--
Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
--
Tony Cooper - Orlando Florida
I read and post to this group as a form of entertainment.
This is my effort at repair:
https://folio.ink/dbzQAR
David Brooks wrote:
This one is rather worse for wear! I can't recall how it got into such
a
state! https://ibb.co/2F0zNVp
Couldn't help taking a crack at it. I cleaned up the sky and brought
in a little color in the sky. The sky shouldn't compete with the
figures, so I went for just a little color. Cloned out a number of
problems in the figures, but didn't work on the faces. Too little to
work with.
Cleaned up the yellow in the sign. Ran it through a High Pass filter/Overlay. Removed the "annotation" because viewers don't care
what was done.
Anytime you're working with scans of old photos, the quality of the
finished job will depend on the quality of the scan. This was a poor
scan to begin with.
This is my effort at repair:
https://folio.ink/dbzQAR
On 11/05/2022 00:33, Tony Cooper wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
This one is rather worse for wear! I can't recall how it got into such
a
state! https://ibb.co/2F0zNVp
Couldn't help taking a crack at it. I cleaned up the sky and brought
in a little color in the sky. The sky shouldn't compete with the
figures, so I went for just a little color. Cloned out a number of
problems in the figures, but didn't work on the faces. Too little to
work with.
Cleaned up the yellow in the sign. Ran it through a High Pass
filter/Overlay. Removed the "annotation" because viewers don't care
what was done.
Anytime you're working with scans of old photos, the quality of the
finished job will depend on the quality of the scan. This was a poor
scan to begin with.
This is my effort at repair:
https://folio.ink/dbzQAR
You are a bit of a star, Tony! ??
Very many thanks. :-D
I didn't pay attention to the size, and the image I downloaded is only
567 x 800 at 72 ppi. That's OK for web viewing, but if you want it at
4" x 6" at 300 ppi for printing if that's the desired use here it is:
https://folio.ink/WjnN7m
On Wed, 11 May 2022 23:20:10 +0100, David Brooks
<[email protected]> wrote:
On 11/05/2022 00:33, Tony Cooper wrote:
David Brooks wrote:
This one is rather worse for wear! I can't recall how it got into such
a
state! https://ibb.co/2F0zNVp
Couldn't help taking a crack at it. I cleaned up the sky and brought
in a little color in the sky. The sky shouldn't compete with the
figures, so I went for just a little color. Cloned out a number of
problems in the figures, but didn't work on the faces. Too little to
work with.
Cleaned up the yellow in the sign. Ran it through a High Pass
filter/Overlay. Removed the "annotation" because viewers don't care
what was done.
Anytime you're working with scans of old photos, the quality of the
finished job will depend on the quality of the scan. This was a poor
scan to begin with.
This is my effort at repair:
https://folio.ink/dbzQAR
You are a bit of a star, Tony! ??
Very many thanks. :-D
I didn't pay attention to the size, and the image I downloaded is only
567 x 800 at 72 ppi. That's OK for web viewing, but if you want it at
4" x 6" at 300 ppi for printing if that's the desired use here it is:
https://folio.ink/WjnN7m
On 12/05/2022 04:52, Tony Cooper wrote:
I didn't pay attention to the size, and the image I downloaded is only
567 x 800 at 72 ppi. That's OK for web viewing, but if you want it at
4" x 6" at 300 ppi for printing if that's the desired use here it is:
https://folio.ink/WjnN7mThanks, Tony.
--
Cheers,
David
Web: http://www.satsignal.eu
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 167:31:59 |
| Calls: | 12,096 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,812 |