Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
Jerome
34 7 55 17 1 2 3 29* 53 59* 23 47 37 21 31 5 8 41 11 43 13 40 44
19
=17
Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
MJ
39 53 13 46 12 41 5 50* 36 31 26 3 35 20 59* 14 58 47 57 25 56 37 1 4
=10
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...MJ
Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
MJ~~
39 53 13 46 12 41 5 50* 36 31 26 3 35 20 59* 14 58 47 57 25 56 37 1 4
=10
Nan
I think you'll find that Jink's 50 and 59 scored 17 and 10 = 27.
MJ
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...MJ
Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
MJ~~
39 53 13 46 12 41 5 50* 36 31 26 3 35 20 59* 14 58 47 57 25 56 37 1 4
=10
Nan
I think you'll find that Jink's 50 and 59 scored 17 and 10 = 27.
MJ
SteveOk...I gotta be more careful.
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
? 2022?2?3???? UTC+8 08:49:40,<Marmaduke Jinks> ??:
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
MJ~~
39 53 13 46 12 41 5 50* 36 31 26 3 35 20 59* 14 58 47 57 25 56 37 1 4 =10
Nan
I think you'll find that Jink's 50 and 59 scored 17 and 10 = 27.
MJMJ
I am really bad counting numbers with my eyes.
Would you replace me for holding 11-20 rounds for the calculation work if your time is ok?
I started round 11 already!
Nan
~~~~
Nan
You're doing a terrific job. I think you should carry on doing the scoring.
I was only looking at the posts, at that time, because I have a phase of dreadful insomnia and it beats lying in bed looking into the darkness.
MJ
SteveOk...I gotta be more careful.
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
? 2022?2?3???? UTC+8 08:49:40,<Marmaduke Jinks> ??:
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
Winning Numbers
06 22 29 48 50 59 + 03
Results of Round 10
1.Nigel 32
2.Constant 24
3.Jerome 17
4.MJ 10
5.Nan 0 Leela 0 Alphazero 0 Random 0 NN 0
MJ~~
39 53 13 46 12 41 5 50* 36 31 26 3 35 20 59* 14 58 47 57 25 56 37 1 4
=10
Nan
I think you'll find that Jink's 50 and 59 scored 17 and 10 = 27.
MJMJ
I am really bad counting numbers with my eyes.
Would you replace me for holding 11-20 rounds for the calculation work if your time is ok?
I started round 11 already!
Nan
~~~~
Nan
You're doing a terrific job. I think you should carry on doing the
scoring.
I was only looking at the posts, at that time, because I have a phase of dreadful insomnia and it beats lying in bed looking into the darkness.
MJ
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...You're right, I was making excuses for myself, because I never failed so poorly, regardless of whether the AI or my self-selected scores were 0. I was quite disappointed this time because I had made a significant change to my algorithm in the previous
The most powerful number in the world is 0. Because only when 0 is the denominator, it has the right to make everything become one with itself. As long as there are other numbers present, there is change. There is change and there are distractions. Distractions can give rise to the search for why there are other distractions besides the number 0 for change to existing. Therefore, the nature of the world is empty and nothingness. The universe evolves from nothing and eventually becomes emptiness. Void is a collection of no time and space.
Nan
~~~
The concept of 0 in mathematics is quite recent though I think. Last 2000 years?
MJ
ps - you had to rub it in over those zero scores eh? ;-)
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...You're right, I was making excuses for myself, because I never failed so poorly, regardless of whether the AI or my self-selected scores were 0. I
The most powerful number in the world is 0. Because only when 0 is the denominator, it has the right to make everything become one with itself.
As
long as there are other numbers present, there is change. There is change
and there are distractions. Distractions can give rise to the search for
why
there are other distractions besides the number 0 for change to existing. Therefore, the nature of the world is empty and nothingness. The universe evolves from nothing and eventually becomes emptiness. Void is a
collection
of no time and space.
Nan
~~~
The concept of 0 in mathematics is quite recent though I think. Last 2000 years?
MJ
ps - you had to rub it in over those zero scores eh? ;-)
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...http://www.lottoprediction.com/lotteries/europe/uk/thunderball/
? 2022?2?4???? UTC+8 00:36:07,<Marmaduke Jinks> ??:
"??? Wang Qianyi (Nan)" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]...
The most powerful number in the world is 0. Because only when 0 is the denominator, it has the right to make everything become one with itself. As
long as there are other numbers present, there is change. There is change and there are distractions. Distractions can give rise to the search for why
there are other distractions besides the number 0 for change to existing. Therefore, the nature of the world is empty and nothingness. The universe evolves from nothing and eventually becomes emptiness. Void is a collection
of no time and space.
Nan
~~~
The concept of 0 in mathematics is quite recent though I think. Last 2000 years?
MJ
ps - you had to rub it in over those zero scores eh? ;-)You're right, I was making excuses for myself, because I never failed so poorly, regardless of whether the AI or my self-selected scores were 0. I was quite disappointed this time because I had made a significant change to my algorithm in the previous round, and I was expecting a better turnaround or a higher score, but I didn't get it. As you can see, I only lightly posted a few pieces of data in round 11, which didn't go through my fine tweaking, so perhaps I should re-predict, but that's for tomorrow.
If we apply this 64 trigram to the lottery, in fact, every number corresponds to a trigram, and between the trigram and the trigram transformation, I don't know what force or what reason is responsible for the change of the numbers, but one thing is certain, there must be some pattern to their transformation. There is some form of chaotic law hidden behind the utter unpredictability. If we can easily break the law of chaos, either by using a time machine to accomplish FTL or by using human thinking to forecast, it will cost more energy than we can conceive.
Nan
~~~
Re not doing so well. I wouldn't worry about that. The challenge is not a sprint it's more of a marathon. And it's not over yet! The only time you don't want a nil round is (where I was a few years ago) being in the lead going into round 20 by a few points and getting null points.
Re your 64 Trigram. The Nick Koutras spreadsheet has the LEX ID column
which gives a unique value to the numbers drawn. I'm not sure it helps to know all the outcomes, which is what Game Theory would have you do. I prefer the world of Turbulence.
MJ
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 165:47:02 |
| Calls: | 12,096 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,001 |
| Messages: | 6,517,807 |