• Re: Re:Now I am convinced that this guy is a cheater and a doper

    From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Tue Oct 29 21:17:53 2024
    PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> wrote:
    [-- text/plain, size 0.4K, charset windows-1252, 15 lines, encoding 7bit --]

    PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    https://www.tiktok.com/@eurosport/video/7430377636502834464-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    And this is a guy that is clean

    https://www.tiktok.com/@tennischannel/video/7430956813996248366

    They are both heavy dopers, that's for sure. Nothing wrong
    with it. You have to do it to make it to the top.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Wed Oct 30 13:50:33 2024
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:
    Nothing wrong with it except it's against the rules..

    The rules mean nothing. The glory of winning big
    tournaments and making tons of money is all that
    matters.

    I *want* them to use doping. It means better quality
    tennis for us spectators.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Thu Oct 31 06:07:39 2024
    [email protected] (Kalevi Kolttonen) Wrote in message:r
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:> Nothing wrong with it except it's against the rules..The rules mean nothing. The glory of winning bigtournaments and making tons of money is all thatmatters.I *want* them to use doping. It means better
    qualitytennis for us spectators.br,KK


    But not all would want to use doping, risk their health.

    So in effect you'd get a smaller pool of players pushing themselves beyond normal level, but not all, so in the end, do you even get better quality?

    It's debatable.

    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to All on Thu Oct 31 10:26:48 2024
    On 10/31/2024 12:07 AM, *skriptis wrote:
    [email protected] (Kalevi Kolttonen) Wrote in message:r
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:> Nothing wrong with it except it's against the rules..The rules mean nothing. The glory of winning bigtournaments and making tons of money is all thatmatters.I *want* them to use doping. It means better
    qualitytennis for us spectators.br,KK


    But not all would want to use doping, risk their health.

    So in effect you'd get a smaller pool of players pushing themselves beyond normal level, but not all, so in the end, do you even get better quality?

    It's debatable.

    This makes a lot of sense. You see previous dopers and many have serious
    health issues later in life. Hell, Lance Armstrong had cancer *while* he
    was a cyclist. Personally, I wouldn't take illegal (and unknown)
    substances because of the risk, regardless how good I was at a specific
    sport.

    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Oct 31 17:46:49 2024
    Scall5 <[email protected]> Wrote in message:
    This makes a lot of sense. You see previous dopers and many have serious health issues later in life. Hell, Lance Armstrong had cancer *while* he was a cyclist. Personally, I wouldn't take illegal (and unknown) substances because of the risk,
    regardless how good I was at a specific sport.-- ---------------Scall5



    Agreed.

    And I would like to correct myself.

    Doping would increase quality, but assuming other players don't quit the game. Which they probably would, so that's my point about quality decreasing.

    E.g. if two big 3 members started doping the quality would improve compared to all big 3 guys not doping, but what if third guy quit the game (or doesn't even pursue tennis career) if he knows he can't win without doping?

    So overall, we get less quality.

    Most probable scenario.




    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Oct 31 17:32:15 2024
    Scall5 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Personally, I wouldn't take illegal (and unknown)
    substances because of the risk, regardless how
    good I was at a specific sport.

    The doping substances come in many different
    forms. Some are potentially dangerous, some
    are not.

    Amphetamine and its derivatives like in Adderal
    are very safe. Yes, if you take too much and
    lose sleep for days, you can end up with
    psychosis, but so what? It will heal. You don't
    stay psychotic for very long.

    We need to realize that the "speed" dosages in
    tennis circles are carefully controlled and do not
    lead to sleeplessness and psychosis.

    When running on "speed", you could risk physical
    injuries, though, because you are then hyperactive,
    full of energy and perhaps overall less sensitive to
    react to pain. So you might injure your wrist like
    Thiem did or you could slightly damage your muscles
    by overworking them. However, you have no risk of
    destroying your internal organs or developing cancer.

    Your life will not be in danger.

    All in all, despite some possible drawbacks, controlled
    use of "speed" is very good for tennis players. That's
    why at least half of the Top 100 players have faked ADHD
    diagnosis so that they can boost their game with Adderal
    and similar substances. That is pretty cool!

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Fri Nov 1 23:05:28 2024
    Kalevi Kolttonen <[email protected]> wrote:
    You can also use anabolic steroids if you do it *wisely*.
    In other words, it must be carefully controlled usage
    dictated by doctor's orders.

