Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
If I survived PokerSpot I can survive this.
Thank GOD you recovered ... what was it? Anyway, welcome back ... we
were worried and hope all is OK now.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 4:52:59 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
Thank GOD you recovered ... what was it? Anyway, welcome back ... we
were worried and hope all is OK now.
I'm still worried. He made two posts, both the same about Poker Spot. Sounds serious.
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote: >>>>> Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it inhis budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote: >>>>> Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote: >>>>>>> Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only beable to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
.No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before
the midterms.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare >> get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no >> lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer >> ... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not >> be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only be
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
.No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
.Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
..No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
.Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 3:21:24 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
.No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
.Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
.And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
See? Dodge & Run Coward...
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 4:49:43 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 3:21:24 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:.
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
.All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
~ *** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
See? Dodge & Run Coward...
Paul 100% right.
Jerry and Blab, 100% wrong.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it
able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need >>>> not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do >>>> have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the >>>> payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible. >>>> Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare >>>> get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no >>>> lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer >>>> ... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not >>>> be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only be
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION
be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need >>>> not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do >>>> have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the >>>> payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible. >>>> Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare >>>> get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no >>>> lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer >>>> ... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added). >>>> Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
much MORE?
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Here are more: https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 4:49:43 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 3:21:24 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
.No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
.Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
.And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
~ *** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***Paul 100% right.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
See? Dodge & Run Coward...
Jerry and Blab, 100% wrong.
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:06:16 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 4:49:43 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 3:21:24 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ *** No Answer Yet Again ***
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:.
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
.All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions beforeNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you can't show that I was.
the midterms.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***Paul 100% right.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
See? Dodge & Run Coward...
Jerry and Blab, 100% wrong.
Yet you can't answer...
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION
be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need >>>>>> not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do >>>>>> have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the >>>>>> payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible. >>>>>> Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare >>>>>> get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no >>>>>> lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer >>>>>> ... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not >>>>>> be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added). >>>>>> Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and >>>> Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION
be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything. >>>>>
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added). >>>>>> Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will only
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and >>>> Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road. >>
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>> On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything. >>>>>
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not >> rocket science.
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>> On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>> On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything. >>>>>
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." >> There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything. >>>>>>>>>
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans will
.~ It's not?~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how >>>>>> much MORE?
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and >>>>>>>> Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science. >>>>>> You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not >>>>>> rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ... >>>>>
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road. >>>>>>
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; >>>>>> the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." >>>>>> There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism.
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
~ Social Security is insurance.
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries. Actuaries determine how to balance income and assets against future obligations. Have you ever noticed headlines that begin with, 'Social Security will run out of money in ..'?
No? OK. Continue.
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>> On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
will only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans
rocket science.
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science. >> You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they >> already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." >> There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
.It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
~ Social Security is insurance.
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries.
Actuaries determine how to balance income and assets against future obligations. Have you ever noticed headlines that begin with, 'Social Security will run out of money in ..'?
No? OK. Continue.
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:27:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
will only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they >> already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
~ Social Security is insurance..
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries.Yep, you're ignorant. Now reply for everybody to see:
Am I correct? Social Security is insurance?
(Or do your Dodge & Run)
LOL!
Actuaries determine how to balance income and assets against future obligations. Have you ever noticed headlines that begin with, 'Social Security will run out of money in ..'?
No? OK. Continue.
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 11:18:57 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:27:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't
will only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up.
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air?
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
~ Social Security is insurance..
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries.Yep, you're ignorant. Now reply for everybody to see:
Am I correct? Social Security is insurance?
(Or do your Dodge & Run)
You aren't coherent enough for an adult discussion, Jerry.
Actuaries determine how to balance income and assets against future obligations. Have you ever noticed headlines that begin with, 'Social Security will run out of money in ..'?
No? OK. Continue.
The old saw of 'socialist Sweden' is a good example. I have limited knowledge of Sweden overall but I do know it has a vibrant capitalist sector.
On 3/14/2023 1:44 PM, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:06:16 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 4:49:43 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 3:21:24 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ *** No Answer Yet Again ***
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 12:23:04 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 2:15:27 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> ~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay >>>>>>>>>> wrote:.
.Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me..
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, andIs that what Yellin is yelling about?
pre-existing conditions exclusions?
.
*** No Reply Noted Again ***
.
.
.All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of >>>>>>>>> to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
.
*** Nothing Shown Again ***
.
.
.~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic.
.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
.
.
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, andNo I was not, and like all your dodging and running above, you
pre-existing conditions exclusions before
the midterms.
can't show that I was.
You're getting to be like
The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully.
Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even MENTION
it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs
to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
Enough with your Chatty Cathy act, Jerry. Broken record.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***Paul 100% right.
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
*** No Answer Yet Again ***
See? Dodge & Run Coward...
Jerry and Blab, 100% wrong.
Yet you can't answer...
In what way are you expressing yourself when you use the word "answer"?
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 2:43:04 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:even MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 11:18:57 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:27:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote:
On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above.
