• Suicide for America

    From Irish Mike@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 22 05:37:54 2023
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday, admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit: that
    electing an octogenarian in obvious decline for another four years
    could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..

    Irish Mike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Popinjay@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Sat Apr 22 09:00:39 2023
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:37:58 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:


    Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..



    Re-electing the people that Joe Biden works for, would be suicidal for America.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Sat Apr 22 12:35:54 2023
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:37:58 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday,
    .

    So what was their argument? It's can't age because they argued that last time on Biden, and
    trump is THAT age now. (Or are they also arguing Trump should run?)
    .
    (You are SO easy...)
    (See why Mick can never reply to me?)
    .
    .

    admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit:
    .

    First, Idiot Mick, show us your "Public understands." (See why Mick runs?)
    .
    .
    that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline
    .

    What 'obvious?' the fact you still don't know he's a stutterer?
    (Mick will R&H from this one, too).
    .
    .

    for another four years could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second
    term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."
    .

    THIS is statement they made against Trump when he ran?
    .
    .

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..
    .

    **YAWN** Then you should have no trouble showing that.

    Running Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Sat Apr 22 13:16:44 2023
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 12:35:57 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:37:58 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday,
    .

    So what was their argument? It's can't age because they argued that last time on Biden, and
    trump is THAT age now. (Or are they also arguing Trump should run?)
    .
    (You are SO easy...)
    (See why Mick can never reply to me?)
    .
    .
    admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit:
    .


    ~ First, Idiot Mick, show us your "Public understands." (See why Mick runs?)


    RGP understands something. LOL.



    that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline
    .

    What 'obvious?' the fact you still don't know he's a stutterer?
    (Mick will R&H from this one, too).
    .
    .
    for another four years could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second
    term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."
    .

    THIS is statement they made against Trump when he ran?
    .
    .

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..
    .

    **YAWN** Then you should have no trouble showing that.

    Running Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to risky biz on Sat Apr 22 17:25:28 2023
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 1:16:48 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 12:35:57 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 5:37:58 AM UTC-7, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday,
    .

    So what was their argument? It's can't age because they argued that last time on Biden, and
    trump is THAT age now. (Or are they also arguing Trump should run?)
    .
    .


    *** No reply noted ***
    .
    .
    .



    (You are SO easy...)
    (See why Mick can never reply to me?)
    .
    .
    admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit:
    .

    ~ First, Idiot Mick, show us your "Public understands." (See why Mick runs?)


    RGP understands something. LOL.
    that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline
    .

    What 'obvious?' the fact you still don't know he's a stutterer?
    (Mick will R&H from this one, too).
    .
    .
    for another four years could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second
    term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."
    .

    THIS is statement they made against Trump when he ran?
    .
    .

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..
    .

    **YAWN** Then you should have no trouble showing that.

    Running Irish Mick

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From C Mayhem@21:1/5 to Irish Mike on Wed Apr 26 14:28:59 2023
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:37:58 AM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday, admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit: that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline for another four years
    could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..

    Irish Mike
    What's he going to do, eat pudding and take a nap on the couch? We've had way worse.

    C

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to C Mayhem on Wed Apr 26 17:03:32 2023
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, C Mayhem wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:37:58 AM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday, admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit: that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline for another four years
    could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..

    Irish Mike
    What's he going to do, eat pudding and take a nap on the couch? We've had way worse.

    C

    These fools have no idea how upper management works. It’s ALWAYS a Board Consensus at the top. Watch those war movies to get the idea. All the Generals and Admirals have assistants (of just under their rank). A smart boss always asks, “Ideas
    gentlemen?” Or, “We have a consensus on this?” Or, “I believe that’s what “we’ll’ do.” It’s the old, two heads are better than one. And “Yes men” aren’t allowed; they don’t like taking the blame.

    The Japanese are the worst. A friend of mine was a salesman and he said management takes HOURS for reach a big money decision. The leader keeps asking his underlings to commit, and they’re not going to, they make suggestions, and ask questions, and on
    and on. ‘Who’s neck is on the line if his fails.’ He said their decisions making was a bad as their food. (He always brought can food to heat in his hotel room. He ‘hated Chinese food’).

    Presidents of the United States are no different. Get the Cabinet together and toss it around. “How will this decision effect the next election.” “How can we slip this in the budget?” “How many votes will we lose in (state)?” “Will this get
    through the Senate?” “Will Governor (x) still get enough votes.” It isn’t “one man one vote” at that level. These questions are all answered before it gets to Biden.

    Ask BillB, he's worked at those levels..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to VegasJerry on Thu Apr 27 09:13:19 2023
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 5:03:35 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, C Mayhem wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:37:58 AM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday, admit reports he is likely to announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit: that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline for another four years
    could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..

