• Blabbermouth's victim act

    From risky biz@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 19 10:42:10 2023
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to risky biz on Fri Jan 20 00:11:05 2023
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.

    Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course). I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference it in that thread (more
    than a decade ago!). That's just one more reason I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting
    on Ramashiva, despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have a discussion with her face to face.
    That could have gone south in a hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Fri Jan 20 12:47:37 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:11:09 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.


    ~ Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course). I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference it in that thread (more
    than a decade ago!).


    A pathological lie is not a 'reference'. Your inability to document the allegation, then or now, is an admission that it was a lie.


    ~ That's just one more reason I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on Ramashiva,
    despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have a discussion with her face to face. That could have
    gone south in a hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.


    Stop making excuses for actual stalking behavior while, at the same time, whining and whimpering that exposure of your pathological lying is 'stalking'. It's pretty creepy and weird how you compile dossiers on anyone who disagrees with you at RGP. You
    must be living a hellish life if you have time for that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to BillB on Fri Jan 20 14:47:06 2023
    On 1/20/2023 2:11 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ >>

    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.

    Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course).

    WHAT ... " "COWARDLY ANONYMITY" oh, the irony

    I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference
    it in that thread (more than a decade ago!). That's just one more reason
    I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she
    used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me
    was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on
    Ramashiva, despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings
    that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort
    of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have
    a discussion with her face to face. That could have gone south in a
    hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to risky biz on Fri Jan 20 15:09:02 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:47:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:11:09 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.
    ~ Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course). I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference it in that thread (more
    than a decade ago!).


    A pathological lie is not a 'reference'. Your inability to document the allegation, then or now, is an admission that it was a lie.

    I guess it could seem that way to someone with your piss poor logic skills.

    ~ That's just one more reason I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on Ramashiva,
    despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have a discussion with her face to face. That could have
    gone south in a hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.


    Stop making excuses for actual stalking behavior while, at the same time, whining and whimpering that exposure of your pathological lying is 'stalking'. It's pretty creepy and weird how you compile dossiers on anyone who disagrees with you at RGP. You
    must be living a hellish life if you have time for that.

    I didn't stalk anyone and I don't "compile dossiers" on anyone. You are clearly mentally ill, and you are just projecting because you let it slip out that you have searched every public database on the internet to find information on me. You really need
    a good psychiatrist. Get a life of your own.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 01:06:27 2023
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 3:09:06 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:47:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:11:09 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.
    ~ Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course). I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference it in that thread (
    more than a decade ago!).



    A pathological lie is not a 'reference'. Your inability to document the allegation, then or now, is an admission that it was a lie.


    ~ I guess it could seem that way to someone with your piss poor logic skills.


    Oh, I see. Your inability to provide a shred of documentation that your accusation was true, then or now, is proof, that it's true? You think someone is going to believe that's logical?


    ~ That's just one more reason I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on Ramashiva,
    despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have a discussion with her face to face. That could have
    gone south in a hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.


    Stop making excuses for actual stalking behavior while, at the same time, whining and whimpering that exposure of your pathological lying is 'stalking'. It's pretty creepy and weird how you compile dossiers on anyone who disagrees with you at RGP.
    You must be living a hellish life if you have time for that.


    ~ I didn't stalk anyone and I don't "compile dossiers" on anyone.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 1, 2018: 'Just to set the record straight since Ramashiva isn't here to defend himself, the name Ramashiva gave was not "unrelated". It was Bea's same-sex partner, living at the same residence. Also, Ramashiva did make it clear at the
    time that he wasn't 100% sure that that was Bea's real name, but, as it turns out, his online detective work was worthy of his claimed 200+ IQ. Had he decided to carry his investigation any further, it is almost certain he would have uncovered the whole
    truth in very little time.' https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/6GLuoB06_rs/m/XKxEfT0fDwAJ

    Blabbermouth, Sep 6, 2013: 'OT: If Joe Long (Truthseeker) really makes "six figures"
    ...as he bragged the other day, I have a few questions.
    1. Why is he a deadbeat who doesn't pay his bills?
    2. Why is his home being auctioned out from under him next month?
    3. Why can't he make the payments on a measly 400k mortgage?
    4. Why would he take a 400k sub-prime, interest-only loan at a whopping
    6.25%? https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/A6YCiyYWHKk/m/NI-qmcXlQh8J


    ~ You are clearly mentally ill, and you are just projecting because you let it slip out that you have searched every public database on the internet to find information on me. You really need a good psychiatrist. Get a life of your own.


