Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'delusion that you have a high IQ.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent with your
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are excruciatingly dumb.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJa brilliant legal mind!'
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so himself. Such
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First Regiment of
"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:27:23 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:your delusion that you have a high IQ.'
Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent with
dumb. Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are excruciatingly
Such a brilliant legal mind!'https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so himself.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First Regiment of
example you provided was lawful at the time or tested in the courts). We were talking about the present, were we not?"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'Had you taken my advice and researched how the common law changes over time and what it is trumped by then you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself again right now. I offered no opinion on what may or may not have been lawful 150 years ago (or if the
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal forceagainst someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:your delusion that you have a high IQ.'
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:27:23 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent with
dumb. Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are excruciatingly
Such a brilliant legal mind!'https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so himself.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First Regiment of
the example you provided was lawful at the time or tested in the courts). We were talking about the present, were we not?"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'Had you taken my advice and researched how the common law changes over time and what it is trumped by then you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself again right now. I offered no opinion on what may or may not have been lawful 150 years ago (or if
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
against someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal force
You've already lost six ways to Sunday, fool. Would you like some help getting off your back and upright again so you can slowly scuttle away on your cute little clawed feet?
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:19:58 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:your delusion that you have a high IQ.'
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:27:23 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent with
dumb. Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are excruciatingly
Such a brilliant legal mind!'https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so himself.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
of Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First Regiment
the example you provided was lawful at the time or tested in the courts). We were talking about the present, were we not?"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'Had you taken my advice and researched how the common law changes over time and what it is trumped by then you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself again right now. I offered no opinion on what may or may not have been lawful 150 years ago (or if
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
against someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal force
You've already lost six ways to Sunday, fool. Would you like some help getting off your back and upright again so you can slowly scuttle away on your cute little clawed feet?
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:27:23 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:your delusion that you have a high IQ.'
Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent with
dumb. Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are excruciatingly
Such a brilliant legal mind!'https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so himself.
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First Regiment of
"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal forceagainst someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?
~ On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-8, Blabbermouth wrote:against someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?
~ You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal force
Subsequent to the Great Galveston hurricane, to restore public order, Mayor [M-A-Y-O-R] Walter C. Jones declared martial law. Forty-Three civilians tried by court-martial in a military tribunal were convicted, and ordered shot.
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:26:13 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:with your delusion that you have a high IQ.'
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 4:19:58 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 3:49:52 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2023 at 2:27:23 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Blabbermouth, 12/29/22: 'By the way, since when do municipal authorities have the authority to declare martial law? That's news to me.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8XAnuMbPCgAJ
Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'I have a Juris Doctor from a common law jurisdiction and I have been studying Canadian and US comparative law for over 30 years. The fact that you think you know more about common law than I do is entirely consistent
excruciatingly dumb. Municipal authorities do not have the authority to declare martial law in the US, but you are too immature to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about, as usual.'Blabbermouth, 12/30/22: 'So show me and this group the common law decision(s) that support your contention that "municipal authorities" have the authority to declare martial law. I am confident in saying no such common law exists.'
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/YxZm1FcWCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'No, they don't "effectively declare martial law." What a stupid comment. They request it from someone who has the authority, and it is up to the person with that authority to grant the request or not. You are
himself. Such a brilliant legal mind!'https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/eiSUduTpwPc/m/8PmE2i_hCwAJ
Blabbermouth, 1/2/23: 'when the mayor of Bumfuk, USA unilaterally declares martial law, which riskytard claims is well within his or her authority to do. That's what he said, so it must be true! Riskytard has a high IQ, y'know. He said so
https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/_EDzujn2EUw/m/FfU_J2vlCwAJ
Regiment of Chicago Volunteers." Former Lieutenant-Governor William Bross, and part owner of the Tribune, later recollected his response to the arrival of Gen. Sheridan and his soldiers:'The Great Chicago Fire was a conflagration that burned in the American city of Chicago during October 8–10, 1871.
On October 11, 1871, General Philip H. Sheridan came quickly to the aid of the city and was placed in charge by a proclamation, given by mayor Roswell B. Mason:
"The Preservation of the Good Order and Peace of the city is hereby intrusted to Lieut. General P.H. Sheridan, U.S. Army."[9]
To protect the city from looting and violence, the city was put under martial law for two weeks under Gen. Sheridan's command structure with a mix of regular troops, militia units, police, and a specially organized civilian group "First
if the example you provided was lawful at the time or tested in the courts). We were talking about the present, were we not?"Never did deeper emotions of joy overcome me. Thank God, those most dear to me and the city as well are safe."
For two weeks Sheridan's men patrolled the streets, guarded the relief warehouses, and enforced other regulations. On October 24 the troops were relieved of their duties and the volunteers were mustered out of service.'Had you taken my advice and researched how the common law changes over time and what it is trumped by then you wouldn't be making a fool of yourself again right now. I offered no opinion on what may or may not have been lawful 150 years ago (or
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Chicago_Fire
force against someone suspected of theft. Do you now deny that you said my answer to Jerry about the legally permissible course of action in the scenario he asked about would not apply under martial law (which was never declared anyway)?You still haven't explained how a declaration of martial law by the governor of a state suspends a citizen's constitutional rights (save for the narrow exception explicitly mentioned in the Constitution) and makes it permissible to use lethal
In the US a human life is worth more than a pair of Nikes. Jesus, what a scumbag.~ In other words you have nothing. Stop making a fool of yourself. You can't shoot people for just running away from a theft. It is unconstitutional in the US. You should move to North Korea where you are more in synch with the philosophy of governance.You've already lost six ways to Sunday, fool. Would you like some help getting off your back and upright again so you can slowly scuttle away on your cute little clawed feet?
Uh, oh! Trick move. We weren't discussing a declaration of martial law due to the inabilty of a local police force to stop looting and rioting and maintain minimal public order. We were discussing an individual fleeing arrest for a simple theft. Did itthrow anyone? LOL.
BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!
Watch it- BillBlabbermouth backing up!
BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!BEEP!!! BEEP!!! BEEP!!!
Watch it- BillBlabbermouth backing up!
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 715 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 166:40:42 |
| Calls: | 12,096 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 15,003 |
| Messages: | 6,517,808 |