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly >>>>>>>>>> incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>>>>>>>> people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>>>>> wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and
    hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    ���� Despite the context and direct nature of his >>>>>>>>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite
    differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> >
    Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ���� Under capitalism, interpretations favored by >>>>>> rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>>>>>>> created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >>>>>>>>>>>>> His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often
    downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>��� SIUE is >>>>>>>>>> home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue.
    All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>>>>>>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and >>>>>> it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be
    presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

    ���� An idea as simple as �??love your neighbors�?�
    can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> >
    understand Jesus�??� >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about >>>>>> their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they
    align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>>>>>>> version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start >>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>> it.� Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>>>>>>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone >>>>>>>>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the >>>>>>>>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>>>>>>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.� He wants you to understand >>>>>>>>>> and follow him.� It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats >>>>>>>>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>>>>>>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>>>>>>>> eat, Chad.� >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of >>>>>> it.

    ��� >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked >>>>>>>>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted. >>>>>>>>>>>
    �� >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    �� only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    � >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have >>>>> become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"?
    "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing sissy... >>>
    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.


    is that when you and fat fuck chad leap frog over each other
    in order to act a fool first, or when you butt bang chad and
    call him a bitch


    What did the horny frog say?

    Rubbit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Anton Ray Eaks@21:1/5 to Ted on Thu Apr 4 13:14:48 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Ted wrote:
    % wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
         Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?  Because he >>>>>>> had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>>    too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated >>>>>>>>>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but >>>>>>> many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large >>>>>>> part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic >>>>>>> his virtues.

         Many of Jesusâ?? ideas would be considered >>>>>>>>>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially >>>>>>> radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of >>>>>>>>>> many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left >>>>>>> views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesusâ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>>>>>>>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism.  >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many >>>>>>>>>>> examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to
    excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular
    figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>> >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate Jesusâ??  relationship with money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit
    financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations >>>>>>> of his words.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     We can read stories about >>>>>>> Jesusâ?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like >>>>>>> sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >>>>>>>>>> referred to as >>>> â??communion.â? We can also see >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people >>>>>>> who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as
    women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with >>>>>>> leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities.  >> > >>>>>>>>>> He >>>>>>> tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that >>>>>>> they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew >>>>>>> 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables.  >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches >>>>>>> him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give >>>>>>> up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> > >>>>>>> poor.

         â??It is easier for a camel to go through the eye
    of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>>>>>>>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>>>>>>>>> NIV.

         This notion that a rich person would have to stop
    being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly >>>>>>>>>>> incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>>>>>>>>> people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>>>>>> wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and
    hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
         Despite the context and direct nature of his >>>>>>>>>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite >>>>>>>>>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      Under capitalism, interpretations favored by >>>>>>> rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>>>>>>>> created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesusâ?? >>>>>>>>>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often
    downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>    SIUE is >>>>>>>>>>> home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue. >>>>>>> All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>>>>>>>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and >>>>>>> it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be
    presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

         An idea as simple as â??love your neighborsâ?
    can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> >
    understand Jesusâ??  >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about >>>>>>> their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they
    align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start >>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>> it.  Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>>>>>>>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone >>>>>>>>>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the >>>>>>>>>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>>>>>>>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.  He wants you to understand >>>>>>>>>>> and follow him.  It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats >>>>>>>>>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>>>>>>>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>>>>>>>>> eat, Chad.  >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of >>>>>>> it.

        >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked >>>>>>>>>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted. >>>>>>>>>>>>
       >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


       only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

      >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have >>>>>> become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"?
    "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.

    ;
    is that when you and fat fuck chad leap frog over each other
    in order to act a fool first, or when you butt bang chad and
    call him a bitch


    What did the horny frog say?

    Rubbit.


    Why do Frogs make for good sex toys?

    They’re ribbited for your pleasure.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 4 13:44:06 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    In article <uumn68$24cp1$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    % wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>> Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    ���� Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?� Because he >>>>>>> had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>>��� too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ������ --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated >>>>>>>>>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but >>>>>>> many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large >>>>>>> part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic >>>>>>> his virtues.

    ���� Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be considered >>>>>>>>>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially >>>>>>> radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of >>>>>>>>>> many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left >>>>>>> views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>>>>>>>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism.� >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many >>>>>>>>>>> examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to >>>>>>> excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and >>>>>>> attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular >>>>>>> figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>> >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate Jesus�??� relationship with money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit
    financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations >>>>>>> of his words.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>���� We can read stories about >>>>>>> Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like >>>>>>> sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >>>>>>>>>> referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We can also see >>>>>>> >>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people >>>>>>> who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as >>>>>>> women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with >>>>>>> leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities.� >> > >>>>>>>>>> He >>>>>>> tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that >>>>>>> they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew >>>>>>> 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables.� >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches >>>>>>> him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give >>>>>>> up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> > >>>>>>> poor.

    ���� �??It is easier for a camel to go through the eye >>>>>>>>>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>>>>>>>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>>>>>>>>> NIV.

    ���� This notion that a rich person would have to stop >>>>>>>>>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly >>>>>>>>>>> incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>>>>>>>>> people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>>>>>> wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and >>>>>>> hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    ���� Despite the context and direct nature of his >>>>>>>>>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite >>>>>>>>>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> > >>>>>>>>>>> Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ���� Under capitalism, interpretations favored by >>>>>>> rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>>>>>>>> created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often >>>>>>>>>>> downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>��� SIUE is >>>>>>>>>>> home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue. >>>>>>> All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>>>>>>>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and >>>>>>> it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be >>>>>>> presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

    ���� An idea as simple as �??love your neighbors�?� >>>>>>> can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> >
    understand Jesus�??� >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about >>>>>>> their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they >>>>>>> align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>>>>>>>> version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible.� >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start >>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>> it.� Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>>>>>>>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone >>>>>>>>>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the >>>>>>>>>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>>>>>>>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.� He wants you to understand >>>>>>>>>>> and follow him.� It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats >>>>>>>>>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>>>>>>>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>>>>>>>>> eat, Chad.� >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of >>>>>>> it.

    ��� >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked >>>>>>>>>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted. >>>>>>>>>>>>
    �� >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    �� only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    � >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have >>>>>> become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"?
    "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.


    is that when you and fat fuck chad leap frog over each other
    in order to act a fool first, or when you butt bang chad and
    call him a bitch


    What did the horny frog say?

    Rubbit.


    Why do Frogs make for good sex toys?

    They?re ribbited for your pleasure.


    It's funny that condoms are ribbed for her pleasure,
    because in Genesis, God ribbed Adam for Eve.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ted@21:1/5 to Anton Ray Eaks on Thu Apr 4 13:36:51 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Anton Ray Eaks wrote:
    Ted wrote:
    % wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>, [email protected] >>>>> Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
         Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?  Because he
    had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>>    too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>        --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often emulated >>>>>>>>>>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but >>>>>>>> many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large >>>>>>>> part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to mimic >>>>>>>> his virtues.

         Many of Jesusâ?? ideas would be considered >>>>>>>>>>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> > especially >>>>>>>> radical, >>>> aligning less with the >>>>>>> conservative views of >>>>>>>>>>> many of >>>> his followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left >>>>>>>> views we now >>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of Jesusâ?? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his economic >>>>>>>>>>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of preserving >>>>>>>>>>>> capitalism.  >>>>>>> American history has given us >> > many >>>>>>>>>>>> examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to >>>>>>>> excuse >>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and >>>>>>>> attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>> popular >>>>>>>> figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >> > only >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate Jesusâ??  relationship with money >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from >>>> that of any churches who stand to profit
    financially from >>>>>>> >>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations >>>>>>>> of his words.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>     We can read stories about >>>>>>>> Jesusâ?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like >>>>>>>> sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >>>>>>>>>>> referred to as >>>> â??communion.â? We can also see >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular interest in the needs of people >>>>>>>> who >>>>>>> his >>>> society would >> > rather abandon such as >>>>>>>> women who had >>>>>>> >>>> committed adultery and those >> > with >>>>>>>> leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities.  >> > >>>>>>>>>> He >>>>>>>> tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on earth and that >>>>>>>> they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>> and money. In Matthew >>>>>>>> 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>> people using a >> >
    temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>> starts flipping
    tables.  >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches >>>>>>>> him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give >>>>>>>> up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> > >>>>>>>> poor.

