It's about time.turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race. Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary, a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off Chinesefirms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over American
Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS forAmerica Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.
Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers werepreviously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
It's about time..
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race.
Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary…..
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off Chinesefirms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over American
Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS forAmerica Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.
Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers werepreviously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:39:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race..
Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary…..
Oh, Jesus, get over it. Burnie Sanders could NOT have won. And what the hell does that have to do with what your, James Webb was ‘attempting?’ The author of your linked article is Gavin Bade;
“A reporter on the Pro Trade team covering the administration and Congress’ approach to
industrial policy and other trade issues. He previously was on the Pro Energy team covering
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, electricity markets and state policy.
“He was previously senior reporter and editor at Utility Dive, an energy trade publication.
Gavin is a graduate of Georgetown University, where he edited the campus alt-weekly, the Voice.”
.
And what is it you have against “Protect and promote?”
a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over American'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off Chinese
America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS for
previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers were
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
On 12/27/2022 8:39 AM, risky biz wrote:turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
It's about time.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race. Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary, a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over American'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off Chinese
America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS for
previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers were
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
all our problems? Is this a good idea?
If this is the way to go, what are the possible repercussions? We once stayed a few years ahead of China; now we are going to try and put them
out of business?
This is a good thing?
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:29:42 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
On 12/27/2022 8:39 AM, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race. Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary, a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that
firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over American
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off Chinese
America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.
Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS for
previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —
Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers were
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
~ So? Is this going to result in a better world? Is this the solution to
all our problems? Is this a good idea?
The bombing starts in five minutes.
We should build a ton of these and supply them to South Korea, Taiwan, and Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUhgwjmU52M
A world to win.
If this is the way to go, what are the possible repercussions? We once
stayed a few years ahead of China; now we are going to try and put them
out of business?
This is a good thing?
On 12/27/2022 1:23 PM, risky biz wrote:turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:29:42 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/27/2022 8:39 AM, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race. Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary, a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that
Chinese firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off
for America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.
Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS
were previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —
Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
~ So? Is this going to result in a better world? Is this the solution to
all our problems? Is this a good idea?
The bombing starts in five minutes.
We should build a ton of these and supply them to South Korea, Taiwan, and Ukraine.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pUhgwjmU52M
A world to win.?
If this is the way to go, what are the possible repercussions? We once
stayed a few years ahead of China; now we are going to try and put them >> out of business?
This is a good thing?
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 10:26:45 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:39:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race.
Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary…..
.Oh, Jesus, get over it. Burnie Sanders could NOT have won. And what the hell does that have to do with what your, James Webb was ‘attempting?’ The author of your linked article is Gavin Bade;
“A reporter on the Pro Trade team covering the administration and Congress’ approach to
industrial policy and other trade issues. He previously was on the Pro Energy team covering
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, electricity markets and state policy.
“He was previously senior reporter and editor at Utility Dive, an energy trade publication.
Gavin is a graduate of Georgetown University, where he edited the campus alt-weekly, the Voice.”
.
And what is it you have against “Protect and promote?”
What, in the name of God, are you trying to say?
a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
Chinese firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off
for America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS
were previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:17:02 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 10:26:45 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:39:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
.James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race.
Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary…..
Oh, Jesus, get over it. Burnie Sanders could NOT have won. And what the hell does that have to do with what your, James Webb was ‘attempting?’ The author of your linked article is Gavin Bade;
“A reporter on the Pro Trade team covering the administration and Congress’ approach to
industrial policy and other trade issues. He previously was on the Pro Energy team covering
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, electricity markets and state policy.
“He was previously senior reporter and editor at Utility Dive, an energy trade publication.
Gavin is a graduate of Georgetown University, where he edited the campus alt-weekly, the Voice.”
.
.And what is it you have against “Protect and promote?”
What, in the name of God, are you trying to say?
There... Said. You complaining about Biden's bipartisan Chip bill that was passed.
Now what have you against it?
a member of the 'Super Club' whose main claim to fame was 'I killed Ghaddafi'. What a flub that turned out to be. Then the asshole oversaw the transfer of weapons from Libya to al-Qaeda in Syria. Brilliant.
Finally, those careerist slobs seem to have gotten the message. While many Repubicans still take sides with our deadly adversaries.
Chinese firms’ ability to manufacture advanced computer chips. They will soon be followed by an executive order creating new federal authority to regulate U.S. investments in China — the first time the federal government will exert such power over'The new strategy, which the Biden administration internally calls its “protect agenda,” is being rolled out this fall and winter in a series of executive actions. In October, the Commerce Department issued new rules aimed at cutting off
for America Act and Inflation Reduction Act last summer, focused on breaking U.S. reliance on China, and new rules against U.S. companies working with Chinese chipmakers.Those initiatives come on the heels of Biden’s “promote” agenda — using the government to promote American competitiveness. That involved the approval of hundreds of billions of dollars of subsidies for domestic manufacturing in the CHIPS
were previously content to manage China’s technological growth and make sure it stayed a few generations behind the U.S., security officials now seek to bring Beijing’s development – particularly in chips and computing, but soon in other sectors —Taken together, the “protect” and “promote” agendas represent a fundamental rethinking in the American government’s approach to China’s technological advancement and, ultimately, its economic development. While American policymakers
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/12/26/china-trade-tech-00072232
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 12:14:49 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:17:02 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 10:26:45 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:39:15 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
It's about time.
.James Webb attempted to issue the call for this in the 2016 Democratic presidential nominating race.
Instead, the Dem Party piecards anointed Hillary…..
Oh, Jesus, get over it. Burnie Sanders could NOT have won. And what the hell does that have to do with what your, James Webb was ‘attempting?’ The author of your linked article is Gavin Bade;
“A reporter on the Pro Trade team covering the administration and Congress’ approach to
industrial policy and other trade issues. He previously was on the Pro Energy team covering
the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, electricity markets and state policy.
“He was previously senior reporter and editor at Utility Dive, an energy trade publication.
Gavin is a graduate of Georgetown University, where he edited the campus alt-weekly, the Voice.”
.
.And what is it you have against “Protect and promote?”
What, in the name of God, are you trying to say?
~ *** Knew you couldn't answer ***.
.There... Said. You complaining about Biden's bipartisan Chip bill that was passed.
Now what have you against it?
Ask me again after you return from orbit..
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 137:08:57 |
| Calls: | 12,087 |
| Files: | 14,997 |
| Messages: | 6,517,386 |