On 9/15/2022 4:18 PM,
[email protected] wrote:
This is a question of terminology.
Suppose we are trying to bear in safely, and we are deciding whether
to offer a 17/1 shot in the hope of a safer bearoff on subsequent rolls,
or whether to risk absolutely nothing but have a slightly less smooth position.
Is this problem type also "Pay now, Pay later" or is it part of the definition
of a "Pay now Pay later" problem that the number of shots conceded
by the pay now candidate is very large (approx 30% or more)?
I've usually seen it applied when you're volunteering a direct shot.
But I don't think anyone would complain if you used it for the case
of a 17/1 shot. I think I've probably used it myself for that case
sometimes.
---
Tim Chow
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)