         â??It is easier for a camel to go through the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eye
    of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is rich to enter >>>>>>>>>>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,� Jesus said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>>>>>>>>>> NIV.

         This notion that a rich person would have to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop
    being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is explicitly >>>>>>>>>>>> incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>>>>>>>>>> people choose between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and >>>>>>>> hopes >>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his followers? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
         Despite the context and direct nature of his >>>>>>>>>>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite >>>>>>>>>>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>> possessions. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>      Under capitalism, interpretations favored by >>>>>>>> rich >>>> people are >>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This >>>>>>>> has
    created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesusâ?? >>>>>>>>>>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> His attempts to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often >>>>>>>>>>>> downplayed, and this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody is perfect.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>    SIUE is
    home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope will >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this issue. >>>>>>>> All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or otherwise, should >>>>>>>>>>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >> > sources.
    Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>> without an agenda, and >>>>>>>> it >> > is >>>> alarmingly common for >>>>>>> information to be >>>>>>>> presented in >>>> deceitful >> > ways.

         An idea as simple as â??love your neighborsâ?
    can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact opposite
    message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking to >> >
    understand Jesusâ??  >>>> words will think >>>>>>> critically about >>>>>>>> their own >> > >>>> ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they >>>>>>>> align more closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible.  >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even start >>>>>>>>>>>> reading >>>>>>>> it.  Very brief posts, otoh, almost always get >>>>>>>>>>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing to learn. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let alone >>>>>>>>>>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being taught? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because of the >>>>>>>>>>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the simple >>>>>>>>>>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.  He wants you to understand >>>>>>>>>>>> and follow him.  It is >>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that he eats >>>>>>>>>>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted, that was >>>>>>>>>>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how much shit I can >>>>>>>>>>>> eat, Chad.  >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud of >>>>>>>> it.

        >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he liked >>>>>>>>>>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind ted. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
       >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


       only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

      >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You have >>>>>>> become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then? "ratboy"?
    "shitstink"? "pukester"?


    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!


    My #1 frogging fan is back. What a coward.

    ;
    is that when you and fat fuck chad leap frog over each other
    in order to act a fool first, or when you butt bang chad and
    call him a bitch
    ;
    ;
    What did the horny frog say?

    Rubbit.


    Why do Frogs make for good sex toys?

    They’re ribbited for your pleasure.


    Never get tired of froggy style!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Skeeter@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 5 10:51:05 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    In article <17c34d6475b325c8$147542$2601257$eadde062
    @news.thecubenet.com>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <AQCPN.126209$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article
    <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article

    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]
    , >>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?
    Because he had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>




    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304>
    --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often
    emulated >>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy
    and love, but many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem
    to miss a very large part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>>
    their attempts >> > to mimic his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be
    considered >>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern
    world, but his attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>>
    would be >> > especially radical, >>>> aligning less with
    the >>>>>>> conservative views of >> > many of >>>> his
    followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left views we now
    call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of
    Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or
    undermine his economic >>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in
    the >> > interest of preserving >>>> capitalism. >>>>>>>
    American history has given us >> > many >>>> examples of
    Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to excuse
    harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>>
    popular figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is
    only >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate
    Jesus�?? relationship with money >> >>>>>>>> from >>>>
    that of any churches who stand to profit financially from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations of his
    words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about
    Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> >
    like sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>>
    tradition now >> > referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We
    can also see >>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular
    interest in the needs of people who >>>>>>> his >>>>
    society would >> > rather abandon such as women who had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed adultery and those >> > with leprosy
    or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that
    they >>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on
    earth and that they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>>
    and money. In Matthew 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>>>>>>>>> people using a >> > temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts flipping tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In
    Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches him for instruction
    and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give up all his
    possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> >
    poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through
    the eye >>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who
    is rich to enter >>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus
    said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>> NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would
    have to stop >>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to
    follow him is explicitly >>>> incompatible with >>>>>>>
    capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>> people choose
    between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>> wealth
    unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and hopes >>>>>>>>>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his
    followers?

