• Re: Trump gets the last laugh

    From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 16 12:37:21 2023
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!

    Compare:
    o GUILTY Stewart Rhodes, Sedition
    o GUILTY Jesse Benton, Illegal Russian campaign contribution
    o GUILTY Steve Bannon, Contempt of Congress
    o GUILTY Lev Parnas, Funneled money from Russia to Trump's GOP
    o GUILTY George Papadopoulus, Trump foreign policy adviser
    o GUILTY Paul Manafort, Chair of Trump's campaign
    o GUILTY Rick Gates, Trump campaign aide
    o GUILTY Michael Flynn, Trump national security adviser
    o GUILTY Richard Pinedo, Russian cutout
    o GUILTY Alex van der Zwaan, Gates liaison with Ukraine
    o GUILTY Michael Cohen, Trump's personal lawyer
    o GUILTY W. Samuel Patten, Laundered Russian Money for Trump
    o GUILTY Marina Butina, Conspired with NRA/GOP for Russian Intelligence
    o GUILTY George Nader, Russia/MidEast liason, Child Porn
    o GUILTY Roger J. Stone, Jr., Longtime Trump adviser
    o GUILTY Chris Collins, First in Congress endorse Trump, insider trading
    o GUILTY Elliot Broidy, Trump Campaign fundraiser
    o GUILTY Stephen Calk, CEO Federal Saving Bank of Chicago
    o GUILTY Igor Fruman, Guiliani associate, Trump trickster
    o GUILTY Allen Weisselberg Tax Fraud, Trump's CFO
    o INDICTED 13 Russian nationals, 3 Russian companies
    o INDICTED Konstantin Kilimnik, Russian associate of Manafort
    o INDICTED 12 Russian GRU officers
    o INDICTED Peter Navarro, criminal contempt of congress
    o IMPEACHED Donald J. Trump
    o IMPEACHED Donald J. Trump

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to All on Tue May 16 05:30:07 2023
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

    You may remember another special counsel, Robert Mueller,
    who found out after spending tens of millions of dollars that
    the Trump campaign had nothing to do with plots from Russia
    and that the entire thing was engineered by the
    Hillary Clinton campaign.

    The FBI, of course, knew that early on, but the bureau chose to
    probe the matter anyway to make Donald Trump look bad and
    possibly tilt the election to Hillary.

    Durham does not name names because he's part of the
    Washington establishment, but the culprits are former FBI
    Director James Comey, former Assistant Director Andrew McCabe,
    and the notorious Peter Strzok, who orchestrated the fraudulent investigation. All three were banished from the FBI but
    will not be prosecuted in a court of law.

    Why not? Because Attorney General Merrick Garland is a Democrat
    who takes orders from another Democrat named Joe Biden.

    Ladies and Gentlemen, welcome to the DC swamp, where
    powerful government agencies are now actively interfering in
    presidential campaigns. How bout those 51 former national
    security people who signed a letter saying Hunter Biden's
    laptop was a Russian plant? It's one big happy political hack family.

    In fact, I think all the Russian Collusion-Hunter Biden guys and gals
    should have a reunion down the road; they could lift a glass and toast
    the fact that they almost did it. They were this close to ushering Hillary
    into power and actually helped Biden win.

    It's all about ideology and subterfuge. This is America today."
    Bill O'Reilly

    Every loss for the left-wing Democrats is a win for America!

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Tue May 16 06:25:09 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 8:37:28 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!

    The extensive investigation totally cleared Trump, proved the
    entire phoney, false and fabricated Russian hoax was funded by Hillary Clinton and the Democrats and that crooked FBI leaders helped them do it.

    This whole dishonest Clinton/Democrat collusion is a huge embarassment
    for the Democrats and seriously damages their credibility. It will also rally Republican and Independent voters to turn out for Republicans in 2024.
    And it could not come at a worse time for Biden now that he and
    his entire family have been caught taking $millions in
    kick-backs and bribes from China, Russia and other foreign governments.

    Trump absolutely gets the last laugh!

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 16 13:30:06 2023
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 8:37:28 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!

    The extensive investigation totally cleared Trump, proved the
    entire phoney, false and fabricated Russian hoax was funded by Hillary Clinton >and the Democrats and that crooked FBI leaders helped them do it.
    ...

    It did no such thing. It showed that the Barr/Trump appointment
    of Durham, and the subsequent 4-year investigation was a complete
    sham. Zero indictments.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Tue May 16 07:51:28 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 9:30:14 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 8:37:28 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!

