1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Dims are for abortions, but this one is RIDICULOUS!

    From TomS@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 8 17:04:37 2022
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher
    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation," but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't aborted...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nevermind@21:1/5 to In reply to "Alan" who on Tue Aug 9 00:59:06 2022
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:

    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/ inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.

    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for women's rights.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Aug 8 17:29:41 2022
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this
    bill wasn't aborted...


    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Aug 8 17:41:56 2022
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this
    bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Aug 8 17:33:58 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this
    bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Nevermind on Mon Aug 8 18:54:04 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/ inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation," but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on
    it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Mon Aug 8 18:59:17 2022
    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/
    inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation," >>>>>> but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this >>>>>> bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on >>>> it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!

    Cite, please!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nevermind@21:1/5 to In reply to "Alan" who on Tue Aug 9 02:56:32 2022
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:

    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/ inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this
    bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on
    it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!

    Cite, please!

    He won't have a cite. He's just 100% fatuous hate-filled BS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Nevermind on Tue Aug 9 00:37:56 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 10:56:34 PM UTC-4, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:

    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several
    other names were even worse): https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/ inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation,"
    but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this
    bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on
    it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for
    women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!

    Cite, please!

    He won't have a cite. He's just 100% fatuous hate-filled BS.

    Kids, Tommy's comments are an illustration of the 1% per year decline in cognition after age 60.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Aug 9 12:06:46 2022
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:59:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen after several >>>>>> other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/
    inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher >>>>>>

    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce inflation," >>>>>> but it will increase deficits and unemployment. Unfortunately, this >>>>>> bill wasn't aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and, THEN, commenting on
    it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!
    Cite, please!

    Do your OWN research, Fool. You apparently don't know that Planned Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, objective was to reduce the propagation of U.S. blacks (eugenics):
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/05/13/planned-parenthood-eugenics-abortion-pressure-column/5022187001/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Aug 9 12:14:29 2022
    On 2022-08-09 12:06, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:59:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen
    after several other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce
    inflation," but it will increase deficits and
    unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't
    aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's
    unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and,
    THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the
    country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund
    organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!
    Cite, please!

    Do your OWN research, Fool.

    It's not my job to support your claims, Sunshine.

    From the fact that you haven't, we all understand that you can't.


    You apparently don't know that Planned
    Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, objective was to reduce the propagation of U.S. blacks (eugenics): https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/05/13/planned-parenthood-eugenics-abortion-pressure-column/5022187001/
    Which is no support at all for your claim.

    Produce your support for your claim that: "They even fund organizations
    that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!".

    Hell, produce support for just the claim that there are any such
    organizations at all.

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Tue Aug 9 16:03:31 2022
    On 2022-08-09 16:02, TomS wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 12:14:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-09 12:06, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:59:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen
    after several other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce
    inflation," but it will increase deficits and
    unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't
    aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's
    unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and,
    THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the
    country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund
    organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!
    Cite, please!

    Do your OWN research, Fool.
    It's not my job to support your claims, Sunshine.

    From the fact that you haven't, we all understand that you can't.
    You apparently don't know that Planned
    Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, objective was to reduce the
    propagation of U.S. blacks (eugenics):
    https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/05/13/planned-parenthood-eugenics-abortion-pressure-column/5022187001/
    Which is no support at all for your claim.

    Produce your support for your claim that: "They even fund organizations
    that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!".

    Hell, produce support for just the claim that there are any such
    organizations at all.

    :-)

    Hell, I did, Fool, but you are too ignorant or biased to see it.

    Nope. You most certainly did not.


    In any case, this thread is about the abortion named the Inflation Reduction Act, so STICK TO THE SUBJECT!

    You're the one who put abortions at issue.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Tue Aug 9 16:02:23 2022
    On Tuesday, August 9, 2022 at 12:14:32 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-09 12:06, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 6:59:20 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 18:54, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:59:08 PM UTC-7, Nevermind wrote:
    In reply to "Alan" who wrote the following:
    On 2022-08-08 17:33, TomS wrote:
    On Monday, August 8, 2022 at 5:29:43 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-08-08 17:04, TomS wrote:
    Namely the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act (chosen
    after several other names were even worse):
    https://www.heritage.org/budget-and-spending/commentary/inflation-reduction-act-euphemism-big-government-socialism-higher


    The ONLY thing we can be sure of is it WILL NOT "reduce
    inflation," but it will increase deficits and
    unemployment. Unfortunately, this bill wasn't
    aborted...

    You're citing heritage.org and pretending that's
    unbiased?

    LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

    And YOU pretended to READ IT! LOL! Try reading it and,
    THEN, commenting on it, Fool.

    Nope. I didn't pretend anything of the sort.

    Try quoting the salient portions and I'll comment on them.
    No one is for abortions. But a significant majority of the
    country is for women's rights.

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund
    organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!
    Cite, please!

    Do your OWN research, Fool.
    It's not my job to support your claims, Sunshine.

    From the fact that you haven't, we all understand that you can't.
    You apparently don't know that Planned
    Parenthood's founder, Margaret Sanger, objective was to reduce the propagation of U.S. blacks (eugenics): https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/voices/2021/05/13/planned-parenthood-eugenics-abortion-pressure-column/5022187001/
    Which is no support at all for your claim.

    Produce your support for your claim that: "They even fund organizations
    that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!".

    Hell, produce support for just the claim that there are any such organizations at all.

    :-)

    Hell, I did, Fool, but you are too ignorant or biased to see it.

    In any case, this thread is about the abortion named the Inflation Reduction Act, so STICK TO THE SUBJECT!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Wed Aug 10 11:22:34 2022
    TomS wrote:

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund
    organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!

    And how you mother regretted saying no.

    She'd have voted to abort you for the last seventy years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irving S@21:1/5 to Bigbird on Wed Aug 10 13:55:49 2022
    On Wednesday, August 10, 2022 at 7:22:36 AM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:
    TomS wrote:

    WRONG! The Dims are FULL BORE for abortions. They even fund
    organizations that push abortions on unsuspecting women!!
    And how you mother regretted saying no.

    She'd have voted to abort you for the last seventy years.

    Tough words from an unemployed dog walker.

    At least Tom knows who his mother is.

    So glad you are here. Just know asshole, you do an incredible job of entertaining. You are surely the laughing stock of your family, how could it be otherwise!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)