    You were prancing around blabbing that your name appears on the rolls of the Law Society of British Columbia. You apparently thought someone was dying to know. You're a pathological liar so I looked at the B.C. lawyer directory and your name DID NOT
    appear there. When I questioned you about that it precipitated a weeks long personal meltdown for you. You now feel it necessary to pretend that I 'searched every public database on the internet to find information on' you. LOL. SAD. No. Just the B.C.
    online Law Directory. You're compelled to pretend otherwise now because you feel like an absolute fool after whining and whimpering about 'stalkers' only to have it now revealed that 'stalker' is a perfect description of you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to risky biz on Sat Jan 21 03:06:38 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:06:31 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 3:09:06 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:47:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Friday, January 20, 2023 at 12:11:09 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ


    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.
    ~ Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly anonymity, of course). I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference it in that thread (
    more than a decade ago!).



    A pathological lie is not a 'reference'. Your inability to document the allegation, then or now, is an admission that it was a lie.
    ~ I guess it could seem that way to someone with your piss poor logic skills.


    Oh, I see. Your inability to provide a shred of documentation that your accusation was true, then or now, is proof, that it's true? You think someone is going to believe that's logical?
    ~ That's just one more reason I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on Ramashiva,
    despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have a discussion with her face to face. That could have
    gone south in a hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.


    Stop making excuses for actual stalking behavior while, at the same time, whining and whimpering that exposure of your pathological lying is 'stalking'. It's pretty creepy and weird how you compile dossiers on anyone who disagrees with you at RGP.
    You must be living a hellish life if you have time for that.
    ~ I didn't stalk anyone and I don't "compile dossiers" on anyone.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 1, 2018: 'Just to set the record straight since Ramashiva isn't here to defend himself, the name Ramashiva gave was not "unrelated". It was Bea's same-sex partner, living at the same residence. Also, Ramashiva did make it clear at the
    time that he wasn't 100% sure that that was Bea's real name, but, as it turns out, his online detective work was worthy of his claimed 200+ IQ. Had he decided to carry his investigation any further, it is almost certain he would have uncovered the whole
    truth in very little time.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/6GLuoB06_rs/m/XKxEfT0fDwAJ

    You are dumb. I wrote that in 2018. Everything there was known information.


    Blabbermouth, Sep 6, 2013: 'OT: If Joe Long (Truthseeker) really makes "six figures"
    ...as he bragged the other day, I have a few questions.
    1. Why is he a deadbeat who doesn't pay his bills?
    2. Why is his home being auctioned out from under him next month?
    3. Why can't he make the payments on a measly 400k mortgage?
    4. Why would he take a 400k sub-prime, interest-only loan at a whopping 6.25%? https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/A6YCiyYWHKk/m/NI-qmcXlQh8J

    As I said at the time, that was information that was emailed to me by one of Joe's many enemies. It was coming out one way or the other. I just offered to do the honors. If you want to know who that person was, just look at the list of people he was
    harassing repeatedly calling a "welcher" (I was only one of them).

    ~ You are clearly mentally ill, and you are just projecting because you let it slip out that you have searched every public database on the internet to find information on me. You really need a good psychiatrist. Get a life of your own.


    You were prancing around blabbing that your name appears on the rolls of the Law Society of British Columbia. You apparently thought someone was dying to know. You're a pathological liar so I looked at the B.C. lawyer directory and your name DID NOT
    appear there. When I questioned you about that it precipitated a weeks long personal meltdown for you. You now feel it necessary to pretend that I 'searched every public database on the internet to find information on' you. LOL. SAD. No. Just the B.C.
    online Law Directory. You're compelled to pretend otherwise now because you feel like an absolute fool after whining and whimpering about 'stalkers' only to have it now revealed that 'stalker' is a perfect description of you.

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 05:16:11 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL

    "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat Jan 21 06:06:12 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:59:21 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    If you think I am "anonymous" then your Alzheimer's is even worse than I thought. There is nobody here except the dumbest of the dumb who doesn't know my real name is William Bradley and that I live in Vancouver, BC.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat Jan 21 07:59:17 2023
    On 1/20/2023 2:47 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/20/2023 2:11 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Thursday, January 19, 2023 at 10:42:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    Blabbermouth, Mar 27, 2012: 'So you can't rub two brain cells
    together and figure out why I wouldn't want an internet search of my
    name turning up allegations of criminal behavior?'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/fQZDHcHA_QM/m/dlyduP83P0AJ >>>

    Bullshit. Go ahead. Show me an internet search link on your name that
    produces a link where you are accused of criminal behavior.

