El jueves, 25 de noviembre de 1999, 5:00:00 (UTC-3), DavidC escribió:
I recently asked about substitutes for the incredibly costly
8950 tube. I found a discussion on DejaNews about this and
there was a suggestion that 6KG6A's are excellent.
I looked closely at the facts and there seem to be several
significant differences between the 8950 and all of the other
suggested substitutes. I don't understand how a 6KD6 or
6KG6 could be "forced into" a 8950 tube socket.
The 6KG6 is a Novar and I suppose the 6KD6 could fit in the
6KG6 socket but I don't think the 8950 is even close.
I think maybe folks meant that after the amp was modified from an
8950 to a 6KG6 one could substitute a 6KD6 for the 6KG6.
Can someone clarify please?
- Thanks again & Happy Thanksgiving to all! DavidC K1YP
**************************************************
* Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com * The Internet's Discussion Network *
* The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet - Free! *
The 6KD6 tube is of a 12-contact base the same as the 8950 tube. The only difference is that in the 6KD6 tube the leg 6 is free without connection while in the 8950 tube it is attached to the leg 2 which is the cathode connection
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)