    Despite the context and direct nature of
    his >>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted
    quite >>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>>
    influential >> > >>>> Christians who have yet to give up
    their >>>>>>> possessions. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Under
    capitalism, interpretations favored by rich >>>> people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>
    created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among
    Jesus�?? >>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>>
    warning against. >> >>>>> His attempts to redistribute
    power are >>>>>>> often >>>> downplayed, and this >> > is
    interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody
    is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is >>>> home to a large
    Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>
    Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope
    will >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of
    this issue. All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian
    or otherwise, should >>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations
    of our >> > sources. Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an agenda, and it >> > is >>>> alarmingly
    common for >>>>>>> information to be presented in >>>>
    deceitful >> > ways.

    An idea as simple as �??love your
    neighbors�?� can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the
    exact opposite message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>>
    readers seeking to >> > understand Jesus�?? >>>> words
    will think >>>>>>> critically about their own >> > >>>>
    ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they align more
    closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>
    version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even
    start >>>> reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh,
    almost always get >>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing
    to learn.

    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let
    alone >>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was
    being taught?

    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because
    of the >>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and
    follow the simple >>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.
    He wants you to understand >>>> and follow him. It is
    your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that
    he eats >>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted,
    that was >>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man
    what a ride!



    I remember when you used to brag about how much
    shit I can >>>> eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting,
    but you were proud of it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he
    liked >>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind
    ted.

    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted.
    You have become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then?
    "ratboy"? "shitstink"? "pukester"?



    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!




    It's ratboy frogging his superior Skeeter.


    That shall be his nickname from now on.



    LOL. Good call. It suits him.


    kiss kiss

    https://tinyurl.com/tardlet LOL!


    More Chad rerun.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From %@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Fri Apr 5 14:49:52 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <17c34d75f63bad6b$147543$2601257$eadde062
    @news.thecubenet.com>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <egDPN.132661$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    ratboy frogging Ted wrote:

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article
    <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] says...

    In article
    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected]en >>>>>>>>>>>> et.c om>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article
    <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus? Because >>>>>> he had >>>>>>become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke.



    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who
    is often emulated
    for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy and love, but >>>>>> many >>>>>>of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem to miss a very large >>>>>> part of >>>>>>his teachings in >>>>>>> their attempts >> > to
    mimic his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be considered >>>>>>>>>>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern world, but his
    attitudes >>>>>>regarding economics >>>>>>> would be >> >
    especially radical, >>>>>>aligning less with the >>>>>>>
    conservative views of >> > many of >>>>>>his followers and more
    with >>>>>>> the far-left views we now >>>>>>call >> > communist. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    However, the mainstream
    interpretations of Jesus�??
    philosophy seem >> > to ignore or undermine his
    economic >>>>>>ideals, >>>>>>> most often in the >> > interest of
    preserving >>>>>>capitalism. >>>>>>> American history has given
    us >> > many >>>>>>examples of Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations
    being used to excuse >>>>>>>>>harmful institutions >>>>>>> such
    as slavery and attempt to >>>>>>de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>>>>>>>> popular figures such as >>>>>>Martin Luther King Jr. It
    is >> > only >>>>>>> responsible that >>>>>>we separate Jesus�??
    relationship with money >> >>>>>>>> from
    that of any churches who stand to profit financially
    from