    The extensive investigation totally cleared Trump, proved the
    entire phoney, false and fabricated Russian hoax was funded by Hillary Clinton
    and the Democrats and that crooked FBI leaders helped them do it.
    ...

    It did no such thing. It showed that the Barr/Trump appointment
    of Durham, and the subsequent 4-year investigation was a complete
    sham. Zero indictments.

    --bks

    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.

    And for years they have been falsely claiming Trump colluded
    with Russia. Well now Trump has been found innocent
    and it's been proven it was all a pack of lies by Hillary
    Clinton and the Democrats.

    Do you seriously believe this is not going to help Republicans
    and hurt Democrats in 2024? Because if you do I can get
    you a great deal on some prime ocean front property
    in Kansas!

    Trump absolutely got the last laugh!

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 16 15:17:12 2023
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.
    ...

    No they haven't. That stupid story crashed and burned when
    Kentucky GOP nutcase James Comer's "informant" went missing.
    Even Fox News couldn't stomach that that nonsense.

    Meanwhile, in the real world of real corruption:
    |
    | Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172
    | million and $640 million in outside income while working in
    | the White House, according to an analysis of financial
    | disclosures by CREW
    | ... <https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/>

    And
    |
    | A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani
    | says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and
    | then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell
    | presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to
    | court documents.
    | ...
    <https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-said-trump-were-224039141.html>

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Tue May 16 11:26:09 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:17:20 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.
    ...

    No they haven't. That stupid story crashed and burned when
    Kentucky GOP nutcase James Comer's "informant" went missing.
    Even Fox News couldn't stomach that that nonsense.

    Meanwhile, in the real world of real corruption:
    |
    | Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172
    | million and $640 million in outside income while working in
    | the White House, according to an analysis of financial
    | disclosures by CREW
    | ... <https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/>

    And
    |
    | A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani
    | says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and
    | then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell
    | presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to
    | court documents.
    | ...
    <https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-said-trump-were-224039141.html>

    --bks

    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Tue May 16 12:44:55 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:26:12 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:17:20 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.
    ...

    No they haven't. That stupid story crashed and burned when
    Kentucky GOP nutcase James Comer's "informant" went missing.
    Even Fox News couldn't stomach that that nonsense.

    Meanwhile, in the real world of real corruption:
    |
    | Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172
    | million and $640 million in outside income while working in
    | the White House, according to an analysis of financial
    | disclosures by CREW
    | ... <https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/>

    And
    |
    | A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani
    | says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and
    | then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell
    | presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to
    | court documents.
    | ... <https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-said-trump-were-224039141.html>

    --bks

    ~ Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.

    Irish Mike


    Try drug rehab, Mike. Surely even you can see by now that your life took a wrong turn.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue May 16 19:41:31 2023
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.

    Apology accepted.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Tue May 16 14:00:01 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 5:30:11 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    .

    LOL! Wrong from the start, Stupid Asshole. After losing the two cases he took to court, he admitted
    he had NOTHING but some suggested FBI procedural changes.
    .

    You may remember another special counsel, Robert Mueller,
    who found out after spending tens of millions of dollars that
    the Trump campaign had nothing to do with plots from Russia
    and that the entire thing was engineered by the
    Hillary Clinton campaign.
    .

    LOL again! Wrong again, Stupid Asshole. This has ALREADY been proven wrong.
    ,
    ,
    ,
    The FBI, of course, knew that early on
    .
    Then you should have no problem showing us.

    **** AND WE KNOW YOU CAN'T ****
    .
    .
    .
    , but the bureau chose to probe the matter anyway to make Donald Trump look bad and
    possibly tilt the election to Hillary.
    .

    AGAIN, wrong. AGAIN SHOW US.

    See how fucking ignorant you are?


    So tell us who you Cut & Paste this lying bullshit from so we can keep pointing out your ignorance.
    .
    .
    .

    Durham does not name names because

    HE'S wrong and you can't. LOL
    .
    .
    Director James Comey, former Assistant Director Andrew McCabe, and the notorious Peter Strzok,
    who orchestrated the fraudulent investigation.

    AGAIN --- WRONG. **** SHOW US ***
    .

    Heh. You poor ignorant fuck. Come on, tell us who you Cut & Paste this lying bullshit from so we can
    keep pointing out your ignorance. We KNOW FOX couldn't peddle this shit. Who is it?

