https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same as
actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was able to
detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when the hammer was
struck directly," which is normal for this type of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?My guess is no.
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he believed
he was handed a cold gun.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with manslaughter.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same as
actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be made to
fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was able
to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when the hammer
was struck directly," which is normal for this type of revolver,
the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly not
to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a DUTY to
ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not demonstrably do
that, but he was the one that actually pulled the trigger.
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with manslaughter.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same as
actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be made to
fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was able
to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when the hammer
was struck directly," which is normal for this type of revolver,
the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly not
to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not demonstrably do
that, but he was the one that actually pulled the trigger.
1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. Look up
the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie
TomS wrote:
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, soSo a liar always lies?
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie
Interesting way to damn the fat cunt that was your hero p45
You may ALWAYS LIE, you thick cunt, but that is not how it works for
normal, less demented, people, Boo Hoo.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
No... ...we don't know that at all.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same
as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be
made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was
able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when
the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type
of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.
not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with manslaughter.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same as
actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be made to
fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was able
to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when the hammer
was struck directly," which is normal for this type of revolver,
the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, soNo... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly not1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. Look up
to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not demonstrably do
that, but he was the one that actually pulled the trigger.
the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
No... ...we don't know that at all.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same
as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be
made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was
able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when
the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type
of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.
not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about whatQuote the FBI saying that.
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same
as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be
made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was
able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when
the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type
of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.
not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be
made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was
able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when
the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type
of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.
not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.No. You didn't.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did."
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be
made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was
able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when
the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>> trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the >>>>> FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>> trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what >>>>> he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the >>>>> FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withMy guess is no.
manslaughter.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>>>> trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what >>>>>>> he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the >>>>>>> FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with >>>>>>>>>>> manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not >>>>>>>>> demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>>>> trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what >>>>>>> he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the >>>>>>> FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!If it's "posted"...
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:If it's "posted"...
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with >>>>>>>>>>>>> manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not >>>>>>>>>>> demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>>>>>> trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what >>>>>>>>> he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the >>>>>>>>> FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!
On 2022-08-21 15:22, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:If it's "posted"...
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:No. You didn't.
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger. >>>>>>>>>>>>
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with >>>>>>>>>>>>> manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not >>>>>>>>>>> demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!And yet you still can't quote it.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 6:19:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-21 15:22, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you still can't quote it.
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:If it's "posted"...
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:No. You didn't.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor. >>>>>>>>>>>> Look up the word "delegation".the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>> as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly >>>>>>>>>>>>> not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a >>>>>>>>>>>>> DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not >>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the >>>>>>>>>>>>> trigger.
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what >>>>>>>>>>> he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.
On 2022-08-22 11:05, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 6:19:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-21 15:22, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:And yet you still can't quote it.
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:If it's "posted"...
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:No. You didn't.
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI, Baldwin's story was a LIE: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
Quote the FBI saying that.1. He did not have such a duty while he was busy being an actor.the gun would fire without pulling the trigger is not the same
as actually proving that Baldwin pulled the trigger. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI now says that he did." >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
And the article to which that points says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun in question could be >>>>>>>>>>>>>> made to fire without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded chamber, the gun was >>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to detonate a primer "without a pull of the trigger when >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the hammer was struck directly," which is normal for this type
of revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he pulled the trigger, he
believed he was handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that Baldwin is a LIAR, so >>>>>>>>>>>> No... ...we don't know that at all.
whatever he says he "believed" is just another lie and certainly
not to be trusted. As I have said MANY times before Baldwin had a
DUTY to ensure safety on the set, and not only did he not >>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrably do that, but he was the one that actually pulled the
trigger.
Look up the word "delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with this bullshit about what
he "believed." At clearly stated he did not pull the trigger and the
FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite likely both. >>>>>>>>
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.I can't find it because it doesn't exist.
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 12:04:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the
On 2022-08-22 11:05, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 6:19:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-21 15:22, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20
PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally
charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI,
Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withtrigger is not the same as actually
proving that Baldwin pulled the
trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI
now says that he did."
