On Sunday, November 5, 2023 at 7:40:54 AM UTC-5, BlueDice wrote:
On Saturday, November 4, 2023 at 5:07:56 PM UTC, Timothy Chow wrote:
XGID=-C-CbBB-B---aB---b-bcabb-A:0:0:1:44:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game +13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O O O O |
| X O | | O O O O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| | X | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | X X |
| X | | X X O X X |
| O X | | X X O X X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 101 O: 112 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 44
---
Tim Chow
I would play the mundane 13/9 13/5 but I suspect I'm missing something here ....
--
BD
Being that it's a problem it's a lot easier to find the candidate plays and not let one slip by the catcher. A game I played just this past week was "always make the second best play". It's a variant where your single goal is to make the second best
play. It forces you to weigh candidates you normally wouldn't because often times the best play is the best play and it's not close. While I rarely do this OtB, every now and again a confusing position comes up where I do force myself to pick what I
would play if I didn't make Play A. This isn't one of the positions where I'd do such a thing OtB but as a problem if you 'think you're missing something' then you should more closely examine the candidate plays.
So, did you consider 13/1 originally?
Stick
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)