• Shrillary AGREES she broke the law

    From Tommy@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 2 11:06:44 2023
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier: https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93
    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sun Apr 2 15:12:59 2023
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier: <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.

    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right
    before the election and then retracting their finding not interference?

    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking
    into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Apr 2 21:39:39 2023
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier: <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right
    before the election and then retracting their finding not interference?

    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking
    into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sun Apr 2 22:18:11 2023
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier: >>> <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right
    before the election and then retracting their finding not interference?

    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking
    into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????

    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun Apr 2 22:27:21 2023
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier:
    <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right
    before the election and then retracting their finding not interference? >>
    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking
    into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Sun Apr 2 22:30:20 2023
    On 2023-04-02 22:27, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier: >>>>> <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right
    before the election and then retracting their finding not interference? >>>>
    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking
    into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???

    So you cannot quote a statute or show how anyone violated it.

    Got it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Apr 3 18:16:29 2023
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:30:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 22:27, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier:
    <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right >>>> before the election and then retracting their finding not interference? >>>>
    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking >>>> into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???
    So you cannot quote a statute or show how anyone violated it.

    Got it.

    What you've got, and always have got, is a BULLSHIT RESPONSE! Go LOOK UP the statute yourself, you LAZY ASSHOLE!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Apr 3 19:16:39 2023
    On 2023-04-03 18:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:30:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 22:27, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier:
    <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right >>>>>> before the election and then retracting their finding not interference? >>>>>>
    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking >>>>>> into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???
    So you cannot quote a statute or show how anyone violated it.

    Got it.

    What you've got, and always have got, is a BULLSHIT RESPONSE! Go LOOK UP the statute yourself, you LAZY ASSHOLE!

    How can I possibly look up the statute the YOU claim someone violated, Sunshine?

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tommy@21:1/5 to Alan on Mon Apr 3 20:05:31 2023
    On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 7:16:42 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-03 18:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:30:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 22:27, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier:
    <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right >>>>>> before the election and then retracting their finding not interference?

    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking >>>>>> into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???
    So you cannot quote a statute or show how anyone violated it.

    Got it.

    What you've got, and always have got, is a BULLSHIT RESPONSE! Go LOOK UP the statute yourself, you LAZY ASSHOLE!
    How can I possibly look up the statute the YOU claim someone violated, Sunshine?

    :-)

    I suggest Google, Fool.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tommy on Mon Apr 3 21:31:11 2023
    On 2023-04-03 20:05, Tommy wrote:
    On Monday, April 3, 2023 at 7:16:42 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-03 18:16, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:30:23 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 22:27, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 10:18:14 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 21:39, Tommy wrote:
    On Sunday, April 2, 2023 at 3:13:13 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
    On 2023-04-02 11:06, Tommy wrote:
    ...when she, through her campaign committee, paid for the Steele dossier:
    <https://apnews.com/article/russia-ukraine-2022-midterm-elections-business-elections-presidential-elections-5468774d18e8c46f81b55e9260b13e93>

    This is PROOF that the 2020 election was tampered with.
    Really? How so?

    How isn't the fact that FBI first announced finding new emails right >>>>>>>> before the election and then retracting their finding not interference?

    You DO know what the senior FBI agent in the New York office looking >>>>>>>> into it turned out to be an agent paid by Russia...

    ...right?

    LOL! You realize, of course, to pay to have FALSE information distributed to manipulate an election is ILLEGAL, don't you? DON'T YOU????
    Really?

    What statute would that be?

    Assuming you can show that actually happened.

    Oh go FUCK YOURSELF. Are you REALLY that STUPID, Fool???
    So you cannot quote a statute or show how anyone violated it.

    Got it.

    What you've got, and always have got, is a BULLSHIT RESPONSE! Go LOOK UP the statute yourself, you LAZY ASSHOLE!
    How can I possibly look up the statute the YOU claim someone violated,
    Sunshine?

    :-)

    I suggest Google, Fool.

    I suggest if you claim she broke the law...

    ...then it's YOUR job to state which law she broke.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)