Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison. That anyone could just roll up their sleeves based on what they are "told". well you are not worthy of my time. The only science is that which fits the agenda. To say that science means anything any
more is a joke. Science that is contrary to the agenda means you are cancelled, or ostracized, or lose your ability to work. Science as we have known it is dead. If you took the jab because of the "science" you are an imbecile.

You imbeciles will believe everything you read that supports the poison,, but will deny everything to the contrary. How anyone could be so fucking stupid is beyond me. Get ready for another round of jabs, they are coming. Fucking sheep.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So
predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So

predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it
out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So predictable your response,
right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

Not only is Alan correct on his point of burden of proof, I've also sought out specifically the type of information that Irving is claiming and not only no credible evidence to support Irving's claim (and yes, I have college degrees), but indications that the ground truth is the opposite of Irving's claims.

BTW, heard this week that the Insurance industry is still a mess in trying
to figure out the new mortality tables as impacted by CoVid mortality;
one of their big questions is if it merits a +20% rate hike for just a year
or two, or if it is going to be a permanent +10% rate hike....etc.

The short answer is that they know mortality claims have spiked like crazy, indicating a major shift in Actuarial total lifespans being shortened, but
they don't know enough yet to know how much, except that it includes far younger age group sets (eg, <40) than historical mortality-age profile curves.

-hh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research.

Independent research suggests that people who can never support their
claim are probably liars.

--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 8:47:23 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it
out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

Not only is Alan correct on his point of burden of proof, I've also sought out
specifically the type of information that Irving is claiming and not only no credible evidence to support Irving's claim (and yes, I have college degrees),
but indications that the ground truth is the opposite of Irving's claims.

BTW, heard this week that the Insurance industry is still a mess in trying to figure out the new mortality tables as impacted by CoVid mortality;
one of their big questions is if it merits a +20% rate hike for just a year or two, or if it is going to be a permanent +10% rate hike....etc.

The short answer is that they know mortality claims have spiked like crazy, indicating a major shift in Actuarial total lifespans being shortened, but they don't know enough yet to know how much, except that it includes far younger age group sets (eg, <40) than historical mortality-age profile curves.

-hh

No doubt that unlike the Spinster to the north, you have a college degree. You use a lot of technical terms that one would get from college, sad that the application phase often lacks. I do applaud you for often responding without googling, the
Spinster googles and makes himself sound intelligent, where you do seem to possess a degree of intelligence.

The reason for the mortality claims spiking is because of the poison jab. What is so hard to understand? Of do you live in perpetual denial?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 1:55:10 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:

Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research.

Independent research suggests that people who can never support their
claim are probably liars.

--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!

It does not take independent research to acknowledge that anyone who is an unemployed dog walker is nothing short of the ULTIMATE loser. What a joke you are. Thanks loser, for taking the time to respond. Like a trained poodle, you perform on demand,
You do know about poodles right? Sometime in your illustrious career walking canines, you surely walked a poodle?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 1:55:10 PM UTC-4, Bigbird wrote:

Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research.

Independent research suggests that people who can never support their
claim are probably liars.

--
Bozo bin
Felicity
George R
Irving S
Texasgate
Enjoy!

I don't have to support anything to a dog walking twit. The data is out there. With all the time you have, just take a moment twit. You might just learn something.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 2:35:44 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 8:47:23 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no
worries about long term side effects. So predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

Not only is Alan correct on his point of burden of proof, I've also sought out
specifically the type of information that Irving is claiming and not only no
credible evidence to support Irving's claim (and yes, I have college degrees),
but indications that the ground truth is the opposite of Irving's claims.

BTW, heard this week that the Insurance industry is still a mess in trying to figure out the new mortality tables as impacted by CoVid mortality;
one of their big questions is if it merits a +20% rate hike for just a year or two, or if it is going to be a permanent +10% rate hike....etc.

The short answer is that they know mortality claims have spiked like crazy, indicating a major shift in Actuarial total lifespans being shortened, but they don't know enough yet to know how much, except that it includes far younger age group sets (eg, <40) than historical mortality-age profile curves.

No doubt that unlike the Spinster to the north, you have a college degree. You use a lot of technical terms that one would get from college, sad that the application phase often lacks. I do applaud you for often responding without googling, the Spinster googles and makes himself sound intelligent, where you do seem to possess a degree of intelligence.

You both worship as well as disregard formal education; contradict much?

The reason for the mortality claims spiking is because of the poison jab. What is so hard to understand?

What's hard to understand is why you persist in trying to insist on that causality, when the data does not support that conclusion: the only
reasonable conclusion to draw is that you yourself are not rational.

Of do you live in perpetual denial?

Denial that you've repeatedly made irrational claims? No, not at all;
I'm quite comfortable with the level of data out there which confirms
your claim as false, even if you can't cope with that yourself.

-hh

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So

predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

No point - you DON'T READ THEM!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 1:44:28 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 2:35:44 PM UTC-4, Irving S wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 8:47:23 AM UTC-4, -hh wrote:

On Tuesday, March 15, 2022 at 12:40:52 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no
worries about long term side effects. So predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

Not only is Alan correct on his point of burden of proof, I've also sought out
specifically the type of information that Irving is claiming and not only no
credible evidence to support Irving's claim (and yes, I have college degrees),
but indications that the ground truth is the opposite of Irving's claims.

BTW, heard this week that the Insurance industry is still a mess in trying
to figure out the new mortality tables as impacted by CoVid mortality; one of their big questions is if it merits a +20% rate hike for just a year
or two, or if it is going to be a permanent +10% rate hike....etc.

The short answer is that they know mortality claims have spiked like crazy,
indicating a major shift in Actuarial total lifespans being shortened, but
they don't know enough yet to know how much, except that it includes far younger age group sets (eg, <40) than historical mortality-age profile curves.

No doubt that unlike the Spinster to the north, you have a college degree. You use a lot of technical terms that one would get from college, sad that the application phase often lacks. I do applaud you for often responding without googling, the Spinster googles and makes himself sound intelligent, where you do seem to possess a degree of intelligence.

You both worship as well as disregard formal education; contradict much?

The reason for the mortality claims spiking is because of the poison jab. What is so hard to understand?

What's hard to understand is why you persist in trying to insist on that causality, when the data does not support that conclusion: the only reasonable conclusion to draw is that you yourself are not rational.

Of do you live in perpetual denial?

Denial that you've repeatedly made irrational claims? No, not at all;
I'm quite comfortable with the level of data out there which confirms
your claim as false, even if you can't cope with that yourself.

-hh

That's rich - the Lyin' Asshole talking about DENIAL!!!!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 2022-03-15 4:53 p.m., TomS wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 9:40:52 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 7:33 p.m., Irving S wrote:

On Monday, March 14, 2022 at 5:20:23 PM UTC-4, Alan wrote:

On 2022-03-14 1:58 p.m., Irving S wrote:

Please do not respond to my posts any further.

Every day, more data comes out about this poison.

"Data" which you don't present...

You never finished college old man, one thing they taught you was independent research. The information is out there, you can seek it out, or just ignore it. See if I care, I am not the one vaxed, I have no worries about long term side effects. So

predictable your response, right on the button, As reliable as Old Faithful. Good job old troll, good job!

Sorry...

...but when you make claims...

...YOU get to support them.

No point - you DON'T READ THEM!!!

You don't ever provide them, so how can I?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)