    Ooh. Poor baby. You're the real victim. Psychopath.

    Oh, thanks for reminding me. Yes, she did repeatedly and falsely
    accuse me of serious criminal behavior (from her perch of cowardly
    anonymity, of course).

    WHAT ... "    "COWARDLY ANONYMITY"  oh, the irony

    I'm not going to go look for it and repeat it here, but I did reference
    it in that thread (more than a decade ago!). That's just one more reason
    I mocked her when Ramashiva finally pierced the anonymity shield she
    used to harass and libel people (including me). But what she did to me
    was nothing compared to the cruelty she was gleefully inflicting on Ramashiva, despite his numerous requests for her to stop and warnings
    that he would eventually retaliate in kind. And he did, in a mild sort
    of way. She's lucky he didn't drive up to Oregon in his Tercel and have
    a discussion with her face to face. That could have gone south in a
    hurry. But he always said he was a man of great compassion.

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 09:55:04 2023
    On 1/21/2023 8:06 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:59:21 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    If you think I am "anonymous" then your Alzheimer's is even worse than I thought. There is nobody here except the dumbest of the dumb who doesn't know my real name is William Bradley and that I live in Vancouver, BC.

    Blab on anonymous coward.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat Jan 21 08:09:14 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 7:55:11 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/21/2023 8:06 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:59:21 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    If you think I am "anonymous" then your Alzheimer's is even worse than I thought. There is nobody here except the dumbest of the dumb who doesn't know my real name is William Bradley and that I live in Vancouver, BC.
    Blab on anonymous coward.

    You have nothing. It must be sad to be your age and still seeking attention by making a fool of yourself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 11:14:37 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL

    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?


    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as
    an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet
    another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 12:42:12 2023
    On 1/21/2023 10:09 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 7:55:11 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/21/2023 8:06 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:59:21 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    If you think I am "anonymous" then your Alzheimer's is even worse than I thought. There is nobody here except the dumbest of the dumb who doesn't know my real name is William Bradley and that I live in Vancouver, BC.
    Blab on anonymous coward.

    You have nothing. It must be sad to be your age and still seeking attention by making a fool of yourself.

    Ah, blab on Blab. Shout your lie that you are real.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From VegasJerry@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat Jan 21 11:45:17 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 7:55:11 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/21/2023 8:06 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:59:21 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

    And the cowardly anonymity continues to this very day.

    If you think I am "anonymous" then your Alzheimer's is even worse than I thought. There is nobody here except the dumbest of the dumb who doesn't know my real name is William Bradley and that I live in Vancouver, BC.
    .
    Blab on anonymous coward.
    .

    LOL. Says the anonymous coward...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to risky biz on Sat Jan 21 13:26:54 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there
    as an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in
    yet another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on "any public database." The stalker is shamed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Sat Jan 21 16:14:49 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details. To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed
    there as an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in
    yet another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️


    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do your crying somewhere else.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to risky biz on Sat Jan 21 16:20:32 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed
    there as an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed
    in yet another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do your crying somewhere else.

    There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to BillB on Sun Jan 22 08:38:13 2023
    On 1/21/2023 6:20 PM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ



    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details. >>>> To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️



    There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.


    You said you were listed ... you are not ... you are a liar. You just
    admitted you are just an anonymous internet coward.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sun Jan 22 07:09:09 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 6:38:17 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/21/2023 6:20 PM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ



    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️
    There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.
    You said you were listed ... you are not ... you are a liar. You just admitted you are just an anonymous internet coward.

    No, I said my name is on the rolls of the Law Society of BC. What he checked there (and God only knows why) is simply a list of current dues paying members. I thought you said you were a lawyer back in the Middle Ages? You should understand that.
    Appearing on the rolls means you were called to the bar in that jurisdiction and have not been disbarred. If I wanted to be a current member (which I do not), I could go in and write a test, pay them a bunch of money, and they'd put me on that list
    riskytard quoted within the week. I can do that because I appear on the rolls of the Law Society. HTH.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Sun Jan 22 08:13:26 2023
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed
    there as an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-
    handed in yet another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial
    status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From risky biz@21:1/5 to BillB on Sun Jan 22 08:15:31 2023
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 7:09:13 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Sunday, January 22, 2023 at 6:38:17 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/21/2023 6:20 PM, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ



    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️
    There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.
    You said you were listed ... you are not ... you are a liar. You just admitted you are just an anonymous internet coward.


