Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Winning Numbers
02 07 21 31 45

1.Jerome: 44
2.Constant: 41 Random 41
3.Nan: 38
4.Alphazero: 33
5.Jinks: 31
6.NN: 0


NN
19, 11, 40, 50, 33, 38, 22, 9, 30, 25, 12, 23, 4, 14, 43, 17, 5, 26, 8, 37
=0

Constant
42 40 21* 36 38 26 39 29 31* 45* 05 08 30 32 35 06 09 10 16 41
=18+12+11=41
Random
02*, 06 , 9, 10 , 12, 22, 23, 31*, 32, 39, 3, 20, 21*, 29 , 30, 50, 49,1,13,19 =20+13+8=41
Alphazero
19 39 26 22 12 31* 21* 43 06 10 20 40 43 30 23 36 02* 09 29 32
=15+14+4=33
Nan
43 19 26 22 29 12 21* 31* 03 02* 20 23 36 09 39 49 13 01 06 10
=14+13+11=38
Jinks:
39 22 31* 23 43 18 12 21* 10 26 24 19 06 42 48 30 40 08 20 25
=18+13=31

Jerome
49 5 13 29 43 1 3 21* 31* 02* 08 23 07* 17 37 41 47 11 19 34
=13+12+11+8=44

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

王乾懿 Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

??? Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.

Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.

It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)

Jez

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.

I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.

Jerome

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

在 2022年4月9日星期六 UTC+8 01:14:03，<Jerome Fandor> 写道：

"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.

I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.

Jerome

You are welcome :-)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Jerome Fandor wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

??? Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.

Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.

It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)

Jez

Not so much high jinks at the moment ;-)

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions
are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers
for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Jerome Fandor wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

??? Wang Qianyi (Nan) wrote:

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Congratulations Jerome.

Evil Nigel

Cheers Nigel.

It was good to get one over on that pesky Jinks ;-)

Jez

Not so much high jinks at the moment ;-)

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers for a
competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

I'm just not a fan of the Euro Mill. For many years I did the works
syndicate for it and we just didn't get the returns. The prize tiers are
not fair. If you get 3 numbers then we know that this 3 doubles. But the prize you get is not the same as 3 x 2 doubles or 3 x 2 doubles with a
premium. I think I wrote to them to complain.

I still do the works syndicate (even though I have retired) but we now do
the Lotto. Same issue but the pain is less ;-)

For a time, but in shadow mode, I did the Euro Hot Picks with choosing 2
from 12. The prize for getting 2 right is a �100. The cost is �99. Me predictions for that were poor.

MJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

betting with Fibonacci series is so far the best option.

Jerome won with a 3 in 11 in round 7, winning 11332.5 euro
Nan won with a 3 in 11 in round 7, winning 11332.5 euro
Constant won with a 3 in 11 in round 3, winning 2767.5 euro
Alphazero won in just round 1, winning 1252.5 euro.

:-)
Nan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

nigel wrote:

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions
are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers
for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is
twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

在 2022年4月11日星期一 UTC+8 17:38:40，<nigel> 写道：

nigel wrote:

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set of numbers for a competition like this is problematic unless repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!

Evil Nigel

I also use the technique of position selection, however the accuracy weighting is insufficient. As a result, I normally change the weights by looking for the same numbers in both the position and probability prediction numbers.
Nan

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

nigel wrote:

nigel wrote:

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the
positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced set
of numbers for a competition like this is problematic unless
repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish is twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should be either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't working!

Evil Nigel

Last night, the 9th, 25th and 42nd numvers were drawn. Quite a decent
result IMO (three from tenish), but still not quite what I wrote on the
tin ;-)

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

Evil Nigel




nigel wrote:

nigel wrote:

nigel wrote:

I'm experimenting with a new system. One of its phases involves
positional limits. That's awkward for Euromillions because the
positions are 8/9, 17, 25/26, 34, 42/43. Coming up with a balanced
set of numbers for a competition like this is problematic unless
repetition is allowed
eg 8,9,17,17,25,26,34,34,42,43 is ten numbers.

Oh well, there's always next year's WLC, if any of us are still around.

Evil Nigel

On Friday, my system's 25th and 26th numbers were drawn. 2 from 10ish
is twice expectation. But with positional limits, 25th and 26th should
be either/or, not both. So a decent result suggests the system isn't
working!