And the article to which that points
says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun
in question could be made to fire
without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded
chamber, the gun was able to detonate a
primer "without a pull of the trigger
when the hammer was struck directly,"
which is normal for this type of
revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
I can't find it because it doesn't exist.And yet you still can't quote it.If it's "posted"...So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No. You didn't.Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he
pulled the trigger, he believed he was
handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that
Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just1. He did not have such a duty while he was
another lie and certainly not to be
trusted. As I have said MANY times before
Baldwin had a DUTY to ensure safety on
the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one
that actually pulled the trigger.
busy being an actor. Look up the word
"delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled
at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with
this bullshit about what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not pull the trigger
and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. They
said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired
WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
On 2022-08-24 19:01, TomS wrote:
On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 12:04:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but a forensic report stating that they couldn't find a reason >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the gun would fire without pulling the
On 2022-08-22 11:05, TomS wrote:
On Sunday, August 21, 2022 at 6:19:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-21 15:22, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 8:41:15 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-20 20:20, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 7:50:53 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-20 19:34, TomS wrote:
On Saturday, August 20, 2022 at 5:15:55 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-20 17:10, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 19, 2022 at 5:26:44 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-19 17:25, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 8:37:26 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 20:21, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, August 16, 2022 at 4:00:48 PM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-16 15:27, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 12, 2022 at 6:22:20
PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-12 17:55, TomS wrote:
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/alec-baldwin-shooting-rust-fbi-forensic-report-santa-fe-new-mexico/
https://www.npr.org/2022/08/11/1117010916/rust-movie-shooting-investigation-baldwin-records
Indeed, Sunshine.
And is he going to be criminally
charged?
Yes or no.
More damning info from the FBI,
Baldwin's story was a LIE:
https://nypost.com/2022/08/15/walls-close-in-on-alec-baldwin-as-his-gun-lie-falls-apart/
My guess at this point is YES, he will be charged withtrigger is not the same as actually
proving that Baldwin pulled the
trigger.
Your source lies. It's says "The FBI
now says that he did."
And the article to which that points
says nothing of the kind.
When you get to the end of it, the gun
in question could be made to fire
without pulling the trigger:
'With the hammer de-cocked on a loaded
chamber, the gun was able to detonate a
primer "without a pull of the trigger
when the hammer was struck directly,"
which is normal for this type of
revolver, the report stated.'
<https://abcnews.go.com/US/gun-rust-shooting-fired-pulling-trigger-fbi-report/story?id=88311336>
I can't find it because it doesn't exist.And yet you still can't quote it.If it's "posted"...So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No. You didn't.Quote the FBI saying that.No... ...we don't know that at all.manslaughter.My guess is no.
Now, what is YOUR guess?
Because regardless of whether or not he
pulled the trigger, he believed he was
handed a cold gun.
The only thing we know for sure is that
Baldwin is a LIAR, so
whatever he says he "believed" is just1. He did not have such a duty while he was
another lie and certainly not to be
trusted. As I have said MANY times before
Baldwin had a DUTY to ensure safety on
the set, and not only did he not
demonstrably do that, but he was the one
that actually pulled the trigger.
busy being an actor. Look up the word
"delegation".
2. We don't know if the trigger was pulled
at all.
Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with
this bullshit about what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not pull the trigger
and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
No, you are - end of story.
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
...and YOU will have no problem finding it!
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. TheySo are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBI
said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine?
Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBIOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. TheyI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop withQuote the FBI saying that.
this bullshit about what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not pull the trigger
and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired
WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine?
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" whenHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBIOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. TheyI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop withQuote the FBI saying that.
this bullshit about what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not pull the trigger
and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired
WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine?
I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" whenHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBIOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. TheyI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop withQuote the FBI saying that.
this bullshit about what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not pull the trigger
and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired
WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine?
I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide the
quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS:
1. The gun was in Baldwin's hands when it discharged.
2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction:
3. Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" when >>>> I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide theSo are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBI >>>>>> said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. They >>>>>>> said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired >>>>>>> WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THEI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this bullshit about what he "believed." At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly stated he did not pull the trigger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine? >>>>> Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.
quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS:
1. The gun was in Baldwin's hands when it discharged.
2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. >>> Deduction:
3. Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" when >> I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide theSo are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBI >>>> said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. They >>>>> said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired >>>>> WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THEI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this bullshit about what he "believed." At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly stated he did not pull the trigger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite
likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine? >>> Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.
quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS:
1. The gun was in Baldwin's hands when it discharged.
2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled.
Deduction:
3. Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" whenHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBI >>>>>> said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. They >>>>>>> said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired >>>>>>> WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE >>>>>>> TRIGGER, FOOL?????I can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this bullshit about what he "believed." At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly stated he did not pull the trigger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger. >>>>>>>>
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine?
I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide the >>>> quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS:
1. The gun was in Baldwin's hands when it discharged.
2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled.
Deduction:
3. Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.Here's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a pull of
the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't possible
at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired without pulling
the trigger.
