If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the sand
and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never happened.
As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation. Maybe "F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]> wrote
in news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the sand
and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never
happened. As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation. Maybe
"F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
He love his arsenal of BUTWHATABOUT, his snipping and spinning words
is weak and so transparent.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]> wrote
in news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post,
the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88
@hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to
defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert from
points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic drift
instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the sand
and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never
happened. As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation. Maybe
"F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
He love his arsenal of BUTWHATABOUT, his snipping and spinning words
is weak and so transparent.
You're right, I sold F'loser The Snipping Ostrich short. The
whataboutism is so lame that I didn't count it because his fleeing
threads was so prevalent it kind of obscured that aspect of his attempts
at topic drift.
Good catch.
Davey Zimmerman #274 <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]>
wrote in news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post, >>>>>>> the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88 >>>>>>>>> @hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking
at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually
decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to >>>>>>> defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert
from points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic
drift instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the
sand and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never
happened. As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation.
Maybe "F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
He love his arsenal of BUTWHATABOUT, his snipping and spinning words
is weak and so transparent.
You're right, I sold F'loser The Snipping Ostrich short. The
whataboutism is so lame that I didn't count it because his fleeing
threads was so prevalent it kind of obscured that aspect of his
attempts at topic drift.
Good catch.
“You lot” (the pathological liars other great love) have scared
him out of yet another thread. Like his idol Chad, Freetard habitually
hides from threads which cite facts or proof of his ineptitude…
]v[etaphoid <[email protected]> wrote in ]news:u4qasi$1d6$[email protected]:
Davey Zimmerman #274 <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]>
wrote in news:[email protected]: >>>>>>>
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses) post, >>>>>>>> the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>, freezer88 >>>>>>>>>> @hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking >>>>>>>>> at the References header in his message). That post, which
started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually >>>>>>>>> decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his go-to >>>>>>>> defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert
from points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic
drift instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the
sand and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never
happened. As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation.
Maybe "F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
He love his arsenal of BUTWHATABOUT, his snipping and spinning words
is weak and so transparent.
You're right, I sold F'loser The Snipping Ostrich short. The
whataboutism is so lame that I didn't count it because his fleeing
threads was so prevalent it kind of obscured that aspect of his
attempts at topic drift.
Good catch.
“You lot” (the pathological liars other great love) have scared
him out of yet another thread. Like his idol Chad, Freetard habitually
hides from threads which cite facts or proof of his ineptitude…
Don't worry, F'loser will be back after he runs out of steam on the
other threads and resharpens his scissors.
Davey Zimmerman #274 <[email protected]> wrote:
]v[etaphoid <[email protected]> wrote in
]news:u4qasi$1d6$[email protected]:
Davey Zimmerman #274 <[email protected]> wrote:
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article <[email protected]>,
Chadweasel274 @zoho.com says...
F'loser The Cowardly Snipper <[email protected]>
wrote in
news:[email protected]:
If I don't reply to this Mark Raslin (w/Ancient Psychoses)
post, the terroists win.
Skeeter <[email protected]> wrote in
news:[email protected]:
In article
<[email protected]>,
freezer88 @hotSPAMTHISmail.com says...
No, he just votes for them.
Where is the rest of the post you coward.
Freezer replied to the post with message-ID
<VjA5M.509215$[email protected]> (easily found by looking >>>>>>>>>> at the References header in his message). That post, which >>>>>>>>>> started the thread, contained the outer-filthing you usually >>>>>>>>>> decry. Did you really want him to quote it?
No he doesn't. Kvetching about "cowardly snipping" is his
go-to defense against having address... Anything, really.
That and gaslighting. Can't forget the gaslighting.
You've been caught dishonestly snipping out context to divert
from points you can't answer or address and trying a lame topic >>>>>>>> drift instead. Sounds like you're the one gaslighting.
That's pretty cowardly too. Hypocrite much, F'loser?
He is like his party. Spin to win.
F'loser's other trick is running away or burying his head in the
sand and pretending whatever triggered the little snowflake never
happened. As you've noticed, he did that in this conversation.
Maybe "F'loser The Snipping Ostrich" is a more fitting name.
Discuss.
He love his arsenal of BUTWHATABOUT, his snipping and spinning
words is weak and so transparent.
You're right, I sold F'loser The Snipping Ostrich short. The
whataboutism is so lame that I didn't count it because his fleeing
threads was so prevalent it kind of obscured that aspect of his
attempts at topic drift.
Good catch.
“You lot” (the pathological liars other great love) have scared
him out of yet another thread. Like his idol Chad, Freetard
habitually hides from threads which cite facts or proof of his
ineptitude…
Don't worry, F'loser will be back after he runs out of steam on the
other threads and resharpens his scissors.
Scissors?
He’s about as cutting as a cumquat…
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 34:05:54 |
| Calls: | 12,109 |
| Files: | 15,006 |
| Messages: | 6,518,336 |