Evil Nigel

Last night, the 9th, 25th and 42nd numvers were drawn. Quite a decent
result IMO (three from tenish), but still not quite what I wrote on the
tin ;-)

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will be
at least
one number divisible by 3.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last night)
and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

Just sayin'

MJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will be at least
one number divisible by 3.

They were actually divsible by 6!

All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last night) and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1 number wholly divisible by 5.

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

Just sayin'

MJ

Evil Nigel

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will
be at least
one number divisible by 3.

They were actually divsible by 6!

All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last
night) and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1
number wholly divisible by 5.

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact
multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

Just sayin'

MJ

Evil Nigel

6 is two 3s of course ;-)

I don't know the answer to your question.

Initially I was drawn to tracking wholly divisible by 5 and would always
make sure my line entries for the work's syndicate had this. Then started looking at divisible wholly by 3. It's quite low hanging fruit really but
86% was such a compelling factor that I now track this instead,; although we
do the Lotto instead (which has the same characteristic).

MJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

42,07,06,06,15,26,41,41,39,46

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

0/10.

Jinksed again ;-)

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, 8 April 2022 at 18:14:03 UTC+1, Jerome Fandor wrote:

"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Jerome is the winner! Congrats!

RESULTS after Round 7 (Final Score of 2022 EURO MILLION WLC)
1.Jerome 31+28+38+45+17+29+44=232
2.Alphazero 37+48+16+25+25+21+33=205
3.Nan 23+27+30+30+19+20+38=187
4.Random 18+32+25+15+43+0+41=174J
5.Jinks 15+34+16+17+30+26+31=169
6.Constant 0+15+4+50+21+29+41=160
7. NN 18+0+26+0+19+44+0=107

Thanks for hosting this compie Nan.

I'm not a huge fan of the Euro Mill but it was good to take part.

Jerome

Congratulations from me too.

( having internet issues which meant I was offline for a few weeks :-( )

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

I've been doing some messing around. I'm not sure my calculations are
correct but my findings are below.

Evil Nigel

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>news:[email protected]...

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will >>>be at least
one number divisible by 3.

I make that 87%.

They were actually divsible by 6!

All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last >>>night) and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1 >>>number wholly divisible by 5.

I make that 69%

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact >>multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

My answer is 8, when it drops to 49%.

Note that some number sequences with gaps of 8 eg 1,9,17,25,33,41,49
will have a 55% chance of at least one number being drawn.

Just sayin'

MJ

Evil Nigel

6 is two 3s of course ;-)

I don't know the answer to your question.

Initially I was drawn to tracking wholly divisible by 5 and would always
make sure my line entries for the work's syndicate had this. Then started looking at divisible wholly by 3. It's quite low hanging fruit really but 86% was such a compelling factor that I now track this instead,; although we do the Lotto instead (which has the same characteristic).

MJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

43,39,35,35,47,20,04,04,40,48

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

42,07,06***,06***,15,26,41,41,39,46

Not really 2/10, more like 1/5.

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

0/10.

Jinksed again ;-)

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...

I've been doing some messing around. I'm not sure my calculations are
correct but my findings are below.

Evil Nigel

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

Marmaduke Jinks wrote:

"nigel" <[email protected]> wrote in message >>>>news:[email protected]...

30,33,26,26,13,37,40,40,22,34

Evil Nigel

nigel wrote:

A watched lottery system never wins ;-)

21,41,35,35,10,04,13,13,23,37

0/10 :-(

Evil Nigel

4 of the numbers were wholly divisible by 3. 86% of the time there will >>>>be at least
one number divisible by 3.

I make that 87%.

They were actually divsible by 6!

All the numbers were even and three were divisible by 8.

35% 1 number, 33% 2 numbers, 15% 3 numbers, 3% 4 numbers (like last >>>>night) and 14% 0 numbers.

Makes for an interesting selection of numbers.

A little less in the stats but 70% of the time there will be at least 1 >>>>number wholly divisible by 5.

I make that 69%

At what point does the likelihood of a given divisor being an exact >>>multiple of any of the drawn numbers drop below 50%?

My answer is 8, when it drops to 49%.

Note that some number sequences with gaps of 8 eg 1,9,17,25,33,41,49 will have a 55% chance of at least one number being drawn.

That's interesting. Not sure how I can use that. I've been putting numbers into 3 channels - Prime and Fibonacci, then 3s and then the rest. Then choosing 2 (excel randomly) from each channel.

I bet Leonardo da Vinci never had this much fun with a spreadsheet ;-)

MJ

MJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)