    QAnon? FOX? Breitbart News? OANN? Facebook? Twitter? Newsmax?
    Come on, you little coward. WHO? Who do you Cut & Paste from?
    .
    .
    .
    All three were banished from the FBI
    .

    AGAIN --- WRONG. They were NOT.

    *** AND YOU CAN’T SHOW THAT THEY WERE ****
    .
    .
    .
    but will not be prosecuted in a court of law.
    .
    WHY NOT?

    (I just LOVE bitch slapping this little ignorant fool).
    .
    .

    Why not? Because Attorney General Merrick Garland is a Democrat
    who takes orders from another Democrat named Joe Biden.
    .
    AGAIN --- WRONG. **** YOU CAN’T SHOW THAT HE DOES ****
    .

    ******* FOUND IT! *****
    .

    You’re still sucking Bill O’Reilly’s dick and puking up his come on us. ***********************************************************

    https://www.billoreilly.com/b/The-Durham-Report/559691506076861689.html

    **************************************************************

    There it is! This disgraces, woman-assaulting, Fox-Fired, lying asshole is the one feeding you shit to eat.
    And you eat it!!

    .
    .

    In fact, I think all the Russian Collusion-Hunter Biden guys and gals
    should have a reunion down the road; they could lift a glass and toast
    the fact that they almost did it. They were this close to ushering Hillary into power and actually helped Biden win.

    It's all about ideology and subterfuge. This is America today."
    Bill O'Reilly
    .

    See?
    .

    Every loss for the left-wing Democrats is a win for losing your Social Security and Healthcare!

    Lying Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Tue May 16 14:06:22 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 6:25:12 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 8:37:28 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!
    .

    The extensive investigation totally cleared Trump, proved the
    entire phoney, false and fabricated Russian hoax was funded by Hillary Clinton
    and the Democrats and that crooked FBI leaders helped them do it.
    .

    Then show us. SHOW US, you stupid ignorant fuck.

    It's Fox shit-eating fools like you that have us veterans losing benefits, our Social Security
    and our Medicare.

    It's stupid motherfuckers like you that need to be taken out becaue you HARM
    us veterans. You cowardly little draft-dodging, fucking flake...

    .....

    Lying, AWOL, Draft-dodging cowardly Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Tue May 16 14:10:10 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 7:51:32 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 9:30:14 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 8:37:28 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote: >> Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.
    ...

    Bullshit. Twice as long as the Mueller investigation!
    Zero convictions. In fact, *zero indictments*!

    The extensive investigation totally cleared Trump, proved the
    entire phoney, false and fabricated Russian hoax was funded by Hillary Clinton
    and the Democrats and that crooked FBI leaders helped them do it.
    ...

    It did no such thing. It showed that the Barr/Trump appointment
    of Durham, and the subsequent 4-year investigation was a complete
    sham. Zero indictments.

    --bks
    .

    At this time only 36% of Americans approve...
    .

    See there, Bradly? This little weasel coward can't answer because he's too stupid.
    He's right wing bate, used to fuck us veterans and our families.
    .
    .
    .

    Chicken shit coward, Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Tue May 16 14:15:10 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:26:12 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:17:20 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.
    ...

    No they haven't. That stupid story crashed and burned when
    Kentucky GOP nutcase James Comer's "informant" went missing.
    Even Fox News couldn't stomach that that nonsense.

    Meanwhile, in the real world of real corruption:
    |
    | Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172
    | million and $640 million in outside income while working in
    | the White House, according to an analysis of financial
    | disclosures by CREW
    | ... <https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/>

    And
    |
    | A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani
    | says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and
    | then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell
    | presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to
    | court documents.
    | ... <https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-said-trump-were-224039141.html>

    --bks
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    .

    **** You don't converse, you ignorant fuck! ****

    You can't. I've proved you too stupid...

    Veteran hating draft dodging Irish Mick...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to risky biz on Tue May 16 14:20:53 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:44:58 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:26:12 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 11:17:20 AM UTC-4, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    At this time only 36% of Americans approve of Biden's job
    performance. And now he and his family have been caught
    taking bribes and kickbacks from foreign governments.
    ...

    No they haven't. That stupid story crashed and burned when
    Kentucky GOP nutcase James Comer's "informant" went missing.
    Even Fox News couldn't stomach that that nonsense.

