On 6/11/2023 8:57 AM, Timothy Chow wrote:
XGID=-Aaa-CCA----aE-a-abd-bb-B-:0:0:1:33:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O O | | O O O X |
| X O | | O O O X |
| X | | O |
| X | | O |
| X | | |
| |BAR| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | X X |
| | | X X |
| O X | | X X O O X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 154 O: 128 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 33
I'll go with the (often incorrect) aphorism to "attack a single checker,
prime two" and simply make the bar and 10 points.
Instead of making the four point. Yes, this goes against what I just
wrote in another thread since O is off the ace point, but the bar point
is still doing a decent job of blocking and the midpoint is crying to be unstacked.
Is making the ace point while whacking two better? I don't think so
without any builders in sight, but won't be surprised if it's the bot move.
Tim, have you done a series on bar vs 4 point? BKS brought it up, and
it's worth a look if you have examples.
--
Ah....Clem
The future is fun, the future is fair.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)