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic. >>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't
Americans will only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as
constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up. >>>>>>
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest
You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air? >>>
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science.
rocket science.
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they
already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries."
There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
~ It's not?Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism..
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
~ Social Security is insurance..
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries.Yep, you're ignorant. Now reply for everybody to see:
*** KNEW YOU COULDN'T ANSWER ***Am I correct? Social Security is insurance?
And the answer is:(Or do your Dodge & Run)You aren't coherent enough for an adult discussion, Jerry.
*** DODGE AND RUN ***
(Do you even know what insurance is?)
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 3:56:14 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:MENTION it in his budget. It's just sitting there waiting for the Repubs to tear it to pieces the next chance they get.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 2:43:04 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, March 15, 2023 at 11:18:57 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 5:27:56 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:29:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote: >>>>>> On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 4:13:05 PM UTC-7, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 3:02:01 PM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>> On 3/14/2023 1:19 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2023 at 9:48:16 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On 3/13/2023 5:20 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 11:25:50 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/13/2023 12:51 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, March 13, 2023 at 8:53:11 AM UTC-7, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 3/12/2023 4:15 PM, risky biz wrote:
~ On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 1:51:20 PM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 10:17:49 AM UTC-7, risky biz wrote:~ About what? (Answer that right after you "Show us," above. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 at 8:38:06 AM UTC-7, VegasJerry wrote:
On Saturday, March 11, 2023 at 9:43:33 PM UTC-8, Paul Popinjay wrote:
Janet Yellin says not to panic.
SO YOU BETTER PANIC.
~ Do that for us, will ya? None of this bothers me.. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
No longer frantic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions?Is that what Yellin is yelling about?
All while the Democrats are doing everything they can think of to give the Republicans the White
House AND the Senate in 2024.
Show us.
I'll try to not laugh when you go Über-spastic. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
You were going spastic about Medicare, Social Security, and pre-existing conditions exclusions before the midterms. The Repubs flopped so now you went back to grazing peacefully. Meanwhile Biden said he would 'shore up' SS. Doesn't even
will only be able to take 3 vacations a year rather than 5, attend the repulsively expensive Superbowl occasionally rather than every single year, and have to buy a new C300 every other year rather than an SL500?
And show yourself. It isn't my job to force-feed you everything.
~ Risky, do you think SS and Medicare can go on and on and on as >>>>>>>>>>>>>> constructed at present? If you think everything is all right, you need
not answer ... but if you think these programs are "in trouble" ... do
have any thoughts about how they might be shored up. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
I believe that SS was doomed from the beginning. People think that the
payments they make are for "their" payments when they become eligible.
Many also believed that "lock box" stuff too. People receiving medicare
get their payments from those currently making payments ... there is no
lock box. The population is changing ... people are living a lot longer
... maybe those actually making the payments into SS will eventually not
be able to make it happen any more (even with "printed" money added).
Any other thoughts?
The U.S.A. can afford Social Security. It is only in 'trouble' because of the exorbitant largesse poured onto what are already the most privileged. The tax structure needs to be adjusted. Am I supposed to cry if the wealthiest Americans
*** KNEW YOU COULDN'T ANSWER ***.~ Social Security is insurance..~ It's not?rocket science.
~ I am surprised that you believe that. What "adjustment" solves SS and
Medicare and stops the creation of money out of thin air? >>>>>>>>>>>
Those who economically benefit most pay more. Not rocket science. >>>>>>>>>> You are correct ... those who economically benefit do pay more ... not
EXACTLY how much more do EXACTLY who must pay even more than they >>>>>>>>>> already pay more than those who collect?
There is not a direct correlation between Social Security and money creation. Money creation finances a lot more than Social Security and money creation is only necessitated because some don't pay enough taxes.Again, I agree that money creation does finance a lot more than SS ...
~ however, details of EXACTLY how which "some" need to pay EXACTLY how
much MORE?
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/dTfb2Ma9Zyg/m/kv7vIITIBAAJ
The devil is in the details. In my opinion, there is an end of the road.
I think it is you that does not like Churchill ...
~ "The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of miseries." >>>>>>>>>> There are others, of course.
Social Security isn't 'socialism'.
Here are more:
https://fee.org/articles/6-quotes-that-explain-why-capitalism-is-preferable-to-socialism/amp?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh2gTMtfZDSTuo_iyKnUstNf7Pn-6tXyDQ4zflpII-Ks4rQDNFCB5BQaAk2zEALw_wcB
What is it?
It's a social welfare program and, properly implemented, it's compatible with capitalism.
Oh ! Wait! They MUST take that back. You ARE ignorant.
LOL. Insurance companies have actuaries.Yep, you're ignorant. Now reply for everybody to see:
Am I correct? Social Security is insurance?
And the answer is:You aren't coherent enough for an adult discussion, Jerry.
(Or do your Dodge & Run)
*** DODGE AND RUN ***
(Do you even know what insurance is?)
Looks like we'll take your Run & Hide as a, No...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 07:55:13 |
| Calls: | 12,100 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,941 |