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable deduction" when >>>> I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] already did [provide theSo are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed that "he FBI >>>>>> said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the trigger," Fool. They >>>>>>> said that the gun, which was in BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired >>>>>>> WITHOUT THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THEI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ IT!So provide the quote—the exact quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh, Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! Stop with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this bullshit about what he "believed." At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly stated he did not pull the trigger >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the FBI said he did. END OF STORY.Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... ...or quite >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> likely both.
:-)
...here:
==============================================
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't exist.
...then you will have no trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, right, Sunshine? >>>>> Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.
quote]". That is an explicit claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS:
1. The gun was in Baldwin's hands when it discharged.
2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. >>> Deduction:
3. Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine.
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,Quote the FBI saying that.
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee!
Stop with this bullshit about
what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not
pull the trigger and the FBI
said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying...
...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonableHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimedOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READBecause it doesn't
exist.
IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting
it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled
the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in
BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
that "he FBI said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that,
right, Sunshine?
deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I]
already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim
that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's
hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't
discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a
pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired
without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several
people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,Quote the FBI saying that.
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee!
Stop with this bullshit about
what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not
pull the trigger and the FBI
said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying...
...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond aHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonableHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimedOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READexist.
IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting
it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled
the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in
BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
that "he FBI said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that,
right, Sunshine?
deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I]
already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim
that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's
hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't
discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a
pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired
without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several
people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the
medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger
being pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be
possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to
the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating? https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,Quote the FBI saying that.
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee!
Stop with this bullshit about
what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not
pull the trigger and the FBI
said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying...
...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Here's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonableHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimedOf course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READexist.
IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting
it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled
the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in
BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
that "he FBI said he did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that,
right, Sunshine?
deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I]
already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim
that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's
hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't
discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a
pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired
without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted forSorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several
people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger
being pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to
the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,Quote the FBI saying that.
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee!
Stop with this bullshit about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not
pull the trigger and the FBI
said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying...
...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond aHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonableHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed >>>>>>>>>> that "he FBI said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READexist.
IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting
it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled
the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in
BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that,
right, Sunshine?
deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] >>>>>>>> already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim >>>>>>>> that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's
hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't
discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a
pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired
without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several
people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the
medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger
being pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be
possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to >> the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating? https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid against Baldwin...
..because I can't see a single word about it that is actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained and published
by Deadline, the district attorney's office stated, "One of the possible defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case "could require up to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,Quote the FBI saying that.
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop with this bullshit about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not
pull the trigger and the FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said he did. END OF STORY.
You're either ignorant or lying... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond aHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonableHardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>> that "he FBI said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote it....and YOU will have no problem finding it!If it's "posted"...Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READexist.
IT!
...then you will have no trouble quoting
it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled
the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in >>>>>>>>>>>>> BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE
TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that,
right, Sunshine?
deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] >>>>>>>>>> already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim >>>>>>>>>> that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's
hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't >>>>>>>>> discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a
pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired
without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several
people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the
medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger
being pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be
possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to >>>> the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
against Baldwin...
..because I can't see a single word about it that is actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained and published
by Deadline, the district attorney's office stated, "One of the possible
defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case
"could require up to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat now.
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid >> against Baldwin...
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop with this bullshit about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull the trigger and the FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said he did. END OF STORY. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond aHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable >>>>>>>>>> deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] >>>>>>>>>> already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim >>>>>>>>>> that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>> that "he FBI said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN....and YOU will have no problem finding it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet you still can't quote it.Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT!If it's "posted"...
...then you will have no trouble quoting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled >>>>>>>>>>>>>> the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in >>>>>>>>>>>>> BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE >>>>>>>>>>>>> TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, >>>>>>>>>>>> right, Sunshine?
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's >>>>>>>>> hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't >>>>>>>>> discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a >>>>>> pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't
possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired >>>>>> without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several >>>>> people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the
medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger >>>> being pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be >>>> possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to >>>> the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
..because I can't see a single word about it that is actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained and published >> by Deadline, the district attorney's office stated, "One of the possible >> defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case >> "could require up to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat now.Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 9:56:25 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid >>>> against Baldwin...
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exactNo, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Already did, Fool.Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop with this bullshit about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he "believed." At
clearly stated he did not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull the trigger and the FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said he did. END OF STORY. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote the FBI saying that.
You're either ignorant or lying... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or quite likely both.
