Sawfish kirjoitti 6.6.2025 klo 23.49:
TT, do you think that a very large part of the motivation for the
creation of the modern state of Israel was a sort of collective victors' guilt over the fate of European Jewry during the Nazi era?
Obviously. That's what I always thought at least. It appears that I was
a bit off mark...
Let's ask Twitter's Grok your question.
TT:
do you think that a very large part of the motivation for the creation
of the modern state of Israel was a sort of collective victors' guilt
over the fate of European Jewry during the Nazi era?
GROK: (long answer, I read only the end...)
Conclusion: Collective guilt over the fate of European Jewry during the
Nazi era was a contributing factor, heightening moral and humanitarian arguments for a Jewish state. However, it was not the dominant
motivation. Longstanding Zionist aspirations, practical geopolitical strategies, and the need to address a post-war refugee crisis were
equally or more decisive. The "victors' guilt" idea captures part of the emotional and moral climate but risks oversimplifying a multifaceted
process.
Would you like me to delve deeper into any aspect—say, the Zionist
movement, the UN partition, or the role of specific nations?
TT:
"practical geopolitical strategies"?
GROK:
Certainly. "Practical geopolitical strategies" refers to the calculated, self-interested decisions by global powers that influenced the creation
of the modern state of Israel in 1948, beyond moral or humanitarian
concerns like guilt over the Holocaust. Here’s a breakdown of key examples:
British Interests and the Mandate: Britain controlled Palestine under a
League of Nations mandate from 1920, following the collapse of the
Ottoman Empire in World War I. Their strategy was to maintain stability
in the Middle East to secure trade routes (e.g., the Suez Canal), access
to oil, and a buffer against rival powers like France and later the
Soviets. Supporting a Jewish homeland via the 1917 Balfour Declaration
was partly a wartime tactic to gain Jewish support against Germany, but
by the 1930s and 1940s, Britain restricted Jewish immigration (e.g.,
1939 White Paper) to avoid alienating Arab states, whose goodwill was
critical for resources and regional influence. By 1947, exhausted from
World War II and facing Jewish and Arab unrest in Palestine, Britain
handed the issue to the UN, prioritizing withdrawal over resolving the conflict.
U.S. Strategic Goals: Post-World War II, the United States emerged as a superpower and saw a potential Jewish state as a democratic ally in a
volatile Middle East. With the Cold War dawning, supporting Israel
aligned with containing Soviet influence and securing a foothold near
oil-rich Arab states. President Truman backed the 1947 UN Partition Plan (dividing Palestine into Jewish and Arab states), partly for domestic
political gain—Jewish voters and lobbying groups like the American
Zionist movement were influential—but also to project U.S. power in a
region critical to global economics and security.
Soviet Calculations: The Soviet Union, surprisingly, also supported the
UN Partition Plan, despite its anti-Zionist stance later. In 1947, the
USSR saw backing Israel as a way to undermine British imperialism in the
Middle East, a key rival during the early Cold War. By endorsing a
Jewish state, they aimed to hasten Britain’s exit from Palestine and
gain favor with a potential new state, hoping to sway its alignment in
the East-West rivalry.
Regional Power Dynamics: The partition and Israel’s creation weren’t
just about great powers. Arab states opposed the plan, fearing a Jewish
state would disrupt their own political and territorial ambitions.
Meanwhile, Jewish leaders in Palestine, through groups like the Haganah,
built military and political structures, leveraging post-war chaos to
assert control. Global powers recognized that a new state—Jewish or Arab—would reshape alliances, trade, and influence in the region.
In essence, these strategies were "practical" because they prioritized
national interests—security, resources, and influence—over ideology or guilt. The Holocaust lent urgency, but decisions hinged on how a Jewish
state fit into the chessboard of post-war geopolitics. Want me to focus
on one country’s role or a specific aspect, like the UN vote or oil
politics?
...Well, that was educational.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)