On Saturday, March 27, 2010 at 3:05:03 PM UTC-4, Bob M wrote:
You play Bergen Raises where 1M-3C is a simple raise (6-10) with 4+
cards and 1M-3D is a limit raise (11-12) with 4+ cards. Is there much
gained (if anything) in reversing the meaning of these raises and
playing Reverse Bergen Raises?
It appears that that on the auction 1S-3C room is gained for slam
bidding investigation when this raise becomes the limit raise. What is
the "usual" meaning of opener's non-jump new suit rebids and 3NT after
1S-3C? Also, what should responder do?
Here are 4 limit raise hands that you hold. After 1S-3C what's your
bid as responder after opener has made a non-jump new suit rebid or
3NT?
From Eddie Kantar (from an early version of RKB)-
(1) T 9 6 3 2, K 5, A J 9, 8 4 3
(2) Q T 5 2, A 3, J 9 5, K T 8 7
(3) Q T 5 2, 9 3, 7 4 2, A K T 8
From Root/Pavlicek "Modern Bridge Conventions" -
(4) K T 8 4, 3, A 9 8 4 2, 5 4 3
That included the note:
"Your excellent high card quality and distribution
make this hand well worth a limit raise".
Bob M
I most often use 3C as 7-12 and 3D as 3-card limit instead of F1NT & then 3 of opener's. I see the ability to protect against 4th & 5th seat getting in over F1NT. Also, the 1NT response is now semi-force. If opener cares if I have 7-9 or 10+, he bids
3D. If not, he rebids 3 of his suit. With the lower range, I rebid opener at 3 level. If 10+, I bid something else since partner wants to go to game. Vern
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)