    more >> > capitalist interpretations of his words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about Jesus�?? emphasis
    on >>>>>>communal >>>>>>> practices, >> > like sharing meals and
    labor and >>>>>>starting the >>>>>>> tradition now >> > referred
    to as >>>>>>�??communion.�?� We can also see >>>>>>> that he has
    a >> > >>>>>>particular interest in the needs of people who >>>>>>>>>>>>> his >>>>>>society would >> > rather abandon such as women
    who had >>>>>>> >>>>>>committed adultery and those >> > with
    leprosy or physical >>>>>>>>>>>>>disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>>
    He tells his followers to >>>>>>forgive their debtors, that they >>>>>>>>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>>>>treasures on earth and
    that they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>>>>and money. In
    Matthew 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>>>>people using a >>>>>>>>> temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>> >>>>>>starts
    flipping tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In Matthew 19, a rich >>>>>>man
    approaches him for instruction and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells
    him to give up all his possessions and give the >>>>>>>
    money to >>>>>>the >> > poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through
    the eye >>>>>>of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who is
    rich to enter >>>>>>the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus said in >>>>>>>>> Matthew 19:24
    NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would have to >>>>>> stop >>>>>>being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to follow him is
    explicitly >>>>>>incompatible with >>>>>>> capitalist >> >
    thinking. Why make >>>>>>people choose between >>>>>>> following
    him and pursuing >> > >>>>>>wealth unless he dislikes the >>>>>>>
    effects of wealth and hopes >>>>>>to >> > counteract them in some
    way >>>>>>> by encouraging an >>>>>>alternative lifestyle >> >
    among his followers?

    Despite the context and direct nature of his >>>>>>>>>>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted quite >>>>>>>>>>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>> influential >> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Christians who have yet to give up their >>>>>>>
    possessions. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Under capitalism,
    interpretations favored by rich >>>>>>people are >>>>>>> given >> >>>>>>> more of a platform. This has >>>>>>created the exact type of >>>>>>>>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among Jesus�?? >>>>>>fans that he devoted
    so much time to >>>>>>> warning against. >> >>>>>>>His attempts
    to redistribute power are >>>>>>> often >>>>>>downplayed, and
    this >> > is interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>>>>about
    how nobody is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is
    home to a large Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christian organizations, whose members I
    sincerely hope will
    avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of this
    issue. All >>>>>>of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian or
    otherwise, should >>>>>>question the >>>>>>> motivations of our >>>>>>>>> sources. Information >>>>>>is never presented >>>>>>>
    without an agenda, and it >> > is >>>>>>alarmingly common for >>>>>>>>>>>>> information to be presented in >>>>>>deceitful >> > ways. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
    An idea as simple as �??love your
    neighbors�?� can >>>>>>be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the exact
    opposite message. I >>>>>>hope that any >>>>>>> readers seeking
    to >> > understand Jesus�?? >>>>>>words will think >>>>>>>
    critically about their own >> > >>>>>>ideologies as well and
    whether >>>>>>> they align more closely >>>>>>with the >> >
    whitewashed commercial >>>>>>> version that grants >>>>>>wishes
    or the radical >> > political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in
    the Bible. >> >

    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is
    not to even start
    reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh, almost always
    get
    read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were
    willing to learn.

    If you were unwilling to read a few
    words, let alone
    books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was being
    taught?

    Jesus and the New Testament were needed
    because of the
    many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and follow the
    simple >>>>>>rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament. He wants you to
    understand >>>>>>and follow him. It is >>>>>>> your choice. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that he eats
    shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ted, that was
    back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man what a ride! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>


    I remember when you used to brag about how
    much shit I can
    eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting, but you were proud
    of it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told
    him he liked
    shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick
    mind ted.

    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're
    not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff


    Chad is severely demented.

    >
    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns


    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted. You
    have become like Rudy. Useless.




    Give Rudy a few LOL's Skeeter, it's as good as a reach around!


    Here's some good news for you, ratboy:

    https://nationaltoday.com/world-rat-day/



    Watch because he changes the follow ups to alt.idiots sometimes. I
    guess so the rest can't see us slapping him silly. I found this one
    there.


    Thanks Skeeter. Yeah, he catches me on that often. No doubt that's the
    reason.