    ~ No, I said my name is on the rolls of the Law Society of BC. What he checked there (and God only knows why)


    God knows because you're a pathological liar and that knowledge is not exclusive to God alone.




    is simply a list of current dues paying members. I thought you said you were a lawyer back in the Middle Ages? You should understand that. Appearing on the rolls means you were called to the bar in that jurisdiction and have not been disbarred. If I
    wanted to be a current member (which I do not), I could go in and write a test, pay them a bunch of money, and they'd put me on that list riskytard quoted within the week. I can do that because I appear on the rolls of the Law Society. HTH.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to risky biz on Mon Jan 23 09:19:01 2023
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for details. >>>>> To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results

    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed
    there as an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any public database"? How did you determine that without searching every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed
    in yet another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial
    status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BillB@21:1/5 to da pickle on Wed Jan 25 07:31:19 2023
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>
    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on >>>>>> any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got >>>>>>> to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based >>>>>> on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of
    discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls >>>>>> of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for >>>>>> details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society,
    please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an
    organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to
    confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name >>>>>> was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to
    confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself? >>>>>>
    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with
    yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your
    cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an
    attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then >>>>>> took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as >>>>>> an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have
    fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There >>>>>> must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any
    public database"? How did you determine that without searching
    every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet >>>>>> another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on
    "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do
    your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker
    admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally
    bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am
    willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law
    Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a
    lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to
    several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You
    rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully
    informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager
    (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an extremely magnetic personality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Wed Jan 25 09:24:10 2023
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my
    name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet.
    Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on
    any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got >>>>>>> to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based
    on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of
    discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW
    SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF
    WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls >>>>>> of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and
    looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for
    details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society,
    please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an
    organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to
    confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name
    was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to
    confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds
    fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than
    your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with
    yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your
    cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an
    attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then >>>>>> took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as
    an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have
    fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There
    must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any
    public database"? How did you determine that without searching
    every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet
    another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW
    SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF
    WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on
    "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do
    your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker
    admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally
    bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am
    willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law
    Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a
    lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to
    several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You
    rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully
    informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager
    (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.

    One small dodge and he runs again.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to BillB on Wed Jan 25 10:13:26 2023
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>
    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on >>>>>>>> any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got >>>>>>>>> to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based >>>>>>>> on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of
    discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls >>>>>>>> of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for >>>>>>>> details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society,
    please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an
    organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to
    confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name >>>>>>>> was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to
    confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself? >>>>>>>>
    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with >>>>>>>> yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your
    cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an
    attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then >>>>>>>> took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as >>>>>>>> an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have
    fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There >>>>>>>> must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any
    public database"? How did you determine that without searching >>>>>>>> every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet >>>>>>>> another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on
    "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do
    your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker
    admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally >>>> bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am >>>> willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law
    Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a
    lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to >>>> several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You
    rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully
    informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager
    (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an extremely magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so sadly
    ... so so so tragically

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Thu Jan 26 10:06:12 2023
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz
    wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on >>>>>>>>> any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got >>>>>>>>>> to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based >>>>>>>>> on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of >>>>>>>>> discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the rolls >>>>>>>>> of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for >>>>>>>>> details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, >>>>>>>>> please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an
    organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to >>>>>>>>> confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name >>>>>>>>> was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to >>>>>>>>> confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself? >>>>>>>>>
    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with >>>>>>>>> yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your >>>>>>>>> cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an >>>>>>>>> attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine then >>>>>>>>> took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as >>>>>>>>> an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have
    fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There >>>>>>>>> must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any >>>>>>>>> public database"? How did you determine that without searching >>>>>>>>> every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet >>>>>>>>> another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on >>>>>>> "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do >>>>>>> your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker >>>>> admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a totally >>>>> bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation I am >>>>> willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law >>>>> Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a
    lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral support to >>>>> several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You >>>>> rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully
    informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager
    (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an extremely
    magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so sadly
    ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Fri Jan 27 06:44:13 2023
    On 1/26/2023 10:06 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on >>>>>>>>>> any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we got >>>>>>>>>>> to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less based >>>>>>>>>> on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of >>>>>>>>>> discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the >>>>>>>>>> rolls
    of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for >>>>>>>>>> details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, >>>>>>>>>> please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an >>>>>>>>>> organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to >>>>>>>>>> confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name >>>>>>>>>> was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to >>>>>>>>>> confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself? >>>>>>>>>>
    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with >>>>>>>>>> yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your >>>>>>>>>> cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an >>>>>>>>>> attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine >>>>>>>>>> then
    took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed there as >>>>>>>>>> an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have
    fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say "There >>>>>>>>>> must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any >>>>>>>>>> public database"? How did you determine that without searching >>>>>>>>>> every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet >>>>>>>>>> another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on >>>>>>>> "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do >>>>>>>> your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy stalker >>>>>> admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a
    totally
    bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation
    I am
    willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the Law >>>>>> Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a >>>>>> lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral
    support to
    several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. You >>>>>> rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully >>>>>> informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager
    (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an extremely
    magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so sadly
    ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    Starts to running and keeps on ... running

