On 8/26/2021 10:16 AM,
[email protected] wrote:
My play of 6/3 6/2 didn't seem so horrific to me.
I was only trying to cover my blot.
Why is the play criminal?
Grateful for any explanations.
Thanks,
Paul
XGID=--ABb-D-E----Ca-a-adabba--:0:0:1:43:0:0:3:0:X:Daniel O:eXtremeGammon 10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game, Jacoby Beaver
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| X O O O | | O O O O O |
| X | | O O O |
| X | | O |
| | | O |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| X | | |
| X | | X |
| X | | X |
| X | | X O X |
| X | | X O X X |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 111 O: 114 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 1
X to play 43
As Stick said, you're just trying to bring your checkers home
without offering unnecessary shots, so covering your blot is
not a priority. But as for why XG says 6/3 6/2 is a triple
whopper rather than just a run-of-the-mill blunder, the problem
is that it eliminates valuable spares. How are you going to
play 3's and 4's, especially 63 53 31 54? By playing 13/6, you
create a useful spare instead of burning two of them.
---
Tim Chow
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)