:-)
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond a >>>>>> reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the >>>>>> medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger >>>>>> being pulled.Here's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable >>>>>>>>>>>> deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] >>>>>>>>>>>> already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim >>>>>>>>>>>> that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that "he FBI said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled theI can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN....and YOU will have no problem finding it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet you still can't quote it.Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT!If it's "posted"...
...then you will have no trouble quoting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE
TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TRIGGER, FOOL?????
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right, Sunshine?
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's >>>>>>>>>>> hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't >>>>>>>>>>> discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3.
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the
circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a >>>>>>>> pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't >>>>>>>> possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired >>>>>>>> without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several >>>>>>> people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be >>>>>> possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to >>>>>> the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
..because I can't see a single word about it that is actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained and published >>>> by Deadline, the district attorney's office stated, "One of the possible >>>> defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case >>>> "could require up to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat now.
Can't admit when you're wrong, can you Fool?
On 2022-09-27 22:08, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 9:56:25 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid >>>> against Baldwin...
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Because it doesn't >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exist.
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
So provide the quote—the exact >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> quote—right...No, you are - end of story.No. You didn't.Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stop with this bullshit about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what he "believed." At >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clearly stated he did not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pull the trigger and the FBI >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> said he did. END OF STORY. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote the FBI saying that. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Already did, Fool.
You're either ignorant or lying... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ...or quite likely both.
:-)
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can't determine beyond a >>>>>> reasonable doubt that at the time of the accident (so ruled by the >>>>>> medical examiner) the gun couldn't possibly fire without the trigger >>>>>> being pulled.Here's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when you claimed:Sorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it was a "reasonable >>>>>>>>>>>> deduction" when I asked for the actual quote. You said "[I] >>>>>>>>>>>> already did [provide the quote]". That is an explicit claim >>>>>>>>>>>> that an actual quote of the FBI saying it exists.Hardly, it is a reasonable deduction, Fool.So are you admitting you were ignorant when you claimed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> that "he FBI said he did"...Of course they didn't say "Baldwin pulled the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> trigger," Fool. They said that the gun, which was in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BALDWINS HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT THE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE FUCK PULLED THE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TRIGGER, FOOL?????I can't find it because it doesn't exist.No, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN....and YOU will have no problem finding it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And yet you still can't quote it.Go suck shit, Fool - it is posted, READ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IT!If it's "posted"...
...then you will have no trouble quoting >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it...
...but we both know you won't.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
The FBI never said that that Alec Baldwin pulled >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim otherwise.
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote that said that, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> right, Sunshine?
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was in Baldwin's >>>>>>>>>>> hands when it discharged. 2. The FBI stated the gun couldn't >>>>>>>>>>> discharge UNLESS the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3. >>>>>>>>>>> Baldwin pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of the >>>>>>>> circumstances which led to the discharge of a firearm without a >>>>>>>> pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying that it wasn't >>>>>>>> possible at the time of the accident that the gun could be fired >>>>>>>> without pulling the trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be indicted for
manslaughter because he negligently fired a live round at several >>>>>>> people w/o ANY regard for their safety.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed, it may not be >>>>>> possible to recreate or duplicate all of the circumstances which led to
the discharge of a firearm without a pull of the trigger."
That's reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
..because I can't see a single word about it that is actually true. >>>>
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained and published >>>> by Deadline, the district attorney's office stated, "One of the possible
defendants is well-known movie actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case
"could require up to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat now.
Can't admit when you're wrong, can you Fool?As of right now, I'm not wrong.
Alec Baldwin hasn't been charged, and you can't even show that the DA's office has mentioned the possibility of charging him.
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:11:18 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Stop with this bullshit about
On 2022-09-27 22:08, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 9:56:25 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote:
Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BecauseSo provide theNo, you are - end ofNo. You didn't.Already did,what heQuote the FBI
"believed."
At clearly
stated he did
not pull the
trigger and
the FBI said
he did. END
OF STORY.
saying that.
Fool.
You're either
ignorant or
lying... ...or
quite likely both.
:-)
story.
quote—the exact
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
exist.it
doesn't
Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laidSorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can'tHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when youSorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it wasHardly, it is a reasonable deduction,So are you admitting you were ignorantOf course they didn't say "BaldwinI can't find it because it doesn'tNo, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote...and YOU will have noGo suck shit, Fool - itIf it's "posted"...
is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no
trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you
won't.
problem finding it!
it.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
exist.
The FBI never said that that Alec
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim
otherwise.
pulled the trigger," Fool. They said
that the gun, which was in BALDWINS
HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT
THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE
FUCK PULLED THE TRIGGER, FOOL?????
when you claimed that "he FBI said he
did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote
that said that, right, Sunshine?