    >
    http://tinyurl.com/peescent

    He made you rerun.


    your two surviving brain cells are on an endless rerun loop, tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From %@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Fri Apr 5 14:48:02 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <17c34d6475b325c8$147542$2601257$eadde062
    @news.thecubenet.com>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <AQCPN.126209$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article
    <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article

    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> , >>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?
    Because he had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>




    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often
    emulated >>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy >>>>>>>>> and love, but many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem
    to miss a very large part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>>
    their attempts >> > to mimic his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be
    considered >>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern
    world, but his attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>>
    would be >> > especially radical, >>>> aligning less with
    the >>>>>>> conservative views of >> > many of >>>> his
    followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left views we now >>>>>>>>>>>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of
    Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or
    undermine his economic >>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in
    the >> > interest of preserving >>>> capitalism. >>>>>>>
    American history has given us >> > many >>>> examples of
    Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to excuse >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>>
    popular figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate
    Jesus�?? relationship with money >> >>>>>>>> from >>>>
    that of any churches who stand to profit financially from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations of his
    words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about
    Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> >
    like sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>>
    tradition now >> > referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We
    can also see >>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular
    interest in the needs of people who >>>>>>> his >>>>
    society would >> > rather abandon such as women who had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed adultery and those >> > with leprosy
    or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that
    they >>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on
    earth and that they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>>
    and money. In Matthew 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>>>>>>>>>>> people using a >> > temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts flipping tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In
    Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches him for instruction
    and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give up all his
    possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> >
    poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through >>>>>>>>> the eye >>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who
    is rich to enter >>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus
    said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>> NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would
    have to stop >>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to
    follow him is explicitly >>>> incompatible with >>>>>>>
    capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>> people choose
    between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>> wealth
    unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and hopes >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his
    followers?

    Despite the context and direct nature of >>>>>>>>> his >>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted
    quite >>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>>
    influential >> > >>>> Christians who have yet to give up
    their >>>>>>> possessions. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Under
    capitalism, interpretations favored by rich >>>> people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>
    created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among
    Jesus�?? >>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>>
    warning against. >> >>>>> His attempts to redistribute
    power are >>>>>>> often >>>> downplayed, and this >> > is
    interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody
    is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is >>>> home to a large
    Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>
    Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope
    will >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of
    this issue. All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian
    or otherwise, should >>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations
    of our >> > sources. Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an agenda, and it >> > is >>>> alarmingly
    common for >>>>>>> information to be presented in >>>>
    deceitful >> > ways.

    An idea as simple as �??love your
    neighbors�?� can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the
    exact opposite message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>>
    readers seeking to >> > understand Jesus�?? >>>> words
    will think >>>>>>> critically about their own >> > >>>>
    ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they align more
    closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>
    version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even
    start >>>> reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh,
    almost always get >>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing
    to learn.

    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let
    alone >>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was
    being taught?

    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because
    of the >>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and
    follow the simple >>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.
    He wants you to understand >>>> and follow him. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that
    he eats >>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted,
    that was >>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man
    what a ride!



    I remember when you used to brag about how much
    shit I can >>>> eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting,
    but you were proud of it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he
    liked >>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind
    ted.

    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're >>>>>>>>>>>>> not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted.
    You have become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then?
    "ratboy"? "shitstink"? "pukester"?



    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!




    It's ratboy frogging his superior Skeeter.


    That shall be his nickname from now on.



    LOL. Good call. It suits him.

    >
    kiss kiss

    https://tinyurl.com/tardlet LOL!


    More Chad rerun.


    is chad also a trailer park pissbum like you are, tony

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From %@21:1/5 to Skeeter on Fri Apr 5 15:56:15 2024
    XPost: alt.atheism

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article <17c34d6475b325c8$147542$2601257$eadde062
    @news.thecubenet.com>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <AQCPN.126209$[email protected]>, [email protected]
    says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <jSnPN.762250$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] Ted says...

    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <17c2dc96aff8594a$169751$3716115
    $[email protected]>, [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article
    <660d9859$0$3711207$[email protected]>, >>
    [email protected] says...