    Meanwhile, in the real world of real corruption:
    |
    | Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump reported between $172
    | million and $640 million in outside income while working in
    | the White House, according to an analysis of financial
    | disclosures by CREW
    | ... <https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigations/jared-and-ivanka-made-up-to-640-million-in-the-white-house/>

    And
    |
    | A former aide to former Trump attorney Rudolph Giuliani
    | says he told her the ex-New York City mayor and
    | then-president Donald Trump were offering to sell
    | presidential pardons for $2 million apiece, according to
    | court documents.
    | ... <https://news.yahoo.com/rudy-giuliani-said-trump-were-224039141.html>

    --bks
    ~ Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.

    Irish Mike
    .

    Try drug rehab, Mike. Surely even you can see by now that your life took a wrong turn.
    .

    No, do suicide, like you and your ilk have driven some veterans to do...

    (We all know Coward Irish Mick doesn't have the ''honor' to do that).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Tue May 16 14:17:29 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    .
    .



    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 17 00:55:02 2023
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

    |
    | The Durham report fails to meet William Barr's hype
    |
    | Another special counsel's report, another instance of the
    | former attorney general's pre-spin ultimately falling apart
    | ... <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/16/durham-report-bill-barr-spin/>

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Wed May 17 12:00:14 2023
    On 5/16/2023 7:55 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

    |
    | The Durham report fails to meet William Barr's hype
    |
    | Another special counsel's report, another instance of the
    | former attorney general's pre-spin ultimately falling apart
    | ... <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/16/durham-report-bill-barr-spin/>

    --bks

    You really should have signed in and actually read the story. You
    obviously do NOT read the Washington Post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bradley K. Sherman@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed May 17 20:03:26 2023
    da pickle <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 5/16/2023 7:55 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

    |
    | The Durham report fails to meet William Barr's hype
    |
    | Another special counsel's report, another instance of the
    | former attorney general's pre-spin ultimately falling apart
    | ...
    <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/16/durham-report-bill-barr-spin/>
    You really should have signed in and actually read the story. You
    obviously do NOT read the Washington Post.

    I quoted from the post. You did not. Game, set, match.

    --bks

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Wed May 17 13:17:06 2023
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.

    They always hand out denials at first dummy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Wed May 17 15:44:35 2023
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:36:47 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:17:13 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    They always hand out denials at first dummy.
    .

    I've already sent in my appeal, as directed, dummy.
    (Marked CLASSIFIED because I included the required evidence).

    Oh puhleeze, Classified doesn't even mean shit. Everything is fucking classified. I had a TS SCI access clearance valid for 10 years. Don't fucking do the ALL CAPS shit with me.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Wed May 17 15:36:41 2023
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:17:13 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    They always hand out denials at first dummy.
    .

    I've already sent in my appeal, as directed, dummy.
    (Marked CLASSIFIED because I included the required evidence).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Thu May 18 12:09:18 2023
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:44:41 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:36:47 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:17:13 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    They always hand out denials at first dummy.
    .

    I've already sent in my appeal, as directed, dummy.
    (Marked CLASSIFIED because I included the required evidence).
    .

    Oh puhleeze, Classified doesn't even mean shit.

    Not to you. Not to the review board. They said my classifications didn't do burns. My appeal shows they did.
    .

    Everything is fucking classified.

    Heh, to you. LOL! WRONG!

    I had a TS SCI access clearance valid for 10 years. Don't fucking do the ALL CAPS shit with me.

    TS SCI CLEARANCE IS GOOD FOR 5-YEARS. Eat that CAP SHIT..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to Bradley K. Sherman on Thu May 18 14:29:11 2023
    On 5/17/2023 3:03 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    da pickle <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 5/16/2023 7:55 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

    |
    | The Durham report fails to meet William Barr's hype
    |
    | Another special counsel's report, another instance of the
    | former attorney general's pre-spin ultimately falling apart
    | ...

    <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/16/durham-report-bill-barr-spin/>
    You really should have signed in and actually read the story. You
    obviously do NOT read the Washington Post.

    I quoted from the post. You did not. Game, set, match.

    --bks

    Good try ... you got the lead in for free ... but you did not get the
    meat. You have to pay for that ... you didn't. Try again.

    [And admit, you do NOT read the NY Post.]

    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Thu May 18 14:27:22 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 12:09:23 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:44:41 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:36:47 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:17:13 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    They always hand out denials at first dummy.
    .

    I've already sent in my appeal, as directed, dummy.
    (Marked CLASSIFIED because I included the required evidence).
    .

