On Tuesday, July 25, 2023 at 1:58:37 PM UTC+1, Timothy Chow wrote:
XGID=--B-CCBaC-----------ccecB-:1:1:1:63:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| | | O O O O X |
| | | O O O O X |
| | | O O O O |
| | | O |
| | | O |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| X | | X X | +---+
| X | | X X X X | | 2 |
| X O | | X X X X | +---+
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 115 O: 66 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 2, X own cube
X to play 63
I'm Walting this one.
As soon as I've opined, I'll observe whether Ah..Clem
thinks my suggestion is as useful as a film recommendation
by Arnold Schwarzenegger.
I think we need to escape a back checker to try to challenge the checker on
our 7 point. The opponent will admittedly have a few pointing numbers but is still an underdog to do so as this would require a roll with no 5 or 6.
So 24/18. If we go all the way to 15, we diversify for the opponent.
Their small rolls will point on us and their large rolls will move past us.
So definitely stop at 18. But how about the 3?
We don't want to make the ace point so don't slot it. 8/5 seems to preserve the forward structure as much as we can.
24/18 8/5 is my play. Now I'll look at what the wiser man says.
Hmmm, he sees it differently and seems to see my play as an unusual QF play.
I thought my play was the normal way.
Autres temps, autres moeurs as Stick would say if he was still studying French.
Paul
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)