    In article <uuhjee$3ruce$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    Skeeter wrote:
    In article
    <[email protected]>, >>>>>
    [email protected] says...

    In article

    <17c22d00da46064a$96254$3081049$[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> , >>>> [email protected] says...

    Ted wrote:
    Skeeter wrote:

    In article <%SjON.762036$p%[email protected]>,
    [email protected] >>>>> says...

    David LaRue wrote:

    "Ted" <[email protected]> wrote in
    news:wjhON.99871$[email protected]:

    % wrote:

    Voice of Authority wrote:
    Why did the Romans crucify Jesus?
    Because he had >>>> become >>>>>>>>>>>> too woke. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>




    <https://twitter.com/DougJBalloon/status/1774230983350362304> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --bks


    He was also a Communist.

    Jesus of Nazareth is a figure who is often
    emulated >>>> for his >>>>>>>>>> emphasis on kindness, mercy >>>>>>>>> and love, but many >>>> of his >>>>>>> disciples >> > seem
    to miss a very large part of >>>> his teachings in >>>>>>>
    their attempts >> > to mimic his virtues.

    Many of Jesus�?? ideas would be
    considered >>>> controversial in >>>>>>> the >> > modern
    world, but his attitudes >>>> regarding economics >>>>>>>
    would be >> > especially radical, >>>> aligning less with
    the >>>>>>> conservative views of >> > many of >>>> his
    followers and more with >>>>>>> the far-left views we now >>>>>>>>>>>>> call >> > communist.

    However, the mainstream interpretations of
    Jesus�?? >>>>>>>>>>> philosophy seem >> > to ignore or
    undermine his economic >>>> ideals, >>>>>>> most often in
    the >> > interest of preserving >>>> capitalism. >>>>>>>
    American history has given us >> > many >>>> examples of
    Biblical >>>>>>> interpretations being used to excuse >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> harmful institutions >>>>>>> such as slavery and
    attempt to >>>> de-radicalize >> > the image of >>>>>>>
    popular figures such as >>>> Martin Luther King Jr. It is >>>>>>>>>>>> only >>>>>>> responsible that >>>> we separate
    Jesus�?? relationship with money >> >>>>>>>> from >>>>
    that of any churches who stand to profit financially from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more >> > capitalist interpretations of his
    words. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> We can read stories about
    Jesus�?? emphasis on >>>> communal >>>>>>> practices, >> >
    like sharing meals and labor and >>>> starting the >>>>>>>
    tradition now >> > referred to as >>>> �??communion.�?� We
    can also see >>>>>>> that he has a >> > >>>> particular
    interest in the needs of people who >>>>>>> his >>>>
    society would >> > rather abandon such as women who had >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed adultery and those >> > with leprosy
    or physical >>>>>>>>>>> disabilities. >> > >>>>>>>>>> He
    tells his followers to >>>> forgive their debtors, that
    they >>>>>>> should >> > not store up >>>> treasures on
    earth and that they cannot >>>>>>> serve both God >> >>>>>
    and money. In Matthew 21, he becomes so >>>>>>> enraged by >>>>>>>>>>>>> people using a >> > temple for economic exchange, he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts flipping tables. >> > >>>>>>>>>> In
    Matthew 19, a rich >>>> man approaches him for instruction
    and >>>>>>> Jesus >> > tells >>>> him to give up all his
    possessions and give the >>>>>>> money to >>>> the >> >
    poor.

    �??It is easier for a camel to go through >>>>>>>>> the eye >>>> of a >>>>>>> needle than >> > for someone who
    is rich to enter >>>> the Kingdom of >>>>>>> God,�?� Jesus
    said in >> > Matthew 19:24 >>>> NIV.

    This notion that a rich person would
    have to stop >>>> being >>>>>>> rich in >> > order to
    follow him is explicitly >>>> incompatible with >>>>>>>
    capitalist >> > thinking. Why make >>>> people choose
    between >>>>>>> following him and pursuing >> > >>>> wealth
    unless he dislikes the >>>>>>> effects of wealth and hopes >>>>>>>>>>>>> to >> > counteract them in some way >>>>>>> by
    encouraging an >>>> alternative lifestyle >> > among his
    followers?

