• EU asks X for internal documents about algorithms as it steps up invest

    From =?UTF-8?Q?Pelle_Svansl=C3=B6s?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 16:40:04 2025
    The European Commission has asked X to hand over internal documents
    about its algorithms, as it steps up its investigation into whether Elon Musk’s social media platform has breached EU rules on content moderation.

    X has been under investigation since December 2023 under the EU’s
    content law – known as the Digital Services Act (DSA) – over how it
    tackles the spread of illegal content and information manipulation. The
    company has been accused of manipulating the platform’s systems to give far-right posts and politicians greater visibility over other political
    groups.

    The EU has come under growing pressure in recent weeks to take action
    after a series of interventions by Musk into European politics.

    “Today we are taking further steps to shed light on the compliance of
    X’s recommender systems with the obligations under the DSA,” the EU
    digital commissioner, Henna Virkkunen, said in a statement.

    The commission played down reports this week that it was reviewing its investigations against big tech companies, stressing that they were
    continuing as normal and Trump’s return to the White House did not
    affect its commitment to enforcing its laws.

    Johnny Ryan, a tech litigator, said it was “positive” that Virkkunen “is taking the opportunity to publicly signal that the EU will enforce its
    law on its soil”.

    He said the retention order was “an important step” and was used after
    the Romanian election manipulation involving TikTok.

    Some European politicians have accused Musk of meddling in elections,
    such as with his streamed conversation with Alice Weidel, the leader of
    the AfD, earlier this month. The commission has said Musk is free to
    speak his mind and can hold live streams with politicians but is
    assessing whether algorithms boost a single narrative and “shadow-ban” other views, posing a risk to fair elections.

    Musk has said the criticism is an affront to democracy and free speech.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2025/jan/17/eu-asks-x-for-internal-documents-about-algorithms-as-it-steps-up-investigation

    Just ban X, formerly Twitter. And cook up the offences later. It's of no
    use to anybody with an attention span.

    --
    “We need to acknowledge he let us down. He went down a path he shouldn’t have, and we shouldn’t have followed him. We shouldn’t have listened to him, and we can’t let that happen ever again”.
    -- Nikki Haley

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 17:28:59 2025
    Pelle Svanslös kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 16.40:
    Musk has said the criticism is an affront to democracy and free speech.

    And he's correct.
    It's nothing but an attempt to silence critics & free speech.

    "Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So was Stalin.
    If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor of
    freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you're
    not in favor of free speech." – Noam Chomsky.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Jan 21 17:03:23 2025
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Pelle Svanslös kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 16.40:> Musk has said the criticism is an affront to democracy and free speech.And he's correct.It's nothing but an attempt to silence critics & free speech."Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he
    liked. So was Stalin. If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you're not in favor of free speech." – Noam Chomsky.


    Well then nobody is in favour of free speech.

    Who wants to listen stuff he doesn't like?


    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 18:35:59 2025
    *skriptis kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 18.03:
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Pelle Svanslös kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 16.40:> Musk has said the criticism is an affront to democracy and free speech.And he's correct.It's nothing but an attempt to silence critics & free speech."Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he
    liked. So was Stalin. If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise. Otherwise, you're not in favor of free speech." – Noam Chomsky.


    Well then nobody is in favour of free speech.

    Who wants to listen stuff he doesn't like?



    https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1881695982129394006

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TT@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 21 22:33:55 2025
    Sawfish kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 19.15:
    On 1/21/25 8:35 AM, TT wrote:
    *skriptis kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 18.03:
    TT <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    Pelle Svanslös kirjoitti 21.1.2025 klo 16.40:> Musk has said the
    criticism is an affront to democracy and free speech.And he's
    correct.It's nothing but an attempt to silence critics & free
    speech."Goebbels was in favor of free speech for views he liked. So
    was Stalin. If you're really in favor of free speech, then you're in
    favor of freedom of speech for precisely the views you despise.
    Otherwise, you're not in favor of free speech." – Noam Chomsky.


    Well then nobody is in favour of free speech.

    Who wants to listen stuff he doesn't like?



    https://x.com/disclosetv/status/1881695982129394006

    Being from the US and observing the expansion of the EU from what seemed
    like a common market, to a supernational governing body, sorta like the Vatican, is it really anything more than, say the Red Queen's (from
    Alice and Wonderland) domain? Kinda a fantasy that stands simply because
    it *says* it stands?

    I mean, it differs from a traditional European nation in that these
    nations' borders correspond roughly to ethnic territories, and therefore
    have a kind of "blood loyalty", from the gut, whereas the EU cannot by definition have this. It has a sort of ideological loyalty, and anyone
    should know by now, ideology, as opposed to blood, is fickle as hell.

    I don't see why anyone in Europe would be in favour of EU these days...
    Other than some EU elected politicians who benefit from EU salaries and
    maybe countries which are net recipients.

    Other than that it's a failed concept, lots of bureaucracy &
    decentralized decision making.

    Look what EU did to us. This is Brussels! Belgium!

    https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1881748041881067581

    People who allowed this should be executed. They destroyed Europe.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)