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sat Jan 28 16:27:44 2023
    On 1/27/2023 6:44 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/26/2023 10:06 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an
    attorney on
    any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have we >>>>>>>>>>>> got
    to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less >>>>>>>>>>> based
    on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of >>>>>>>>>>> discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the >>>>>>>>>>> rolls
    of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>>>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name for >>>>>>>>>>> details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, >>>>>>>>>>> please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an >>>>>>>>>>> organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to >>>>>>>>>>> confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your name >>>>>>>>>>> was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to >>>>>>>>>>> confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about yourself? >>>>>>>>>>>
    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>>>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>>>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with >>>>>>>>>>> yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your >>>>>>>>>>> cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an >>>>>>>>>>> attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search engine >>>>>>>>>>> then
    took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed >>>>>>>>>>> there as
    an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have >>>>>>>>>>>> fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say >>>>>>>>>>> "There
    must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any >>>>>>>>>>> public database"? How did you determine that without searching >>>>>>>>>>> every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in yet >>>>>>>>>>> another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on >>>>>>>>> "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do >>>>>>>>> your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy
    stalker
    admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a
    totally
    bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this situation >>>>>>> I am
    willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of the >>>>>>> Law
    Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a >>>>>>> lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal
    relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral
    support to
    several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe Long. >>>>>>> You
    rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully >>>>>>> informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager >>>>>>> (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an
    extremely magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so sadly
    ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    Starts to running and keeps on ... running

    Forever ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Sun Jan 29 11:35:15 2023
    On 1/28/2023 4:27 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/27/2023 6:44 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/26/2023 10:06 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote: >>>>>> On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:20:36 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 4:14:53 PM UTC-8, risky biz >>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 1:26:58 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 11:14:41 AM UTC-8, risky biz >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
    On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 5:16:14 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, January 21, 2023 at 3:06:42 AM UTC-8, BillB >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:

    You continue to lie, stalker boy. You openly declared that my >>>>>>>>>>>>>> name did not appear on ANY public database on the internet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shamed much? LOL
    ~ "There must be a reason why you aren't listed as an
    attorney on
    any public database."

    Caught red-handed lying again. What's the count now? Have >>>>>>>>>>>>> we got
    to 10,000 yet?
    Admittedly, this diversionary maneuver of yours may be less >>>>>>>>>>>> based
    on dishonesty than on your inability to grasp the context of >>>>>>>>>>>> discussion above a third-grade level.

    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️

    This was your claim:
    Blabbermouth: 'I am a lawyer, because my name appears on the >>>>>>>>>>>> rolls
    of the Law Societies of Manitoba and British Columbia.' >>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/WnltLAiBO0M/m/6pkOVnGFBAAJ

    I then posted this after looking up the Law Society of B.C. and >>>>>>>>>>>> looking at their Lawyer Directory:
    'Search Results
    Your search returned 8 result(s). Click on the lawyer's name >>>>>>>>>>>> for
    details.
    To confirm details about a former member of the Law Society, >>>>>>>>>>>> please contact us.

    Show entries
    Search:
    Name
    Alyssa D. Bradley
    Joyce W. Bradley, QC
    Kathleen M. Bradley
    Kimberley Bradley
    L. Allan Bradley
    Melanie M. Bradley
    Michelle Lee Bradley
    Paul D. Bradley
    https://www.lawsociety.bc.ca/lsbc/apps/lkup/mbr-search.cfm#results >>>>>>>>>>>>
    ➡️NO WILLIAM BRADLEY.⬅️


    Me: 'You claimed that you were recognized as a lawyer by an >>>>>>>>>>>> organization and I looked on that website, and only there, to >>>>>>>>>>>> confirm what you said. That took less than 30 seconds. Your >>>>>>>>>>>> name
    was nowhere in evidence there.