    Oh puhleeze, Classified doesn't even mean shit.
    Not to you. Not to the review board. They said my classifications didn't do burns. My appeal shows they did.
    .

    Everything is fucking classified.

    Heh, to you. LOL! WRONG!
    I had a TS SCI access clearance valid for 10 years. Don't fucking do the ALL CAPS shit with me.
    TS SCI CLEARANCE IS GOOD FOR 5-YEARS. Eat that CAP SHIT..

    You are a dumbass. Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human. Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Thu May 18 16:56:16 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 2:27:26 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 12:09:23 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:44:41 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 3:36:47 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, May 17, 2023 at 1:17:13 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 2:17:32 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 at 12:41:39 PM UTC-7, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    Irish Mike <[email protected]> wrote:
    ...
    Well I'd say any further conversation between us, on this topic,
    would just be a waste of our time.
    Apology accepted.
    .

    Not by me. I just got my Veterans denial for my Burn Pit injuries.
    They always hand out denials at first dummy.
    .

    I've already sent in my appeal, as directed, dummy.
    (Marked CLASSIFIED because I included the required evidence).
    .

    Oh puhleeze, Classified doesn't even mean shit.
    Not to you. Not to the review board. They said my classifications didn't do burns. My appeal shows they did.
    .

    Everything is fucking classified.

    Heh, to you. LOL! WRONG!
    I had a TS SCI access clearance valid for 10 years. Don't fucking do the ALL CAPS shit with me.
    TS SCI CLEARANCE IS GOOD FOR 5-YEARS. Eat that CAP SHIT..
    .

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.

    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this every five years or if your employer or a government
    agency revokes your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.

    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Thu May 18 17:26:30 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this every five years or if your employer or a government
    agency revokes your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here. Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever shit is now. But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10 years...at least in the military. And, don't go thinking you are special for getting a clearance. I got it quite
    easily and these days I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really think they are giving much attention to background checks when they are handing out 1million TS's?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Thu May 18 17:47:15 2023
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 5:26:33 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this every five years or if your employer or a
    government agency revokes your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    .
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL
    .

    I see the problem here.

    No, you still don’t…
    .
    .

    Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever shit is now.
    .

    LOL. I’m “Googling whatever shit is now?”
    See what I mean about “dumbass hasn’t changed?”
    .
    But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10 years...at least in the military.
    .

    You’ve gone from “Perhaps” to “I’ve heard” to bullshit. Bad try.

    “A Secret clearance is good for 10 years from the date of the investigation, and a TS clearance is good for 5 years.”

    And, don't go thinking you are special for getting a clearance.

    See? (Mine was Top Secret Crypto.)


    I got it quite easily

    LOL! You would not know.
    See what I mean about bullshit? Keep digging that hole..
    .

    … and these days I've heard....

    From who? (Keep whacking that tar baby, it gets sticker)
    .

    … there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really think they are giving much attention
    to background checks when they are handing out 1million TS's?

    Is that what you’re ‘hearing?’

    (Pleas keep digging that hole…)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Fri May 19 07:30:49 2023
    On 5/18/2023 2:29 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/17/2023 3:03 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    da pickle  <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 5/16/2023 7:55 PM, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
    After more than three and a half years and tens of
    millions of taxpayer dollars, special counsel John Durham
    has issued a 300-page report on how the FBI botched the
    Russian Collusion investigation.

       |
       | The Durham report fails to meet William Barr's hype
       |
       | Another special counsel's report, another instance of the
       | former attorney general's pre-spin ultimately falling apart
       | ...

    <https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/16/durham-report-bill-barr-spin/>
    You really should have signed in and actually read the story.  You
    obviously do NOT read the Washington Post.

    I quoted from the post.  You did not. Game, set, match.

         --bks

    Good try ... you got the lead in for free ... but you did not get the
    meat.  You have to pay for that ... you didn't.  Try again.

    [And admit, you do NOT read the NY Post.]

    Come on ... will not hurt to admit it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to jack roth on Fri May 19 07:29:41 2023
    On 5/18/2023 7:26 PM, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this every five years or if your employer or a government
    agency revokes your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here. Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever shit is now. But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10 years...at least in the military. And, don't go thinking you are special for getting a clearance. I got it quite
    easily and these days I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really think they are giving much attention to background checks when they are handing out 1million TS's?