Fool.
a "reasonable deduction" when I asked for
the actual quote. You said "[I] already did
[provide the quote]". That is an explicit
claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was
in Baldwin's hands when it discharged. 2. The
FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS
the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3. Baldwin
pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
claimed:
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate
all of the circumstances which led to the discharge
of a firearm without a pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying
that it wasn't possible at the time of the accident
that the gun could be fired without pulling the
trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be
indicted for manslaughter because he negligently
fired a live round at several people w/o ANY regard
for their safety.
determine beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of
the accident (so ruled by the medical examiner) the gun
couldn't possibly fire without the trigger being
pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed,
it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of
the circumstances which led to the discharge of a
firearm without a pull of the trigger." That's
reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed
bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.against Baldwin...
..because I can't see a single word about it that is
actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained
and published by Deadline, the district attorney's office
stated, "One of the possible defendants is well-known movie
actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case "could require up
to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
As of right now, I'm not wrong.Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat
now.
Can't admit when you're wrong, can you Fool?
Alec Baldwin hasn't been charged, and you can't even show that the
DA's office has mentioned the possibility of charging him.
As said by the man who just fell off a cliff.
They are going to charge between one and four persons with homicide;
WHO do you think the ONE person certain to be charged is?
On 2022-09-28 11:56, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:11:18 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Stop with this bullshit about
On 2022-09-27 22:08, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 9:56:25 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BecauseSo provide theNo, you are - end ofNo. You didn't.Already did,what heQuote the FBI
"believed."
At clearly
stated he did
not pull the
trigger and
the FBI said
he did. END
OF STORY.
saying that.
Fool.
You're either
ignorant or
lying... ...or
quite likely both.
:-)
story.
quote—the exact
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
exist.it
doesn't
Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid >>>>>> against Baldwin...Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can'tHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when youSorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it wasHardly, it is a reasonable deduction,So are you admitting you were ignorantOf course they didn't say "BaldwinI can't find it because it doesn'tNo, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote...and YOU will have noGo suck shit, Fool - itIf it's "posted"...
is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no
trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you
won't.
problem finding it!
it.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
exist.
The FBI never said that that Alec
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim
otherwise.
pulled the trigger," Fool. They said
that the gun, which was in BALDWINS
HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT
THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE
FUCK PULLED THE TRIGGER, FOOL?????
when you claimed that "he FBI said he
did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote
that said that, right, Sunshine?
Fool.
a "reasonable deduction" when I asked for
the actual quote. You said "[I] already did
[provide the quote]". That is an explicit
claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was
in Baldwin's hands when it discharged. 2. The
FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS
the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3. Baldwin
pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
claimed:
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate
all of the circumstances which led to the discharge
of a firearm without a pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying
that it wasn't possible at the time of the accident
that the gun could be fired without pulling the
trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be
indicted for manslaughter because he negligently
fired a live round at several people w/o ANY regard
for their safety.
determine beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of
the accident (so ruled by the medical examiner) the gun
couldn't possibly fire without the trigger being
pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed,
it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of
the circumstances which led to the discharge of a
firearm without a pull of the trigger." That's
reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed
bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
..because I can't see a single word about it that is
actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained
and published by Deadline, the district attorney's office
stated, "One of the possible defendants is well-known movie
actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case "could require up
to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
As of right now, I'm not wrong.Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat
now.
Can't admit when you're wrong, can you Fool?
Alec Baldwin hasn't been charged, and you can't even show that the
DA's office has mentioned the possibility of charging him.
As said by the man who just fell off a cliff.
They are going to charge between one and four persons with homicide;No, that's not what they said. You should learn to read for comprehension:
WHO do you think the ONE person certain to be charged is?
'"it's become apparent that we will be potentially charging between one
and four people with criminal charges, and each of those charges will probably include some variation of our homicide statute."'
"will be potentially charging".
On Wednesday, September 28, 2022 at 12:17:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-28 11:56, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 10:11:18 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Stop with this bullshit about
On 2022-09-27 22:08, TomS wrote:
On Tuesday, September 27, 2022 at 9:56:25 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-09-27 21:49, TomS wrote:
On Monday, September 26, 2022 at 10:45:24 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-09-26 22:33, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:50:08 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 21:37, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 9:32:03 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2022-08-26 20:17, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 7:03:36 PM UTC-7,
Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-26 18:49, TomS wrote:
On Friday, August 26, 2022 at 10:02:23 AM
UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2022-08-25 21:12, TomS wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oh,
Puhhhhleeeeesssssseeeeeeeee! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We both know you won't. Because you can't, Sunshine. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BecauseSo provide theNo, you are - end ofNo. You didn't.Already did,what heQuote the FBI
"believed."
