• =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_Google=e2=80=99s_AI_Is_Churning_Out_a_Deluge_of_Compl?= =

    From bfh@21:1/5 to Mike Van Pelt on Wed May 29 13:11:51 2024
    Mike Van Pelt wrote:
    In article <rn45O.43762$[email protected]>, bfh <[email protected]> wrote:
    What I further allege is that I hope medical professionals are not -
    and will not - rely too heavily on these damthings for medical
    diagnoses and treatments.

    Depends on the training set. If the medical "simulated
    intelligence" is trained on actual medical diagnoses, including
    all the "what we found out later that we missed on first
    examination" cases, it looks like it can be really valuable,
    at least as first line screening. Some of the studies seem
    to be pretty spectacular at picking up stuff.

    Keep it way, way, WAY away from Reddit, FaceBook, and all
    those "Doctors hate this!" "Kill your belly fat!" clickbaity
    quackpottery ads that most news web pages are flooded with.


    What?! What?! Are you implying that Relief Factor, Balance of Nature,
    Relaxium, and CoQ10 don't work? damn. Where's the man with the Texaco
    star when you really need him?

    --
    bill
    Theory don't mean squat if it don't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)