1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. REC.GAMBLING.POKER

  • Ukraine has NO chance

    From Paul Popinjay@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 22 11:50:58 2023
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BTSinAustin@21:1/5 to Paul Popinjay on Tue Aug 22 12:22:13 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.

    I'm sure Joe can come up with another 100 bil or so. Maybe the people in Maui can donate

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Paul Popinjay on Tue Aug 22 16:32:08 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 11:51:03 AM UTC-7, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    .

    Then you should have no trouble verifying those numbers.
    (** That's like "Then you should have no trouble showing us." ***)

    So "Spit it out, asshole."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to Paul Popinjay on Tue Aug 22 21:03:31 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 11:51:03 AM UTC-7, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.

    Ukraine is only just now building a new cemetary 5x the size of Arlington. Imagine how my dead soldiers that'll hold.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Norfolk@21:1/5 to Paul Popinjay on Wed Aug 23 21:13:03 2023
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.

    Where are you getting your figures?

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/ukraine-russia-war-casualties.html, quoting the Pentagon:

    Russia’s military casualties, the officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to 70,000
    killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to Tim Norfolk on Wed Aug 23 21:17:15 2023
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 9:13:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    Where are you getting your figures?

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/ukraine-russia-war-casualties.html, quoting the Pentagon:

    Russia’s military casualties, the officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to 70,
    000 killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded.

    You're a dumbass, Tim. Pentagon is just regurgitating the bullshit claims of Ukraine about Russian casualties. Even if you literally don't know exact figures, you can easily deduce that Ukraine is suffering many times more casualties than Russia
    because Ukraine is doing all the attacking against massive fortifications, Ukraine has 1/10th the artillery(which does nearly all the killing as anyone in the military can tell you), and Russia has all the air power. You'd have to be stupid to think
    casualties are anywhere similar.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Tim Norfolk on Thu Aug 24 09:39:32 2023
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 9:13:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    Where are you getting your figures?
    .

    Popinjay999 gets his figures from his cock (his rooster that's roosting in a peach orchard in Dinuba).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tim Norfolk@21:1/5 to jack roth on Thu Aug 24 14:05:50 2023
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 12:17:19 AM UTC-4, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 9:13:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    Where are you getting your figures?

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/ukraine-russia-war-casualties.html, quoting the Pentagon:

    Russia’s military casualties, the officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to 70,
    000 killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded.
    You're a dumbass, Tim. Pentagon is just regurgitating the bullshit claims of Ukraine about Russian casualties. Even if you literally don't know exact figures, you can easily deduce that Ukraine is suffering many times more casualties than Russia
    because Ukraine is doing all the attacking against massive fortifications, Ukraine has 1/10th the artillery(which does nearly all the killing as anyone in the military can tell you), and Russia has all the air power. You'd have to be stupid to think
    casualties are anywhere similar.

    Have you not seen the figures on air combat casualties, then? Russia is back to using 80's-era vehicles and aircraft, and has stripped anti-aircraft missles from most cities to use against Ukrainian cities.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to Tim Norfolk on Thu Aug 24 15:54:45 2023
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 2:05:55 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 12:17:19 AM UTC-4, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 9:13:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    Where are you getting your figures?

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/ukraine-russia-war-casualties.html, quoting the Pentagon:

    Russia’s military casualties, the officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to
    70,000 killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded.
    You're a dumbass, Tim. Pentagon is just regurgitating the bullshit claims of Ukraine about Russian casualties. Even if you literally don't know exact figures, you can easily deduce that Ukraine is suffering many times more casualties than Russia
    because Ukraine is doing all the attacking against massive fortifications, Ukraine has 1/10th the artillery(which does nearly all the killing as anyone in the military can tell you), and Russia has all the air power. You'd have to be stupid to think
    casualties are anywhere similar.
    Have you not seen the figures on air combat casualties, then? Russia is back to using 80's-era vehicles and aircraft, and has stripped anti-aircraft missles from most cities to use against Ukrainian cities.

    You are absolutely clueless. The casualties figures coming out of Ukraine's side is pure fiction. They are just trying to gin shit up in order to make it not look as bad as reality is for them. Even the US Govt is admitting now what a complete
    failure ukraine is at this point. And, Russia started out using it's worst equipment...why not? They trained in used vehicles, trucks anything with a Z on it to use it up and test out and use up the tech the West had waiting for them. But, now they
    are starting to bring out the better stuff they've held back...and of course, they are ramping up production to levels the west can only dream. Russians have thoroughly defeated not only Ukraine, but also all of Nato...and the Rest of the World can
    plainly see that now and is suddenly becoming fearless in rejecting the threats coming out of the USA. China is fully on board with Russia and Africa is completely on board with both China and Russia. This has been an utterly complete failure of the
    Biden administration which basically has destroyed the United Stated internationally at this point. And, you'd have to be the most tone deaf person around not to plainly see that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Fri Aug 25 07:22:08 2023
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 3:54:49 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 2:05:55 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Thursday, August 24, 2023 at 12:17:19 AM UTC-4, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, August 23, 2023 at 9:13:07 PM UTC-7, Tim Norfolk wrote:
    On Tuesday, August 22, 2023 at 2:51:03 PM UTC-4, Paul Popinjay wrote:
    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.
    Where are you getting your figures?

    From https://www.nytimes.com/2023/08/18/us/politics/ukraine-russia-war-casualties.html, quoting the Pentagon:

    Russia’s military casualties, the officials said, are approaching 300,000. The number includes as many as 120,000 deaths and 170,000 to 180,000 injured troops. The Russian numbers dwarf the Ukrainian figures, which the officials put at close to
    70,000 killed and 100,000 to 120,000 wounded.
    You're a dumbass, Tim. Pentagon is just regurgitating the bullshit claims of Ukraine about Russian casualties. Even if you literally don't know exact figures, you can easily deduce that Ukraine is suffering many times more casualties than Russia
    because Ukraine is doing all the attacking against massive fortifications, Ukraine has 1/10th the artillery(which does nearly all the killing as anyone in the military can tell you), and Russia has all the air power. You'd have to be stupid to think
    casualties are anywhere similar.
    Have you not seen the figures on air combat casualties, then? Russia is back to using 80's-era vehicles and aircraft, and has stripped anti-aircraft missles from most cities to use against Ukrainian cities.
    .

    You are absolutely clueless. The casualties figures coming out of Ukraine's side is pure fiction....

    (Bullshit deleted).

    Jesus, Tim. Haven't you learned this bloviating idiot is like Trump and the other indited, GOP idiots? ("Italia space satellites switched votes!") They just make up, that which they know nothing about, then call it undisputed fact. And this Jack Off
    continues the tradition.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mossingen@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 27 21:14:17 2023
    "Paul Popinjay" wrote in message news:[email protected]...

    Like I said on RGP months ago, and many here disagreed with me, Ukraine has
    no chance. Russia has lost 50,000 troops, Ukraine has lost 400,000.


    _____________


    Yep. Russia is determined, Putin doesn't care what it takes, and Russia has the resources to get it done. The U.S. can prop up Ukraine for a bit, but they're toast.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)