At clearly
stated he did
not pull the
trigger and
the FBI said
he did. END
OF STORY.
saying that.
Fool.
You're either
ignorant or
lying... ...or
quite likely both.
:-)
story.
quote—the exact
quote—right...
...here:
============================================== >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
exist.it
doesn't
Would you care to quote where the DA said that any charges will be laid >>>>>>>> against Baldwin...Sorry, but even the FBI is saying that it can'tHere's an actual quote from the report, Sunshine:So you now admit it was a lie when youSorry, Sunshine, but you didn't say it wasHardly, it is a reasonable deduction,So are you admitting you were ignorantOf course they didn't say "BaldwinI can't find it because it doesn'tNo, YOU can find it on YOUR OWN.And yet you still can't quote...and YOU will have noGo suck shit, Fool - itIf it's "posted"...
is posted, READ IT!
...then you will have no
trouble quoting it...
...but we both know you
won't.
problem finding it!
it.
Got it, Sunshine.
:-)
exist.
The FBI never said that that Alec
Baldwin pulled the trigger.
It is a falsehood to claim
otherwise.
pulled the trigger," Fool. They said
that the gun, which was in BALDWINS
HAND, could not have fired WITHOUT
THE TRIGGER BEING PULLED. So, WHO THE
FUCK PULLED THE TRIGGER, FOOL?????
when you claimed that "he FBI said he
did"...
...or were you lying?
You did say there was a precise quote
that said that, right, Sunshine?
Fool.
a "reasonable deduction" when I asked for
the actual quote. You said "[I] already did
[provide the quote]". That is an explicit
claim that an actual quote of the FBI
saying it exists.
They didn't say it.
Hey Fool, here are the FACTS: 1. The gun was
in Baldwin's hands when it discharged. 2. The
FBI stated the gun couldn't discharge UNLESS
the trigger was pulled. Deduction: 3. Baldwin
pulled the trigger.
Even a 3rd grader could understand that.
claimed:
"the FBI said he did [pull the trigger]"
Got it. You're just a garden variety liar.
Fuck you - I explained the OBVIOUS deduction.
“it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate
all of the circumstances which led to the discharge
of a firearm without a pull of the trigger.”
In plain English, that means they're not saying
that it wasn't possible at the time of the accident
that the gun could be fired without pulling the
trigger.
Read this: that fucking bastard Baldwin WILL be
indicted for manslaughter because he negligently
fired a live round at several people w/o ANY regard
for their safety.
determine beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of
the accident (so ruled by the medical examiner) the gun
couldn't possibly fire without the trigger being
pulled.
A fuller quote from the report:
"When an accidental discharge examination is performed,
it may not be possible to recreate or duplicate all of
the circumstances which led to the discharge of a
firearm without a pull of the trigger." That's
reasonable doubt right there.
Hey Fool, do you want to reconsider your uninformed
bloviating?
https://people.com/movies/alec-baldwin-lawyer-issues-statement-after-district-attorney-says-he-could-face-charges-rust-shooting/
And that text doesn't appear in it anywhere.
..because I can't see a single word about it that is
actually true.
There is this:
'In a letter to the New Mexico Board of Finance, obtained
and published by Deadline, the district attorney's office
stated, "One of the possible defendants is well-known movie
actor Alec Baldwin," adding that the case "could require up
to 4 separate jury trials."'
But here is that letter:
<https://deadline.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Emergency-Funding-Request-Packet-Rust.pdf>
No, that's not what they said. You should learn to read for comprehension: >>As of right now, I'm not wrong.Sorry, but I'll wait for the denouement.
Sorry, Sunshine: you lose again.
;-)
Hey Fool, the charges are about to come - best admit defeat
now.
Can't admit when you're wrong, can you Fool?
Alec Baldwin hasn't been charged, and you can't even show that the
DA's office has mentioned the possibility of charging him.
As said by the man who just fell off a cliff.
They are going to charge between one and four persons with homicide;
WHO do you think the ONE person certain to be charged is?
'"it's become apparent that we will be potentially charging between one
and four people with criminal charges, and each of those charges will
probably include some variation of our homicide statute."'
"will be potentially charging".
LOL! And WTF do you THINK that means, Fool?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 155:46:07 |
| Calls: | 12,092 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,709 |