    Why do you consider it so unacceptable that someone seeks to >>>>>>>>>>>> confirm something that you're so loudly blabbing about >>>>>>>>>>>> yourself?

    Your attempted explanation of why your name wasn't there sounds >>>>>>>>>>>> fishy. I think that's the source of your discomfort rather than >>>>>>>>>>>> your fantasy about an obsession with you. You're obsessed with >>>>>>>>>>>> yourself. That's always been obvious.'
    https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eloj8EMaATM/m/BrVJKxuvAgAJ


    Me, Jan 17, 2022: 'Searching for days? More evidence of your >>>>>>>>>>>> cognitive disability. You stated where you were listed as an >>>>>>>>>>>> attorney, I found it in about 10 seconds with a search >>>>>>>>>>>> engine then
    took about 1 minute to determine that you weren't listed >>>>>>>>>>>> there as
    an attorney.

    Your '*any legal database*' is yet another lie you have >>>>>>>>>>>>> fabricated on the spot.

    Blabbermouth, Jan 17, 2022: 'Oh, really? So you didn't say >>>>>>>>>>>> "There
    must be a reason why you aren't listed as an attorney on any >>>>>>>>>>>> public database"? How did you determine that without searching >>>>>>>>>>>> every public database? Poor riskytard...caught red-handed in >>>>>>>>>>>> yet
    another bald-faced lie.'


    ➡️NOT LISTED AS AN ATTORNEY ON ANY PUBLIC DATABASE OF THE LAW >>>>>>>>>>>> SOCIETY OF B.C. WHICH IS WHAT WAS BEING DISCUSSED, DUMBSHIT. OF >>>>>>>>>>>> WHICH THERE IS ONLY ONE PUBLIC DATABASE.⬅️
    ~ Hahahahah.... look at him backpedal. He said I didn't appear on >>>>>>>>>> "any public database." The stalker is shamed.


    Wake-up call. Most other people here can read for context. Go do >>>>>>>>>> your crying somewhere else.


    ~ There is no context which saves your inadvertent and clumsy
    stalker
    admission. lolol Don't worry, everyone already knew you have a >>>>>>>> totally
    bizarre obsession with me and my life. And yes, in this
    situation I am
    willing to speak for the whole world.



    Right. I'M the stalker, not you. My towering crime was that I
    confirmed your name did not appear on the Lawyer Directory of
    the Law
    Society of B.C. which called into question your claimed status as a >>>>>>>> lawyer.

    All you did was compile a dossier on Bea's real name, personal >>>>>>>> relationships, her home address and lend enthusiastic moral
    support to
    several people threatening to physically harm her.

    You engaged in similar despicable behavior in regard to Joe
    Long. You
    rooted up information about a foreclosure of his home and gleefully >>>>>>>> informed RGP about it, disparaging him for his supposedly meager >>>>>>>> (which was, most likely, wholly untrue) financial status.

    Does your personal behavior never embarrass you?

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an
    extremely magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so
    sadly ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    Starts to running and keeps on ... running

    Forever ...

    And ever ... Amen

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Mon Jan 30 12:13:09 2023
    On 1/29/2023 11:35 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/28/2023 4:27 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/27/2023 6:44 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/26/2023 10:06 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>> On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an
    extremely magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so
    sadly ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    Starts to running and keeps on ... running

    Forever ...

    And ever ... Amen

    Grave stone

    "Here lies the liar"



    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
    www.avg.com

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From da pickle@21:1/5 to da pickle on Tue Jan 31 10:54:20 2023
    On 1/30/2023 12:13 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/29/2023 11:35 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/28/2023 4:27 PM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/27/2023 6:44 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/26/2023 10:06 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 10:13 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/25/2023 9:31 AM, BillB wrote:
    On Wednesday, January 25, 2023 at 7:24:19 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote: >>>>>>>> On 1/23/2023 9:19 AM, da pickle wrote:
    On 1/22/2023 10:13 AM, risky biz wrote:

    There is a reason he is an anonymous internet coward.

    He is proven to be a dangerous one.

    His lies are running on empty.

    But he will continue, because he has no life.
    One small dodge and he runs again.

    lol.....another one who is obsessed with me. I must have an
    extremely magnetic personality.

    Ah ha ... so quickly ... so predictably ... so obviously ... so
    sadly ... so so so tragically

    Another one bites the dust!

    Starts to running and keeps on ... running

    Forever ...

    And ever ... Amen

    Grave stone

    "Here lies the liar"

    Winner takes all

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)