On 9/14/2023 8:52 AM, Timothy Chow wrote:
The subject line is a joke that my playing group enjoys.
Many people claim that a 1-5 backgame structure is the weakest, but the
0-1 structure seems to be worse.
XGID=bcBCBCCB---------bccb-----:1:-1:1:44:0:0:0:0:10
Score is X:0 O:0. Unlimited Game
+13-14-15-16-17-18------19-20-21-22-23-24-+
| O O | | O O | +---+
| O O | | O O | | 2 |
| O | | O | +---+
| | | |
| | | |
| |BAR| |
| | O | |
| | O | |
| | | X X X O |
| X | | X X X X X O |
| X | | X X X X X O |
+12-11-10--9--8--7-------6--5--4--3--2--1-+
Pip count X: 68 O: 187 X-O: 0-0
Cube: 2, O own cube
X to play 44
If the race were closer and O stood more of a chance of running off the
gammon I'd look seriously at taking two off now. But I don't think it's
worth risking leaving a gap for a marginal increase (assuming it
actually is an increase) in gammons.
So, I'll clear the 6 and play 7/3. It exposes no shots and leaves X even
ended. 7/3 6/2(3)
--
Ah....Clem
The future is fun, the future is fair.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)