On 15/05/2025 3:39 am, Norbert wrote:
This is an easy one for me. I]d remove "Polythene Pam" and "Mean Mr.
Mustard." They are not on par with McCartney's sections, all of which
are outstanding.
They aren't part of 'the medley' !
On 15/05/2025 3:38 pm, Geoff wrote:
On 15/05/2025 3:39 am, Norbert wrote:
This is an easy one for me. I]d remove "Polythene Pam" and "Mean Mr.
Mustard." They are not on par with McCartney's sections, all of which
are outstanding.
They aren't part of 'the medley' !
Well, I guess they are part of 'a' medley MMM/PP/SCITTBR, but not the generally-recognised medley starting with Golden Slumbers.
This is an easy one for me. I]d remove "Polythene Pam" and "Mean Mr. Mustard." They are not on par with McCartney's sections, all of which
are outstanding.
It seems to be accurate to the last detail, and I respect the discipline involved.
However, I prefer covers in which the artist adds his individuality to
the project, such as Fats Domino's "e and My Monkey," the ho's
"Summertime Blues and Shaking All Over," and Rush's "Mr. Soul" and
"Heart Full of Soul."
Who said anything about "just a cover"?
Wat this guy did seems like a note-for-note recreation of the piece.
The alternate versions of songs I mentioned approach the songs
differently.
It's the bloody Beatles Abbey Road album. Shut up.
On 2025-05-19 01:38:09 +0000, Nil said:
It's the bloody Beatles Abbey Road album. Shut up.
Didn't Paulie say that about the White Album (recent reissue)
originally, that came off as kind of arrogant to some.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 17:36:32 |
| Calls: | 12,103 |
| Calls today: | 3 |
| Files: | 15,004 |
| Messages: | 6,518,073 |