On 2022-11-23, Timothy Chow <
[email protected]> wrote:
XGID=-a-aB-E-B--AdC---c-e-a--AA:0:0:1:61:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O | | O O X |
| X O | | O |
| X O | | O |
| | | O |
| | X | O |
| |BAR| |
| | | X |
| O | | X |
| O | | X |
| O X | | X X |
| O X X | | X X O O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 153 O: 156 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 61
Here I'm pretty sure that it would be better not to play the 6 at all.
In fact it wouldn't.
GNUbg's evaluations of the position:
1. Cubeful 4-ply bar/24 11/5 Eq.: +0.160
0.529 0.192 0.010 - 0.471 0.132 0.008
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
2. Cubeful 4-ply bar/18 Eq.: +0.088 (-0.073)
0.526 0.163 0.009 - 0.474 0.150 0.007
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
Very close to XG's rollout, evaluations of this kind of early game
positions seem accurate.
Looking at a 2-1 from the obvious variant that would give the same
result as not playing the 6 in the original position:
1. Cubeful 4-ply bar/24 13/11 Eq.: +0.067
0.512 0.176 0.008 - 0.488 0.145 0.009
4-ply cubeful prune [4ply]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)