For one recent example, look at those five cops in Memphis charged with murder for beating that poor frail black man to death (disgusting). Had they read my recent posts on the unlawful use of lethal force and the leading constitutional case law on the
issue, one or all of them might have thought twice before putting themselves in such grave legal peril. Now their lives are ruined.

On the other hand, it can cut both ways. Those cops obviously weren't very bright, so they might have fallen for one riskytard's recent idiotic posts and believed that's it's okay to ignore the Constitution and slaughter people for minor crimes just
because some mayor in Texas did it 100 years ago and got away with it (what riskytard called "the common law" lol).

So yes, reading RGP can save your life, but be selective about your sources. There are some real dummies on RGP too!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 2:31:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

For one recent example, look at those five cops in Memphis charged with murder for beating that poor
frail black man to death (disgusting). Had they read my recent posts on the unlawful use of lethal force
and the leading constitutional case law on the issue, one or all of them might have thought twice before
putting themselves in such grave legal peril.

.

And another example is you claiming a man guilty because you misread a video and found out later that
you were wrong.
.

Now their lives are ruined.

.

Because you, again, convicted them before the trial.
.

On the other hand, it can cut both ways.

.

Like I just showed.
.

Those cops obviously weren't very bright

.

See? You’ve incorrectly convicted them and misassigned ignorance; yet you yourself still refuse to admit
the courts proved you wrong in YOUR assessment of a video. Seems, YOU’RE the ‘not very bright.’
.

so they might have fallen for one riskytard's recent idiotic posts and believed that's it's okay to ignore
the Constitution and slaughter people for minor crimes just because some mayor in Texas did it 100 years
ago and got away with it (what riskytard called "the common law" lol).

.

Errors like that. No, you’re simply not very bright..
.

So yes, reading RGP can save your life, but be selective about your sources.

.

As we’ve shown, ‘ not yours.’
.

There are some real dummies on RGP too!

As we’ve shown, You..

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

~ On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 2:31:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

< 🍼 >


It's remarkable that a 60-year-old senior citizen like you would, day after day, devote most of his waking hours to behaving like a 4-year-old.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 11:46:21 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

~ On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 2:31:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

< 🍼 >

It's remarkable that a 60-year-old senior citizen like you would, day after day, devote most of his waking hours to behaving like a 4-year-old.

It's remarkable that you would be so obsessed with a 4-year-old. How long have you had these romantic feelings toward children?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 6:34:31 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 11:46:21 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

~ On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 2:31:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

< 🍼 >

It's remarkable that a 60-year-old senior citizen like you would, day after day, devote most of his waking hours to behaving like a 4-year-old.

~ It's remarkable that you would be so obsessed with a 4-year-old. How long have you had these romantic feelings toward children?


Thanks for illustrating exactly what I described.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 10:36:19 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 6:34:31 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 11:46:21 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

~ On Friday, January 27, 2023 at 2:31:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

< 🍼 >

It's remarkable that a 60-year-old senior citizen like you would, day after day, devote most of his waking hours to behaving like a 4-year-old.

~ It's remarkable that you would be so obsessed with a 4-year-old. How long have you had these romantic feelings toward children?

Thanks for illustrating exactly what I described.

.

Yea; and dodging my post that also exposed him..

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)