https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?That would be nice...
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That would be nice...
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That would be nice...
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!Nope.
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't involve Joe Biden.
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Nope.
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:That would be nice...
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Just lacking any evidence...
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't involve Joe
Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows. And it ONLY has to involve a RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool. The pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
And it ONLY has to involve a
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
The
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.That is PRECISELY what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
...that's not a crime.
:-)
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.That is PRECISELY what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan
wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his
deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
On 2023-08-25 19:09, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received >> a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton. >>
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his
deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.I don't need to.
My inability to provide an answer is not proof that anything illegal happened.
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.That is PRECISELY what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
-hh
On Sunday, August 27, 2023 at 12:11:27 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-25 19:09, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:I don't need to.
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received >>>> a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton. >>>>
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his >>>>> deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
My inability to provide an answer is not proof that anything illegal
happened.
Your "inability" to answer a simple question speaks VOLUMES on the illegal nature of BooBoo's activities.
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every
right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.That is PRECISELY what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.That is PRECISELY what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his
deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.Really?
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually
makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:07:09 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Really?
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >>>>>>>> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't
involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they >>>>>> were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received >>>>>> a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like
having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his >>>>>>> deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what >>>>> BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually
makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, WHO is under indictment, BooBoo, Ivanka or Jerrod?
On 2023-08-30 23:01, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:07:09 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Really?
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >>>>>>>> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't >>>>>>>> involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they >>>>>> were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like >>>>>>> having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his >>>>>>> deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what >>>>> BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually
makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, WHO is under indictment, BooBoo, Ivanka or Jerrod?
Hunter Biden isn't under indictment, Sunshine.
Not for simply getting paid.
On 2023-08-30 23:01, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:07:09 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Really?
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >>>>>>>> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't >>>>>>>> involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they >>>>>> were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aWould you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool.
TheYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like >>>>>>> having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his >>>>>>> deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what >>>>> BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually
makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, WHO is under indictment, BooBoo, Ivanka or Jerrod?Hunter Biden isn't under indictment, Sunshine.
Not for simply getting paid.
On Thursday, August 31, 2023 at 2:10:37 AM UTC-4, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-30 23:01, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:07:09 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Really?
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>> On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>> On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >>>>>>>> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't >>>>>>>> involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they
were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool. >>>>>> Would you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
The
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like >>>>>>> having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his
deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what
BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal. >>>>
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually >> makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, WHO is under indictment, BooBoo, Ivanka or Jerrod?
Hunter Biden isn't under indictment, Sunshine.And the charges against Ivanka were dropped for not being sufficiently timely:
Not for simply getting paid.
"The allegations against defendant Ivanka Trump do not support any claims that
accrued after February 6, 2016. Thus, all claims against her should have been
dismissed as untimely."
<https://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/fbem/DocumentDisplayServlet?documentId=xPkzTWEa_PLUS_1dK76s34RrffQ==&system=prod>
FYI, that doesn't mean she's totally innocent, but rather that she had officially
divested herself from the family business prior to the fraud charges specific to
the date of 6 Feb 2016.
-hh
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 11:10:37 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-30 23:01, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 11:07:09 PM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Hunter Biden isn't under indictment, Sunshine.
On Wednesday, August 30, 2023 at 12:08:37 AM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 26, 2023 at 4:40:20 AM UTC-7, -hh wrote:Really?
On Friday, August 25, 2023 at 10:09:58 PM UTC-4, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 9:29:05 AM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-08-21 18:41, Tommy wrote:
On Tuesday, August 15, 2023 at 5:32:51 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-15 17:00, Tommy wrote:Just lacking any evidence...
On Monday, August 14, 2023 at 10:28:46 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-14 20:33, Tommy wrote:
On Sunday, August 13, 2023 at 12:11:01 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 2023-08-13 11:38, Tommy wrote:
On Saturday, August 12, 2023 at 10:00:22 PM UTC-7, Alan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
On 2023-08-12 21:32, Tommy wrote:
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/republican-congressman-introduces-impeachment-articles-against-president-joe-biden/ar-AA1fcwJ8
That is PRECISELY what the record shows.Nope.That would be nice...That's not the way it works, Sunshine.
What evidence are they lacking?
You've got to show they have ANY evidence.
You mean like eye witnesses and bank records?
...but none of that...
Literally, NONE of that.
...has been shown to involve Joe Biden.
YES, literally ALL OF THAT!!!!!!!
If it actually had, it would have been parade in front of every >>>>>>>>>> right-wing media outlet.
Money paid to a company associated with Hunter Biden doesn't >>>>>>>>>> involve Joe Biden.
LOL! That's NOT what the record shows.
The Republicans are relying on "millions" paid to business as if they >>>>>>>> were entirely paid to Hunter Biden...
...and they have literally not a shred of proof that Joe Biden received
a dime.
And it ONLY has to involve aYou said pretty much the exact same kind of things about Hillary Clinton.
RELATIVE OR FRIEND of the senile pervert to be bribery, Fool. >>>>>>>> Would you care to cite the law that says that, Sunshine?
The
pervert has gone to great lengths to hide the money trail, like >>>>>>>>> having BooBoo pay his expenses. But the House committee is after his >>>>>>>>> deception like a blood hound.
How'd that work out, Sunshine?
Even if it was only 'had the last name "Biden"'...
Again, WHAT did BooBoo do to earn MILLIONS?????
...that's not a crime.
:-)
You STILL haven't come up with an even laughable explanation for what >>>>>>> BooBoo did to earn MILLIONS from Burisma that is remotely legal.
When did we see a legal explanation for what Kushner did to earn *B*illions from the Saudis?
Oh, and Ivanka for millions from China?
Keep in mind that unlike Bo, both of them were actually official White House advisors.
Hey Fucking Retard, trying lame WHATABOUTISM isn't going to cut it.
I’m merely noting your hypocrisy.
Because anything that you invoke that makes the two different actually >>>> makes Ivanka & Jerrod an objectively worse transgression than Bo.
-hh
Hey Lyin' Asshole, WHO is under indictment, BooBoo, Ivanka or Jerrod?
Not for simply getting paid.
You should edit that to read: "BooBoo isn't under indictment YET"
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 12:53:50 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,518,005 |