    Despite the context and direct nature of >>>>>>>>> his >>>> statement, it >>>>>>> seems >> > to be interpreted
    quite >>>> differently by many wealthy and >>>>>>>
    influential >> > >>>> Christians who have yet to give up
    their >>>>>>> possessions. >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Under
    capitalism, interpretations favored by rich >>>> people are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> given >> > more of a platform. This has >>>>
    created the exact type of >>>>>>> hierarchy >> > among
    Jesus�?? >>>> fans that he devoted so much time to >>>>>>>
    warning against. >> >>>>> His attempts to redistribute
    power are >>>>>>> often >>>> downplayed, and this >> > is
    interpreted instead as a story >>>>>>>>>>> about how nobody
    is perfect. >> > >>>>>>>>>> SIUE is >>>> home to a large
    Christian population, including 20 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>
    Christian organizations, whose members I sincerely hope
    will >>>>>>>>>>> avoid >> > such a convenient dismissal of
    this issue. All >>>> of us at >>>>>>> SIUE, >> > Christian
    or otherwise, should >>>> question the >>>>>>> motivations
    of our >> > sources. Information >>>> is never presented >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> without an agenda, and it >> > is >>>> alarmingly
    common for >>>>>>> information to be presented in >>>>
    deceitful >> > ways.

    An idea as simple as �??love your
    neighbors�?� can >>>> be used >>>>>>> to promote >> > the
    exact opposite message. I >>>> hope that any >>>>>>>
    readers seeking to >> > understand Jesus�?? >>>> words
    will think >>>>>>> critically about their own >> > >>>>
    ideologies as well and whether >>>>>>> they align more
    closely >>>> with the >> > whitewashed commercial >>>>>>>
    version that grants >>>> wishes or the radical >> >
    political figure >>>>>>> portrayed in >>>> the Bible. >> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    nobody reads anything this long



    Exactly. In fact, the motivation is not to even
    start >>>> reading >>>>>>>> it. Very brief posts, otoh,
    almost always get >>>> read.


    Jesus (and God) taught those that were willing
    to learn.

    If you were unwilling to read a few words, let
    alone >>>> books, how do >>>>>>> you hope to learn what was
    being taught?

    Jesus and the New Testament were needed because
    of the >>>> many that >>>>>>> were unwilling to learn and
    follow the simple >>>> rules of the Old >>>>>>> Testament.
    He wants you to understand >>>> and follow him. It is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your choice.



    The main thing I don't like about Jesus is that
    he eats >>>> shit. It's >>>>>> disgusting.



    I remember when you used to post as Scatboi, Ted,
    that was >>>> back >>>>> when I was posting as Carny....man
    what a ride!



    I remember when you used to brag about how much
    shit I can >>>> eat, Chad. >>>> We found it disgusting,
    but you were proud of it.

    >
    tinw, scatboi


    Ted thought he met his soulmate when Chad told him he
    liked >>>> shooting craps.

    Turns out Chad's into projectile diarrhea.


    and this kind of stuff only comes from your sick mind
    ted.

    >

    they don't call him scatboi for nothing, when they're >>>>>>>>>>>>> not calling him alice or fat fuck chadlee


    only you think of this stuff



    Chad is severely demented.

    >

    yes, him and skeeter are both assclowns

    https://postimg.cc/xJDvdhfW



    Obsession and rerun noted. Cowardly switching groups noted.
    You have become like Rudy. Useless.



    He claims he isn't Chad. What should we call him, then?
    "ratboy"? "shitstink"? "pukester"?



    I know you like to be called Alice sometimes, you skirt wearing
    sissy...

    http://al.howardknight.net/?ID=160968069700 ROFL!




    It's ratboy frogging his superior Skeeter.


    That shall be his nickname from now on.



    LOL. Good call. It suits him.

    >
    kiss kiss

    https://tinyurl.com/tardlet LOL!


    More Chad rerun.


    everybody chad, now you chad too, pissbum

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)