In article <uckkgr$27r60$
[email protected]>,
Bertel Lund Hansen <
[email protected]> wrote:
Kenny McCormack wrote:
That's the problem with making all this stuff browser based. It always
ends up being browser-dependent, and usually ends up working only with MS's >> browser.
It was so much better when BBO ran as a normal Windows EXE file.
OK, I'll play.
Linux, Mac and OS/2 users wouldn't be so happy with that solution.
It is actually pretty easy to run (simple) Windows apps (including BBO)
on other OSes.
I have personally run BBO (via Windows emulation) on both Linux and Mac.
I've never been able to get the browser version to run under either of
those OSes - because, as I said, this stuff usually ends up only working (fully/correctly) with MS's browsers anyway.
And as for OS/2 users, you mean both of them, right? And note that I am speaking as a former big OS/2 user/supporter/advocate. OS/2 really doesn't exist anymore (in the consumer sphere). I think they're calling whatever remains of it "eCom station" (or something like that) nowadays.
And if you dream about a Windows program - then why are you unhappy with >things only working in a Windows browser?
See above. I knew someone would make this objection; failing to see that a Windows application is best, even if you don't run (or like) Windows.
Windows is (or should be) kind of a "lingua franca" or Esperanto-like thing.
--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4 lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/ForFoxViewers
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)