    I got my TS in the late 60's and it worked with the CIA, DIA, NSA, FSTC,
    and others. Included a Byeman third party introduction for some
    programs. I remember the first background check but did not get another
    in the reserves, but did get another big one when I went to work at
    Martin Marietta but never any rechecks ... ever.

    Here are some of my publications:

    “Microwave Guidance Market Analysis,” (Proprietary), Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, 7 May 1975.

    “Practical Prediction of a Laser Beam's Off-Axis Signature,” Proceedings
    of the Technical Program,
    Electro Optical Systems Design Conference - 1974, Industrial and
    Scientific Conference Management, Inc., 1974. (Published as presented at
    the 1974 International Laser Exposition, Civic Center, San Francisco,
    November, 1974.)

    “Prediction of Off-Axis Scattered Signals of a Laser Beam in the Atmosphere,” OR 13,134 and OR 13,134-1, Martin Marietta Corporation,
    Orlando, Florida, May, 1974.

    “Gated Active Low Light Level Television - A primer,” Martin Marietta Corporation,Orlando, Florida, Feb., 1974.

    “A Systems Approach to the National Optical Intelligence Assessment
    Problem (U),” Secret Report OR 12,823, Martin Marietta Corporation,
    Orlando, Florida, October, 1973.

    “Salient Sensor Characteristics for Low Light Level Television Systems,” with Dr. Dimitri G. Theodorou,
    Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Volume 33B, Academic
    Press, New York and London, 1972, edited by L. Marion, Smithsonian
    Institution, Washington, D.C., (Published as presented at the Fifth
    Symposium on Photo-Electronic Image Devices, Imperial College, London, September, 1971.) Translated and published into Japanese by Dalmo-Victor Company, a Textron Division, Belmont, California, 1972.

    “Trends in Louisiana Civilian Employment, By Industry Division
    1960-1967,” with Dr. Forrest H. Pollard,
    The Louisiana Economy, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston,
    Louisiana, December, 1968.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Fri May 26 10:15:08 2023
    On 5/19/2023 7:29 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/18/2023 7:26 PM, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last
    forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after
    you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this
    every five years or if your employer or a government agency revokes
    your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here.  Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever
    shit is now.  But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10
    years...at least in the military.   And, don't go thinking you are
    special for getting a clearance.  I got it quite easily and these days
    I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances.  Do you really
    think they are giving much attention to background checks when they
    are handing out 1million TS's?

    I got my TS in the late 60's and it worked with the CIA, DIA, NSA, FSTC,
    and others.  Included a Byeman third party introduction for some
    programs.  I remember the first background check but did not get another
    in the reserves, but did get another big one when I went to work at
    Martin Marietta but never any rechecks ... ever.

    Here are some of my publications:

    “Microwave Guidance Market Analysis,” (Proprietary), Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, 7 May 1975.

    “Practical Prediction of a Laser Beam's Off-Axis Signature,” Proceedings of the Technical Program,
    Electro Optical Systems Design Conference - 1974, Industrial and
    Scientific Conference Management, Inc., 1974. (Published as presented at
    the 1974 International Laser Exposition, Civic Center, San Francisco, November, 1974.)

    “Prediction of Off-Axis Scattered Signals of a Laser Beam in the Atmosphere,” OR 13,134 and OR 13,134-1, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, May, 1974.

    “Gated Active Low Light Level Television - A primer,” Martin Marietta Corporation,Orlando, Florida, Feb., 1974.

    “A Systems Approach to the National Optical Intelligence Assessment
    Problem (U),” Secret Report OR 12,823, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, October, 1973.

    “Salient Sensor Characteristics for Low Light Level Television Systems,” with Dr. Dimitri G. Theodorou,
    Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Volume 33B, Academic
    Press, New York and London, 1972, edited by L. Marion, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., (Published as presented at the Fifth
    Symposium on Photo-Electronic Image Devices, Imperial College, London, September, 1971.) Translated and published into Japanese by Dalmo-Victor Company, a Textron Division, Belmont, California, 1972.

    “Trends in Louisiana Civilian Employment, By Industry Division 1960-1967,” with Dr. Forrest H. Pollard,
    The Louisiana Economy, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston,
    Louisiana, December, 1968.





    Just for Jerry ... is this what you are looking for?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to da pickle on Fri May 26 11:28:46 2023
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 8:15:38 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/19/2023 7:29 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/18/2023 7:26 PM, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human.
    .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last
    forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after
    you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this
    every five years or if your employer or a government agency revokes
    your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot. >>> "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here. Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever
    shit is now. But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10
    years...at least in the military. And, don't go thinking you are
    special for getting a clearance. I got it quite easily and these days
    I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really
    think they are giving much attention to background checks when they
    are handing out 1million TS's?

