x-no-archive: yes
of Chad's fat?
x-no-archive: yes
of Chad's fat?
Janithor <[email protected]> wrote in news:tjk23d$3lsai$[email protected]:
x-no-archive: yes
It needs to go in the header, my man. If you post that in the body of one more message, we're going to have a serious problem.
x-no-archive: yes
In article <tjk23d$3lsai$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
x-no-archive: yes
of Chad's fat?
cheap beer and doritos
x-no-archive: yes
of Chad's fat?
Skeeter wrote:
In article <tjk23d$3lsai$[email protected]>, [email protected] says...
x-no-archive: yes
of Chad's fat?
cheap beer and doritos
i thought it was rerun fat
Arvid wrote:
Janithor <[email protected]> wrote in news:tjk23d$3lsai$[email protected]:
x-no-archive: yes
It needs to go in the header, my man. If you post that in the body of one more message, we're going to have a serious problem.
why does it matter where it goes it works for what he wants
Janithor <[email protected]> wrote in news:tjk23d$3lsai$[email protected]:
x-no-archive: yes
It needs to go in the header, my man. If you post that in the body of one more message, we're going to have a serious problem.
x-no-archive: yes
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 741 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 55:08:06 |
| Calls: | 12,446 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 15,192 |
| Messages: | 6,537,346 |