1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.SPORT.GOLF

  • Re: More proof the jabs are garbage!

    From TomS@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri Apr 1 23:41:51 2022
    On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:28:37 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-02-24 1:26 p.m., Irving S wrote:
    ttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362

    Of course, everyone of you jabbed twits will dispute the evidence.
    They live in a dream world. where anything positive about the poison
    is true, anything contrary is always wrong, conspiracy nonsense.
    Live in your dreamworld assholes, a 4th jab coming this fall!


    More useless than your usual garbage...

    ...as that article has nothing to do with vaccination...

    ...but it DOES state clearly:

    'Meaning The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for
    patients with COVID-19.'

    LOL! You fell my trick: you CAN search the Internet, you Fool!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Apr 2 01:19:15 2022
    On 2022-04-01 11:41 p.m., TomS wrote:
    On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:28:37 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-02-24 1:26 p.m., Irving S wrote:
    ttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2789362 >>>
    Of course, everyone of you jabbed twits will dispute the evidence.
    They live in a dream world. where anything positive about the poison
    is true, anything contrary is always wrong, conspiracy nonsense.
    Live in your dreamworld assholes, a 4th jab coming this fall!


    More useless than your usual garbage...

    ...as that article has nothing to do with vaccination...

    ...but it DOES state clearly:

    'Meaning The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for
    patients with COVID-19.'

    LOL! You fell my trick: you CAN search the Internet, you Fool!

    YOUR trick, Sunshine?

    You're admitting that you are the one posting as Irving/Felicity?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bigbird@21:1/5 to TomS on Sat Apr 2 21:56:06 2022
    TomS wrote:

    On Friday, February 25, 2022 at 10:28:37 AM UTC-8, Alan wrote:
    On 2022-02-24 1:26 p.m., Irving S wrote:
    ttps://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullarticle/2
    789362

    Of course, everyone of you jabbed twits will dispute the
    evidence. They live in a dream world. where anything positive
    about the poison is true, anything contrary is always wrong,
    conspiracy nonsense. Live in your dreamworld assholes, a 4th jab
    coming this fall!


    More useless than your usual garbage...

    ...as that article has nothing to do with vaccination...

    ...but it DOES state clearly:

    'Meaning The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin
    for patients with COVID-19.'

    LOL! You fell my trick: you CAN search the Internet, you Fool!

    Oh dear Betty, it looks like you fell... hard.

    So you have been spending most of your time on this group talking to
    yourself.

    That dementia has you owned.

    --
    Bozo bin
    Felicity
    George R
    Irving S
    Texasgate
    Enjoy!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)