On 10/18/2023 11:10 AM, ah....Clem wrote:
XGID=--ab-CCBBA--AAba-b-cbb--B-:0:0:1:62:0:0:3:0:10
X:Player 1 O:Player 2
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O O | | O O O X |
| O O | | O O O X |
| | | O |
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | X X |
| X X | | X X O |
| X X X X | | X X O O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 145 O: 151 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 62
Tough call. When the opponent has made an advanced anchor, or even
the 3pt anchor as in this position, and we're still on the 24pt, then
that is usually a strong indication that we need to split. This is
especially true if we're ahead in the pip count and facing a serious
priming threat. So that would suggest 24/18, and then I guess 9/7 to
reduce our blot count.
On the other hand, the main alternative play I see, 9/4 6/4, makes a
five-prime and uses our spare on the 6pt efficiently. It also
equalizes board strength. OTB, I think I would go for the five-prime,
but it wouldn't shock me to learn that the bot prefers to split.
---
Tim Chow
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)