    I got my TS in the late 60's and it worked with the CIA, DIA, NSA, FSTC, and others. Included a Byeman third party introduction for some
    programs. I remember the first background check but did not get another in the reserves, but did get another big one when I went to work at
    Martin Marietta but never any rechecks ... ever.

    Here are some of my publications:

    “Microwave Guidance Market Analysis,” (Proprietary), Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, 7 May 1975.

    “Practical Prediction of a Laser Beam's Off-Axis Signature,” Proceedings
    of the Technical Program,
    Electro Optical Systems Design Conference - 1974, Industrial and Scientific Conference Management, Inc., 1974. (Published as presented at the 1974 International Laser Exposition, Civic Center, San Francisco, November, 1974.)

    “Prediction of Off-Axis Scattered Signals of a Laser Beam in the Atmosphere,” OR 13,134 and OR 13,134-1, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, May, 1974.

    “Gated Active Low Light Level Television - A primer,” Martin Marietta Corporation,Orlando, Florida, Feb., 1974.

    “A Systems Approach to the National Optical Intelligence Assessment Problem (U),” Secret Report OR 12,823, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, October, 1973.

    “Salient Sensor Characteristics for Low Light Level Television Systems,”
    with Dr. Dimitri G. Theodorou,
    Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Volume 33B, Academic
    Press, New York and London, 1972, edited by L. Marion, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., (Published as presented at the Fifth Symposium on Photo-Electronic Image Devices, Imperial College, London, September, 1971.) Translated and published into Japanese by Dalmo-Victor Company, a Textron Division, Belmont, California, 1972.

    “Trends in Louisiana Civilian Employment, By Industry Division 1960-1967,” with Dr. Forrest H. Pollard,
    The Louisiana Economy, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston,
    Louisiana, December, 1968.



    Just for Jerry ... is this what you are looking for?
    .

    Yea, that’s it, thanks. (And I just noticed what I was looking for was just a few posts up).

    I'll look though and formulate my question, a little later.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Fri May 26 16:29:43 2023
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:28:50 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 8:15:38 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/19/2023 7:29 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/18/2023 7:26 PM, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human. >>> .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last
    forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after
    you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this >>> every five years or if your employer or a government agency revokes >>> your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here. Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever
    shit is now. But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10
    years...at least in the military. And, don't go thinking you are
    special for getting a clearance. I got it quite easily and these days >> I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really
    think they are giving much attention to background checks when they
    are handing out 1million TS's?

    I got my TS in the late 60's and it worked with the CIA, DIA, NSA, FSTC, and others. Included a Byeman third party introduction for some programs. I remember the first background check but did not get another in the reserves, but did get another big one when I went to work at Martin Marietta but never any rechecks ... ever.

    Here are some of my publications:

    “Microwave Guidance Market Analysis,” (Proprietary), Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, 7 May 1975.

    “Practical Prediction of a Laser Beam's Off-Axis Signature,” Proceedings
    of the Technical Program,
    Electro Optical Systems Design Conference - 1974, Industrial and Scientific Conference Management, Inc., 1974. (Published as presented at the 1974 International Laser Exposition, Civic Center, San Francisco, November, 1974.)

    “Prediction of Off-Axis Scattered Signals of a Laser Beam in the Atmosphere,” OR 13,134 and OR 13,134-1, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, May, 1974.

    “Gated Active Low Light Level Television - A primer,” Martin Marietta
    Corporation,Orlando, Florida, Feb., 1974.

    “A Systems Approach to the National Optical Intelligence Assessment Problem (U),” Secret Report OR 12,823, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, October, 1973.

    “Salient Sensor Characteristics for Low Light Level Television Systems,”
    with Dr. Dimitri G. Theodorou,
    Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Volume 33B, Academic Press, New York and London, 1972, edited by L. Marion, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., (Published as presented at the Fifth Symposium on Photo-Electronic Image Devices, Imperial College, London, September, 1971.) Translated and published into Japanese by Dalmo-Victor Company, a Textron Division, Belmont, California, 1972.

    “Trends in Louisiana Civilian Employment, By Industry Division 1960-1967,” with Dr. Forrest H. Pollard,
    The Louisiana Economy, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston, Louisiana, December, 1968.



