Whisper <
[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
On 15/07/2025 1:58 am, Sawfish wrote:> On 7/14/25 2:14 AM, Whisper wrote:> Maybe we've got a serious, long-term head-to-head competition on the > male side. Let's hope so.This is the 1st time we've seen real evidence of maybe Sinner ending up being the
greater player in the long run. He looks more unflappable and treats his career like a 'process', not putting pressure on specific matches. That's a unique way of managing your career, and very clever way of defusing pressure so he can play his best,
focus on process etc. He detracts himself from the psychological pressure. It's almost like an AI machine, Murderbot. It was on full display in FO the way he almost came back in the final.Carlos looked frustrated, for good reason. When you look at the
FO and Wimbledon finals combined Sinner is the same all the way through the 9 sets, no change in form or attitude, winning or losing. Carlos was having meltdowns in Wimbledon final. We don't see that volatility/instability from Sinner.The bad news for
Carlos is Sinner has won last 3 hardcourt slams and the next 2 are on hardcourt. It's going to take something special to stop him winning both. I always thought Carlos would be a big chance for a calendar slam, but now Sinner seems more certain to do
it.It really is scary for the rest of the field who look incapable of bridging the gap, it's just getting wider. Young Fonseca looks like the only hope to beat these 2 now and again in slams, but we'll have to see how consistent he'll be.
I'm a proponent of theory that for most people, outstanding slam wins are as draining as much as tough losses.
Both Federer and Djokovic were effectively done for 2019 after their Wimbledon match.
After 2012 AO, Nadal managed to win FO and was gone for an entire year, and Djokovic too.
It's how it is.
Alcaraz winning FO the way he did, it's almost as he feels uncomfortable winning again, undeserved winner? I'm not saying it's the case for him personally, but it's how psychology works. Survival guilt and other stuff.
So I assumed he won't be as sharp. He can't be. And I assumed the same for Sinner.
However we see that Sinner is certainly managing his emotions better. It's not that Alcaraz is bad, but this guy is so methodical, he's doing it all perfect.
Alcaraz felt less sharp overall, but Sinner only once, the way he came flat into the match with Dimitrov, he was ready for a shocking loss. Luckily for him he survived and then bounced back.
And most importantly, such bad days happen to everyone, you don't win all 7 matches easily, so I can't really connect the dots and say it has anything to do with FO.
So that's what impressed me the most about him. It seems FO left no mark on him.
Djokovic could have beaten Alcaraz, especially in this Wimbledon given that Alcaraz was a bit distracted, bit less sharp and surely has somewhat overplayed in recent months (he played finals everywhere from Monte Carlo, Barcelona, Rome, FO, Queens,
Wimbledon) and that Djokovic can embrace Alcaraz challenge, I thought Djokovic has a puncher's chance.
But he can't beat Sinner anymore, probably anywhere. So Sinner would win their SF and that's why he was my pick for the contest.
To me it says Sinner is the real deal, as it is now, he has perfected his game.
He knows any match he loses is a just percentage thing, he can't win them all, so he's not losing any sleep over it.
Ruthless approach.
It's what we all saw coming when we saw him in that COVID autumn 2020 FO when he played Nadal in QF.
This guy won't have much nerves if he ever plays USO final for the Grand Slam and he will do it.
--
----Android NewsGroup Reader----
https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)