• Re: 1 in a billion

    From Scall5@21:1/5 to Whisper on Sun Jun 22 11:14:36 2025
    On 6/22/2025 10:29 AM, Whisper wrote:


    Watching Alcaraz you get a feeling he's a 1 in a billion player. Million doesn't cut it for the way he's going about his business.  He's his own
    man and is doing it his way.  It's clear it's all about the slams for
    him and also having a good tune-up win leading in.  The rest of the time
    he treats it like an exhibition tour, no big deal if you lose
    meaningless matches/titles, even laugh along the way.

    Currently he's 2 time defending Wimbledon and 2 time defending FO champ
    - only Borg has ever done something like this.  He could be on 7 slams
    in about 3 months if the chips fall his way, maybe 8 by AO, all by age 22.

    Lehecka gave it everything, great effort sneaking a set out.  He uses my rackets so good to see : )

    I need new racquets, but Wilson doesn't make any that are 4 5/8" grip
    these days.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisper@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 23 01:29:15 2025
    Watching Alcaraz you get a feeling he's a 1 in a billion player.
    Million doesn't cut it for the way he's going about his business. He's
    his own man and is doing it his way. It's clear it's all about the
    slams for him and also having a good tune-up win leading in. The rest
    of the time he treats it like an exhibition tour, no big deal if you
    lose meaningless matches/titles, even laugh along the way.

    Currently he's 2 time defending Wimbledon and 2 time defending FO champ
    - only Borg has ever done something like this. He could be on 7 slams
    in about 3 months if the chips fall his way, maybe 8 by AO, all by age 22.

    Lehecka gave it everything, great effort sneaking a set out. He uses my rackets so good to see : )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 22 20:06:31 2025
    Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.2025 klo 18.29:


    Watching Alcaraz you get a feeling he's a 1 in a billion player. Million doesn't cut it for the way he's going about his business.  He's his own
    man and is doing it his way.  It's clear it's all about the slams for
    him and also having a good tune-up win leading in.  The rest of the time
    he treats it like an exhibition tour, no big deal if you lose
    meaningless matches/titles, even laugh along the way.

    Currently he's 2 time defending Wimbledon and 2 time defending FO champ
    - only Borg has ever done something like this.  He could be on 7 slams
    in about 3 months if the chips fall his way, maybe 8 by AO, all by age 22.

    Lehecka gave it everything, great effort sneaking a set out.  He uses my rackets so good to see : )

    That's why I said he's the goat. Certainly appears way more talented
    than Djokovic. The guy has everything.

    Different thing if that will translate to more slams. In a perfect world
    yes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 22 17:41:45 2025
    On 6/22/2025 12:06 PM, TT wrote:
    Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.2025 klo 18.29:


    Watching Alcaraz you get a feeling he's a 1 in a billion player.
    Million doesn't cut it for the way he's going about his business.
    He's his own man and is doing it his way.  It's clear it's all about
    the slams for him and also having a good tune-up win leading in.  The
    rest of the time he treats it like an exhibition tour, no big deal if
    you lose meaningless matches/titles, even laugh along the way.

    Currently he's 2 time defending Wimbledon and 2 time defending FO
    champ - only Borg has ever done something like this.  He could be on 7
    slams in about 3 months if the chips fall his way, maybe 8 by AO, all
    by age 22.

    Lehecka gave it everything, great effort sneaking a set out.  He uses
    my rackets so good to see : )

    That's why I said he's the goat. Certainly appears way more talented
    than Djokovic. The guy has everything.

    Different thing if that will translate to more slams. In a perfect world
    yes.

    I really enjoy watching Alcaraz play. Others I would include:
    Draper
    Shapovalov
    Popyrin
    Rublev (court antics)
    Medvedev (see above)
    Shelton
    Djokovic
    Fritz (not sure why, just do)
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 23 15:45:02 2025
    Scall5 kirjoitti 23.6.2025 klo 1.41:
    On 6/22/2025 12:06 PM, TT wrote:
    Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.2025 klo 18.29:


    Watching Alcaraz you get a feeling he's a 1 in a billion player.
    Million doesn't cut it for the way he's going about his business.
    He's his own man and is doing it his way.  It's clear it's all about
    the slams for him and also having a good tune-up win leading in.  The
    rest of the time he treats it like an exhibition tour, no big deal if
    you lose meaningless matches/titles, even laugh along the way.

    Currently he's 2 time defending Wimbledon and 2 time defending FO
    champ - only Borg has ever done something like this.  He could be on
    7 slams in about 3 months if the chips fall his way, maybe 8 by AO,
    all by age 22.