    Irish Mike
    What's he going to do, eat pudding and take a nap on the couch? We've had way worse.

    C

    ~ These fools have no idea how upper management works. It’s ALWAYS a Board Consensus at the top. Watch those war movies to get the idea. All the Generals and Admirals have assistants (of just under their rank). A smart boss always asks, “Ideas
    gentlemen?” Or, “We have a consensus on this?” Or, “I believe that’s what “we’ll’ do.” It’s the old, two heads are better than one. And “Yes men” aren’t allowed; they don’t like taking the blame.

    The Japanese are the worst. A friend of mine was a salesman and he said management takes HOURS for reach a big money decision. The leader keeps asking his underlings to commit, and they’re not going to, they make suggestions, and ask questions, and
    on and on. ‘Who’s neck is on the line if his fails.’ He said their decisions making was a bad as their food. (He always brought can food to heat in his hotel room. He ‘hated Chinese food’).

    Presidents of the United States are no different. Get the Cabinet together and toss it around. “How will this decision effect the next election.” “How can we slip this in the budget?” “How many votes will we lose in (state)?” “Will this
    get through the Senate?” “Will Governor (x) still get enough votes.” It isn’t “one man one vote” at that level. These questions are all answered before it gets to Biden.

    Ask BillB, he's worked at those levels..


    That was really enlightening, Jerry. You must be the only one here who had any idea how effective executive decisionmaking occurs. Or, rather, you and Blabbermouth, that is.

    It's reassuring to hope that if Biden develops full-blown dementia, as you have, he will be surrounded by really smart people who can make decisions for him. All vetted by the same 'brain trust' that can't come up with better presidentiual candidates
    than Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. LOL.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to risky biz on Thu Apr 27 11:19:38 2023
    On Thursday, April 27, 2023 at 9:13:23 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 5:03:35 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
    On Wednesday, April 26, 2023 at 2:29:03 PM UTC-7, C Mayhem wrote:
    On Saturday, April 22, 2023 at 7:37:58 AM UTC-5, Irish Mike wrote:
    "The Wall Street Journal editorial board argued President Joe Biden
    is too old to run for re-election Friday, admit reports he is likely to
    announce his 2024 bid next week.

    "The public understands what Mr. Biden apparently won’t admit: that electing an octogenarian in obvious decline for another four years could be an historic mistake," the editors wrote.

    The editors continued, "asking the country to elect a man who is 80 years old and whose second term would end when he is 86 is a risky act that borders on selfish."

    Not just selfish. Re-electing Joe Biden would be suicidal for America..

    Irish Mike
    What's he going to do, eat pudding and take a nap on the couch? We've had way worse.

    C
    .

    ~ These fools have no idea how upper management works. It’s ALWAYS a Board Consensus at the top. Watch those war movies to get the idea. All the Generals and Admirals have assistants (of just under their rank). A smart boss always asks, “Ideas
    gentlemen?” Or, “We have a consensus on this?” Or, “I believe that’s what “we’ll’ do.” It’s the old, two heads are better than one. And “Yes men” aren’t allowed; they don’t like taking the blame.

    The Japanese are the worst. A friend of mine was a salesman and he said management takes HOURS for reach a big money decision. The leader keeps asking his underlings to commit, and they’re not going to, they make suggestions, and ask questions, and
    on and on. ‘Who’s neck is on the line if his fails.’ He said their decisions making was a bad as their food. (He always brought can food to heat in his hotel room. He ‘hated Chinese food’).

    Presidents of the United States are no different. Get the Cabinet together and toss it around. “How will this decision effect the next election.” “How can we slip this in the budget?” “How many votes will we lose in (state)?” “Will this
    get through the Senate?” “Will Governor (x) still get enough votes.” It isn’t “one man one vote” at that level. These questions are all answered before it gets to Biden.

    Ask BillB, he's worked at those levels..
    .

    That was really enlightening, Jerry.
    .

    You’re welcome. You’ve always needed enlightenment, risky.
    It’s called seeking council.
    .
    .

    You must be the only one here who had any idea how effective executive decisionmaking occurs.
    .

    No. Like I said, Ask BillB.
    .

    Or, rather, you and Blabbermouth, that is.

    See how enlistment works?
    .
    .

    It's reassuring to hope that if Biden develops full-blown dementia, as you have,
    .

    Oh, and you were doing so well. As usually, no answers, just childish name calling..
    .
    .
    .




    he will be surrounded by really smart people who can make decisions for him. All vetted by the same 'brain trust' that can't come up with better presidentiual candidates than Joe Biden and Kamala Harris. LOL.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)