    One more famous example that everyone knows: Mister
    Arnold Schwarzenegger. He is now 77 years old. Please do
    not claim that Arnie did not use doping when he
    won those Mr. Olympia titles. No way he was clean!!!

    Hahahahah!

    His old friend Franco Columbo used steroids too.

    Arnie was smart enough to limit his usage to
    sensible amounts so he stayed healthy. Nowadays
    bodybuilding is sicker than ever and doping kills
    those bodybuilder bastards very effectively.

    But I do not care as long as they commit slow suicide
    consciously: Some people do not want to live
    for long, they want big muscles and do not
    care about the horrible consequences. It is a
    free world, feel free to do anything you want
    with your mind and body.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Fri Nov 1 22:19:02 2024
    PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> wrote:
    So would you please state for us doping substances
    that aren't harmful?

    Do not be childish. Do not believe the scare
    propaganda.

    Amphetamine and its derivatives are very safe to use.

    You can also use anabolic steroids if you do it *wisely*.
    In other words, it must be carefully controlled usage
    dictated by doctor's orders.

    A Finnish weight lifting legend Kaarlo Kangasniemi
    is now 83 years old:

    https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kaarlo_Kangasniemi

    He won Olympic Gold in Mexico in 1968. Back in those
    days, using doping was allowed. Kaarlo has openly
    admitted that he used anabolic steroids to improve
    his results. He tested them with his dog first.

    Juha Mieto, a famous Finnish skiier asked Kaarlo
    for advice on how to use doping. I guess it was in
    1975. Kaarlo has told this to the public, but Mieto
    pretends he never used doping! Hahahah! :-)

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Fri Nov 1 21:32:21 2024
    On 11/1/2024 6:05 PM, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    Kalevi Kolttonen <[email protected]> wrote:
    You can also use anabolic steroids if you do it *wisely*.
    In other words, it must be carefully controlled usage
    dictated by doctor's orders.

    One more famous example that everyone knows: Mister
    Arnold Schwarzenegger. He is now 77 years old. Please do
    not claim that Arnie did not use doping when he
    won those Mr. Olympia titles. No way he was clean!!!

    Hahahahah!

    His old friend Franco Columbo used steroids too.

    Arnie was smart enough to limit his usage to
    sensible amounts so he stayed healthy. Nowadays
    bodybuilding is sicker than ever and doping kills
    those bodybuilder bastards very effectively.

    But I do not care as long as they commit slow suicide
    consciously: Some people do not want to live
    for long, they want big muscles and do not
    care about the horrible consequences. It is a
    free world, feel free to do anything you want
    with your mind and body.

    br,
    KK

    I agree with your point; "It is a free world, feel free to do anything
    you want with your mind and body." As long as one isn't driving a motor
    vehicle or somehow affecting others.
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisper@21:1/5 to PeteWasLucky on Sat Nov 2 21:05:24 2024
    On 30/10/2024 3:10 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:
    PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    https://www.tiktok.com/@eurosport/video/7430377636502834464-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    And this is a guy that is clean

    https://www.tiktok.com/@tennischannel/video/7430956813996248366




    What did you expect him to say lol? Sinner said the money was
    'important' but not why he's playing tennis. Carlos didn't get into
    tennis for the money, none of the greats did. The best players in the
    amateur era went to the pro tour just for the money, eg Pancho, Laver,
    Rosewall etc.

    There is nothing wrong with the way Sinner answered this question. Why
    are all the women playing in Saudi Arabia? Money is a huge motivation
    for everyone. Silly question, let's not give it air time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisper@21:1/5 to Kalevi Kolttonen on Sat Nov 2 21:07:42 2024
    On 31/10/2024 12:50 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:
    Nothing wrong with it except it's against the rules..

    The rules mean nothing. The glory of winning big
    tournaments and making tons of money is all that
    matters.

    I *want* them to use doping. It means better quality
    tennis for us spectators.

    br,
    KK


    If it means less players pulling out of matches due to injury I'm all
    for it to. I went to AO this year and paid big $ for 12 Rod Laver arena matches, 4 pulled out due to injury. Ridiculous.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Nov 2 11:15:12 2024
    Scall5 <[email protected]> wrote:
    I agree with your point; "It is a free world, feel free to do anything
    you want with your mind and body." As long as one isn't driving a motor vehicle or somehow affecting others.