    Lehecka gave it everything, great effort sneaking a set out.  He uses
    my rackets so good to see : )

    That's why I said he's the goat. Certainly appears way more talented
    than Djokovic. The guy has everything.

    Different thing if that will translate to more slams. In a perfect
    world yes.

    I really enjoy watching Alcaraz play. Others I would include:
    Draper
    Shapovalov
    Popyrin
    Rublev (court antics)
    Medvedev (see above)
    Shelton
    Djokovic
    Fritz (not sure why, just do)

    Nice. For me it's just Carlos, Meds, Sinner & Djokovic that are
    interesting. Haven't actually watched Draper.


    Meds after losing the Halle final to Bublik...
    "I hope you're in Carlos' draw"... https://youtube.com/shorts/oCPlG-C2tLU?si=-agUtnEIJam72rpW

    :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Mon Jun 23 18:07:04 2025
    On 6/23/2025 12:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Scall5 kirjoitti 23.6.2025 klo 1.41:> On 6/22/2025 12:06 PM, TT wrote:>> Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.20

    No way I enjoy watching Medved. I can watch a highlight of his
    crazy moments later.
    You will be surprised, I would watch Alcaraz and Dimitrov and at
    times I can watch Sinner.

    I can watch Sinner and usually find myself cheering for him. I think he
    has maximized his true potential and not many can say that.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisper@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 20:12:00 2025
    On 24/06/2025 9:07 am, Scall5 wrote:
    On 6/23/2025 12:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Scall5 kirjoitti 23.6.2025 klo 1.41:> On 6/22/2025 12:06 PM, TT
    wrote:>> Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.20

    No way I enjoy watching Medved. I can watch a highlight of his
      crazy moments later.
    You will be surprised, I would watch Alcaraz and Dimitrov and at
      times I can watch Sinner.

    I can watch Sinner and usually find myself cheering for him. I think he
    has maximized his true potential and not many can say that.


    Yeah I think he has reached his peak. If he can stay near this level
    for a few years he'll do very well. Carlos has also upped his overall
    level with a beefed up serve, produced 33 aces in his last 2 matches a
    record for him. Even served 4 in a 1 game. He needs Sinner around to
    keep him sharp and improving. Sinner is at 95-100%, it feels like
    Carlos is at about 80%. Sinner at 100% and Carlos at 80% feels like a
    toss up, so if Carlos can play 90%+ v Sinner and in slams in general
    he'll win just about everything. The only question is how long can he
    keep up this explosive level? Maybe 3 more years, then he'll have to
    evolve other styles/tools to stay at the top. I've got a feeling he
    won't be winning slams in his 30's so let's see how much he can win in
    the meantime. I'm guessing, barring injury, he'll average 5 slams every
    2 years going forward, so 20 slams overall by age 28? It would be
    remarkable if he can beat at least 1 of the big 3 in slams. He has 5 but
    needs 20 more to beat Novak. Seems impossible even for him, but we'll
    know more in a couple years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to Whisper on Tue Jun 24 21:44:50 2025
    On 6/24/2025 5:12 AM, Whisper wrote:
    On 24/06/2025 9:07 am, Scall5 wrote:
    On 6/23/2025 12:24 PM, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Scall5 kirjoitti 23.6.2025 klo 1.41:> On 6/22/2025 12:06 PM, TT
    wrote:>> Whisper kirjoitti 22.6.20

    No way I enjoy watching Medved. I can watch a highlight of his
      crazy moments later.
    You will be surprised, I would watch Alcaraz and Dimitrov and at
      times I can watch Sinner.

    I can watch Sinner and usually find myself cheering for him. I think
    he has maximized his true potential and not many can say that.


    Yeah I think he has reached his peak.  If he can stay near this level
    for a few years he'll do very well.  Carlos has also upped his overall
    level with a beefed up serve, produced 33 aces in his last 2 matches a
    record for him.  Even served 4 in a 1 game.  He needs Sinner around to
    keep him sharp and improving.  Sinner is at 95-100%, it feels like
    Carlos is at about 80%. Sinner at 100% and Carlos at 80% feels like a
    toss up, so if Carlos can play 90%+ v Sinner and in slams in general
    he'll win just about everything.  The only question is how long can he
    keep up this explosive level?  Maybe 3 more years, then he'll have to
    evolve other styles/tools to stay at the top.  I've got a feeling he
    won't be winning slams in his 30's so let's see how much he can win in
    the meantime.  I'm guessing, barring injury, he'll average 5 slams every
    2 years going forward, so 20 slams overall by age 28?  It would be remarkable if he can beat at least 1 of the big 3 in slams. He has 5 but needs 20 more to beat Novak.  Seems impossible even for him, but we'll
    know more in a couple years.

    Good analysis.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)