    Just for Jerry ... is this what you are looking for?
    .

    Yea, that’s it, thanks. (And I just noticed what I was looking for was just a few posts up).

    I'll look though and formulate my question, a little later.

    BTW, Jerry, how the fuck could you miss the lay up Trump gave you while trying to insult DeSantis. Trump said Cuomo handled covid better than DeSantis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Fri May 26 17:10:25 2023
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 4:29:47 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 11:28:50 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 8:15:38 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/19/2023 7:29 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 5/18/2023 7:26 PM, jack roth wrote:
    On Thursday, May 18, 2023 at 4:56:19 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:

    You are a dumbass.

    Even though I keep proving you are.
    Mine was good for 10 years you ignorant fuck wipe of a loser human. >>> .
    "
    five years
    Even if an agency grants you TS/SCI clearance, it does not last
    forever, so you need to undergo a reinvestigation some time after >>> you've begun working. For TS/SCI clearance, you must usually do this >>> every five years or if your employer or a government agency revokes >>> your clearance for any reason before then.Aug 8, 2022
    "
    .

    Perhaps, the terms of the clearance changed over the years, you idiot.
    "Perhaps" the term for dumbass hasn't. LOL

    I see the problem here. Jerry's dumb ass is just googling whatever
    shit is now. But back in the late 80's, you could get it for 10
    years...at least in the military. And, don't go thinking you are
    special for getting a clearance. I got it quite easily and these days >> I've heard there are over 1M TS security clearances. Do you really
    think they are giving much attention to background checks when they >> are handing out 1million TS's?

    I got my TS in the late 60's and it worked with the CIA, DIA, NSA, FSTC,
    and others. Included a Byeman third party introduction for some programs. I remember the first background check but did not get another
    in the reserves, but did get another big one when I went to work at Martin Marietta but never any rechecks ... ever.

    Here are some of my publications:

    “Microwave Guidance Market Analysis,” (Proprietary), Martin Marietta
    Corporation, Orlando, Florida, 7 May 1975.

    “Practical Prediction of a Laser Beam's Off-Axis Signature,” Proceedings
    of the Technical Program,
    Electro Optical Systems Design Conference - 1974, Industrial and Scientific Conference Management, Inc., 1974. (Published as presented at
    the 1974 International Laser Exposition, Civic Center, San Francisco, November, 1974.)

    “Prediction of Off-Axis Scattered Signals of a Laser Beam in the Atmosphere,” OR 13,134 and OR 13,134-1, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, May, 1974.

    “Gated Active Low Light Level Television - A primer,” Martin Marietta
    Corporation,Orlando, Florida, Feb., 1974.

    “A Systems Approach to the National Optical Intelligence Assessment Problem (U),” Secret Report OR 12,823, Martin Marietta Corporation, Orlando, Florida, October, 1973.

    “Salient Sensor Characteristics for Low Light Level Television Systems,”
    with Dr. Dimitri G. Theodorou,
    Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics, Volume 33B, Academic Press, New York and London, 1972, edited by L. Marion, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., (Published as presented at the Fifth Symposium on Photo-Electronic Image Devices, Imperial College, London, September, 1971.) Translated and published into Japanese by Dalmo-Victor
    Company, a Textron Division, Belmont, California, 1972.

    “Trends in Louisiana Civilian Employment, By Industry Division 1960-1967,” with Dr. Forrest H. Pollard,
    The Louisiana Economy, Louisiana Polytechnic Institute, Ruston, Louisiana, December, 1968.



    Just for Jerry ... is this what you are looking for?
    .

    Yea, that’s it, thanks. (And I just noticed what I was looking for was just a few posts up).

    I'll look though and formulate my question, a little later.
    .

    BTW, Jerry,

    Fuck off, buttboy, you got questions to answer...
    .
    .
    .
    .


    how the fuck could you miss the lay up Trump gave you while trying to insult DeSantis. Trump said Cuomo handled covid better than DeSantis.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jack roth@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Fri May 26 17:23:38 2023
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 5:10:28 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:


    RIP Jerry. June is almost here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to jack roth on Sat May 27 07:18:08 2023
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 5:23:41 PM UTC-7, jack roth wrote:
    On Friday, May 26, 2023 at 5:10:28 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:


    RIP Jerry. June is almost here.

    Good boy. Sit. Stay. .. Okay, now RUN from those questions... RUN!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)