    Exactly.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From *skriptis@21:1/5 to Whisper on Sat Nov 2 11:27:26 2024
    Whisper <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    On 30/10/2024 3:10 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:> PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r>> https://www.tiktok.com/@eurosport/video/7430377636502834464-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/
    index.html> > And this is a guy that is clean> > https://www.tiktok.com/@tennischannel/video/7430956813996248366> > What did you expect him to say lol? Sinner said the money was 'important' but not why he's playing tennis. Carlos didn't get into tennis
    for the money, none of the greats did. The best players in the amateur era went to the pro tour just for the money, eg Pancho, Laver, Rosewall etc.There is nothing wrong with the way Sinner answered this question. Why are all the women playing in Saudi
    Arabia? Money is a huge motivation for everyone. Silly question, let's not give it air time.



    Maybe I'm wrong, but if something was "most lucrative tennis tournament ever" I'd want to win that, and not merely because of money.

    But because of bragging rights too.


    There's a bit of glory everywhere and these top guys chase glory.


    --




    ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Whisper@21:1/5 to All on Sat Nov 2 21:42:04 2024
    On 2/11/2024 9:27 pm, *skriptis wrote:
    Whisper <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r
    On 30/10/2024 3:10 am, PeteWasLucky wrote:> PeteWasLucky <[email protected]> Wrote in message:r>> https://www.tiktok.com/@eurosport/video/7430377636502834464-- ----Android NewsGroup Reader----https://piaohong.s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/usenet/
    index.html> > And this is a guy that is clean> > https://www.tiktok.com/@tennischannel/video/7430956813996248366> > What did you expect him to say lol? Sinner said the money was 'important' but not why he's playing tennis. Carlos didn't get into tennis
    for the money, none of the greats did. The best players in the amateur era went to the pro tour just for the money, eg Pancho, Laver, Rosewall etc.There is nothing wrong with the way Sinner answered this question. Why are all the women playing in Saudi
    Arabia? Money is a huge motivation for everyone. Silly question, let's not give it air time.



    Maybe I'm wrong, but if something was "most lucrative tennis tournament ever" I'd want to win that, and not merely because of money.

    But because of bragging rights too.


    There's a bit of glory everywhere and these top guys chase glory.




    Absolutely. I remember the 'Grand Slam Cup' 30 years ago paid $2 mil to
    the winner - that was huge money back then. Nothing wrong with it.
    Good luck to the players who were there at the right time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to jdeluise on Sat Nov 2 23:06:20 2024
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:
    And trans women in women's sports? They're not
    hurting anyone either, eh?

    Like I have previously said: I do not give a flying
    fuck about women's sports. Yeah, I sometimes watch
    semis and finals in tennis Grand Slam events, but
    other than that, I never watch WTA1000 or lesser
    events.

    In almost all cases, women's sports is simply
    inferior, class B entertainment compared to men's
    sports. So yes, trans women can compete in women's
    events, it makes no difference to me at all.

    But sports is really strange: Even in events where
    gender should not matter, they still have
    separate classes, e.g. think of various kind of
    shooting and chess.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scall5@21:1/5 to Whisper on Sat Nov 2 23:03:09 2024
    On 11/2/2024 5:07 AM, Whisper wrote:
    On 31/10/2024 12:50 am, Kalevi Kolttonen wrote:
    jdeluise <[email protected]> wrote:
    Nothing wrong with it except it's against the rules..

    The rules mean nothing. The glory of winning big
    tournaments and making tons of money is all that
    matters.

    I *want* them to use doping. It means better quality
    tennis for us spectators.

    br,
    KK


    If it means less players pulling out of matches due to injury I'm all
    for it to.  I went to AO this year and paid big $ for 12 Rod Laver arena matches, 4 pulled out due to injury.  Ridiculous.

    Perhaps some of those who pulled out because they were doping? When one
    puts "juice" into their body, there is a chance that their tendons and ligaments cannot support the additional muscle mass/strength from these "supplements"...
    --
    ---------------
    Scall5

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kalevi Kolttonen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sun Nov 3 12:32:28 2024
    Scall5 <[email protected]> wrote:
    Perhaps some of those who pulled out because they were doping? When one
    puts "juice" into their body, there is a chance that their tendons and ligaments cannot support the additional muscle mass/strength from these "supplements"...

    I tend to agree. It is my gut feeling that doping
    increases injuries.

    Not just for the reasons given by Scall5, but
    because of amphetamine too.

    br,
    KK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)