On 29/12/2022 06:24, RichA wrote:
Because they're reached a peak of their meagre imaging capabilities.
Until flat "nano" lenses appear, they are stuck with their current capabilities.
Even then, better sensors are a myth. There may be serviceable zoom modules on the horizon which will obviously help, but the only way to "improve" image quality is to fake it with A.I.
So is post-processing the camera any different from post-processing by a human?
When is "image quality" good enough rather than being ultimately perfect?
Personally I have no objection to a camera which can - by itself - align and stack low-light images, or to one which can - by itself - produce near-perfect panoramas. It not only saves me precious time, but expands my photo opportunities.
Suits me, may not suit you.
--
Cheers,
David
Web:
https://www.satsignal.eu
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)