He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.Really?
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months.Really?
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received new information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin used had been modified before being delivered to the low-budget western in October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had been fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to misfire, as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the gun functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to fire the gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can still be charged with a lesser crime.
On 2023-04-20 16:49, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months.Really?
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received new information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin used had been modified before being delivered to the low-budget western in October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had been fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to misfire, as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the gun functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to fire the gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can still be charged with a lesser crime."The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"
How'd that work out for you, Sunshine?
:-)
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:22:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-20 16:49, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:penalty from 5 years to 18 months. >>>
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.Really?
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received new information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin used had
been modified before being delivered to the low-budget western in
October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had been fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to misfire,
as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the gun"The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"
functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to fire the
gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can still be
charged with a lesser crime.
How'd that work out for you, Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! They said this:
“This decision does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpability
and charges may be refiled. Our follow-up investigation will remain
active and on-going.”
Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:22:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-20 16:49, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months. >>>Really?
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received new information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin used had
been modified before being delivered to the low-budget western in October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had been fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to misfire,
as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the gun functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to fire the"The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"
gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can still be
charged with a lesser crime.
How'd that work out for you, Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! They said this:
“This decision does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpabilityWhat's your aim here Betty? Clearly you have no interest in truth or justice... you just want to see the guy who lampooned your loser of a president get locked up for something, anything?
and charges may be refiled. Our follow-up investigation will remain
active and on-going.”
There is no value in any of your opinions.
The charges have been dropped. You went in hard on the wrong side of
this and keep digging yourself deeper.
You truly are a fucked up, demented old fart, Betty.
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 6:32:51 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:22:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:What's your aim here Betty? Clearly you have no interest in truth or
On 2023-04-20 16:49, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:penalty from 5 years to 18 months. >>>
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max
"The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.Really?
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received new
information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin used had
been modified before being delivered to the low-budget western in
October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had been >>>>> fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to misfire,
as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the gun
functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to fire the
gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can still be
charged with a lesser crime.
How'd that work out for you, Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! They said this:
“This decision does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpability
and charges may be refiled. Our follow-up investigation will remain
active and on-going.”
justice... you just want to see the guy who lampooned your loser of a
president get locked up for something, anything?
There is no value in any of your opinions.
The charges have been dropped. You went in hard on the wrong side of
this and keep digging yourself deeper.
You truly are a fucked up, demented old fart, Betty.
Hey BirdBrain, what part of your TINY brain doesn't understand "does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpability?"
On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 6:32:51 AM UTC-7, Bigbird wrote:
Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 5:22:58 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:
On 2023-04-20 16:49, Tommy wrote:
On Thursday, April 20, 2023 at 3:41:12 PM UTC-7, Alan wrote:max penalty from 5 years to 18 months. >>>
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.Really?
You're sure about that, are you?
'Alec Baldwin: Criminal charges dropped over shooting,'
<https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-65343821>
"The stunning development comes after prosecutors received
new information into the case — that the gun that Baldwin
used had been modified before being delivered to the
low-budget western in October 2021, the sources said.
The replica of the vintage weapon — a Colt 45 revolver — had
been fitted with a new trigger, making it possible for it to
misfire, as Baldwin has said, according to the sources."
This is directly at odds with what the FBI said, which the"The prosecutor feels EXACTLY the way I do and posted here:"
gun functioned normally and a trigger pull was required to
fire the gun. Somebody has something wrong. Also, Baldwin can
still be charged with a lesser crime.
How'd that work out for you, Sunshine?
:-)
LOL! They said this:
“This decision does not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminalWhat's your aim here Betty? Clearly you have no interest in truth
culpability and charges may be refiled. Our follow-up
investigation will remain active and on-going.”
or justice... you just want to see the guy who lampooned your loser
of a president get locked up for something, anything?
There is no value in any of your opinions.
The charges have been dropped. You went in hard on the wrong side
of this and keep digging yourself deeper.
You truly are a fucked up, demented old fart, Betty.
Hey BirdBrain, what part of your TINY brain doesn't understand "does
not absolve Mr. Baldwin of criminal culpability?"
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
On 7/12/24 10:54 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max
penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
...with prejudice.
Suck it.
Golly, how about that.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
and of course, tommy also punked out on risking an IRL wager too:
[quote]
But you're not brave enough to wager on it.Hey Fool, criminal charges are filed by the DA - don'tI do know that.
you KNOW THAT?
So when is that happening?
:-)
You will know once it happens, Fool.
Got it.
What you "got" is that I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS.
PERIOD. You and the Lyin' Asshole qualify for BOTH.
I get that you talk a big game...
...but punk.
Of course, choosing to use "welch proof" wager terms makes it
impossible for cheaters or liars to do just that: cheat / lie.
Ironic that it is Tom who's opposed to using them.
Go back and reread Rule #1:
1. I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS. PERIOD.
Which is because you can't exclude yourself! <g>
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4Ekpa6LaLBo/m/SDx5Oyr6BgAJ>
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max
penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
...with prejudice.
Suck it.
But you're not brave enough to wager on it.Hey Fool, criminal charges are filed by the DA - don'tI do know that.
you KNOW THAT?
So when is that happening?
:-)
You will know once it happens, Fool.
Got it.
What you "got" is that I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS.
PERIOD. You and the Lyin' Asshole qualify for BOTH.
I get that you talk a big game...
...but punk.
Of course, choosing to use "welch proof" wager terms makes it
impossible for cheaters or liars to do just that: cheat / lie.
Ironic that it is Tom who's opposed to using them.
Go back and reread Rule #1:
1. I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS. PERIOD.
On 2024-07-13 10:37, -hh wrote:
On 7/12/24 10:54 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2023-02-20 18:07, Tommy wrote:
He will NOT be charged with a gun enhancement, dropping the max
penalty from 5 years to 18 months.
OTOH, it also makes conviction much more likely.
...with prejudice.
Suck it.
Golly, how about that.
“LOL! I note that you didn't comment that the libtard networks have been >> pretty quiet about calling for first degree murder charges on Bawling
Baldwin”
- Tommy, December 2021.
and of course, tommy also punked out on risking an IRL wager too:
[quote]
;;;;But you're not brave enough to wager on it.;Hey Fool, criminal charges are filed by the DA - don'tI do know that.
you KNOW THAT?
;
So when is that happening?
:-)
You will know once it happens, Fool.
;
Got it.
What you "got" is that I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS.
PERIOD. You and the Lyin' Asshole qualify for BOTH.
I get that you talk a big game...
;
...but punk.
Of course, choosing to use "welch proof" wager terms makes it
impossible for cheaters or liars to do just that: cheat / lie.
;
Ironic that it is Tom who's opposed to using them.
;
Go back and reread Rule #1:
1. I don't wager with CHEATS and LIARS. PERIOD.
Which is because you can't exclude yourself! <g>
[/quote]
<https://groups.google.com/g/rec.sport.golf/c/4Ekpa6LaLBo/m/SDx5Oyr6BgAJ>
To be honest, I think he (like so many of the wing-nuts on this group)
has finally become too ashamed of what he supported for so long.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 162:29:01 |
| Calls: | 12,095 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 15,000 |
| Messages: | 6,517,780 |