On 27.05.2023 20:46, RecRanger wrote:
On Saturday, May 27, 2023 at 12:03:54 PM UTC-4, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
I am wearing armor that has a passive fire counter-attack, and in
Vlad's tower I saw this monster that is vulnerable to fire:
I have to correct myself; the passive fire counter-attack stems from
the Candle of Eternal Flame that I am carrying. (Not sure the actual
source of that passive counter-attack matters.)
Status of the shadow ogre (male, chaotic): Level 15 HP 101(101)
AC -2, vulnerable to fire.
The shadow ogre touches you! The shadow ogre is suddenly on fire!
Your armor does not appear to affect the shadow ogre
Maybe this meant that another armor property was ineffective, maybe
that of the deep dragon scaled armor? - Is there a passive draining
effect of that type of armor armor?
(Anyway that message could have been made more informative, like
"Your armor's <property> does not appear to affect the <monster>.")
How is that (ineffectivity-)message to be interpreted here?
There are several monsters in EvilHack that do this. There are several weaknesses (just elemental?) that do not work. I think it _may_ be longstanding bug that is yet to be figured out?
I don't know.
Janis
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)