1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.GAMES.FRP.DND

  • Re: Good News - "Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves" Comes to Prim

    From Spalls Hurgenson@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 29 12:55:16 2023
    On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:38:06 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    [email protected] wrote:
    Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Not sure when this came to Prime from Pee+, but I'm glad it has.
    I'll try to get to it soon...


    I tried watching the new D&D movie. I really did. Everyone told me how
    it was such an improvement over the originals, and how well it
    captured the game. But I couldn't get past the 30 minute mark.

    The 1999 D&D movie was awful too, but in the 'so-bad-it's-good' sort
    of way. At the very least, that one had the wonderfully over-the-top performance of Jeremy Irons to keep us entertained. But this new one?
    I couldn't get into it at all.

    Maybe had I stuck with it, my impression of the movie would have been
    better. But I struggled to keep watching even those first 30 minutes,
    and nothing the movie showed me indicated there would be a sudden
    reversal further on.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Tue Aug 29 17:40:22 2023
    Spalls Hurgenson <[email protected]> writes:

    On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:38:06 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    [email protected] wrote:
    Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Not sure when this came to Prime from Pee+, but I'm glad it has.
    I'll try to get to it soon...


    I tried watching the new D&D movie. I really did. Everyone told me how
    it was such an improvement over the originals, and how well it
    captured the game. But I couldn't get past the 30 minute mark.

    The 1999 D&D movie was awful too, but in the 'so-bad-it's-good' sort
    of way. At the very least, that one had the wonderfully over-the-top performance of Jeremy Irons to keep us entertained. But this new one?
    I couldn't get into it at all.

    Maybe had I stuck with it, my impression of the movie would have been
    better. But I struggled to keep watching even those first 30 minutes,
    and nothing the movie showed me indicated there would be a sudden
    reversal further on.

    It felt a hell of a lot like D&D in places, where I was thinking "oh boy I can envision exactly how this sequence would have played out on a table
    top", and some parts felt like the "players" just plain got a bad roll
    and had to go to the next thing. Their uses of the portal rod in
    also felt like things players would do.

    Jeremy Irons was a high point of the old movie, but he was the only high
    point. Hugh Grant was fun, though, and in general the characters were
    able to be kind of jokey without falling too badly into the modern habit
    of just saying "uhhh, AWKward!" and "so THAT just happened" (kill me)

    Also they used practical effects a bunch and I appreciate that.


    john

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Justisaur@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Tue Aug 29 18:09:23 2023
    On Tuesday, August 29, 2023 at 9:55:27 AM UTC-7, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 04:38:06 -0400, Ubiquitous <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    [email protected] wrote:
    Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Not sure when this came to Prime from Pee+, but I'm glad it has.
    I'll try to get to it soon...
    I tried watching the new D&D movie. I really did. Everyone told me how
    it was such an improvement over the originals, and how well it
    captured the game. But I couldn't get past the 30 minute mark.

    The 1999 D&D movie was awful too, but in the 'so-bad-it's-good' sort
    of way. At the very least, that one had the wonderfully over-the-top performance of Jeremy Irons to keep us entertained. But this new one?
    I couldn't get into it at all.

    Maybe had I stuck with it, my impression of the movie would have been better. But I struggled to keep watching even those first 30 minutes,
    and nothing the movie showed me indicated there would be a sudden
    reversal further on.

    I enjoyed it. Only D&D movie that actually captures D&D. Something just
    feels off with it though, just too cgi and vibrant or something. I thought it odd JI didn't seem to have any actual class or be able to do anything.
    On the other hand I've been witness to a few players/character that just
    kept failing or not being able to do anything too.

    I kind of liked the 1999 movie too, but it was a train-wreck. Which also captures a number of D&D games I've played in. :)

    - Justisaur

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ubiquitous@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Aug 31 04:45:35 2023
    [email protected] wrote:
    Ubiquitous <[email protected]> wrote:
    [email protected] wrote:
    Ian J. Ball <[email protected]d> wrote:

    Not sure when this came to Prime from Pee+, but I'm glad it has.
    I'll try to get to it soon...


    I tried watching the new D&D movie. I really did. Everyone told me how
    it was such an improvement over the originals, and how well it
    captured the game. But I couldn't get past the 30 minute mark.

    The 1999 D&D movie was awful too, but in the 'so-bad-it's-good' sort
    of way. At the very least, that one had the wonderfully over-the-top >performance of Jeremy Irons to keep us entertained. But this new one?
    I couldn't get into it at all.

    Maybe had I stuck with it, my impression of the movie would have been
    better. But I struggled to keep watching even those first 30 minutes,
    and nothing the movie showed me indicated there would be a sudden
    reversal further on.

    My expectations were low but I found myself enjoying it.

    --
    Let's go Brandon!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)