From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officers to city officials who make police officers scapegoats and stab them in the back at the first squeak from the BLM hustlers- why would ANYONE want that job?


'Though Seattle now offers a $30,000 bonus of its own for officers serving elsewhere who transfer to the city, as well as a $7,500 signing bonus for new recruits, Chief Diaz said recruiting is still proving difficult. New police officers in Seattle earn
about $83,000 annually once they graduate from the academy, while experienced officers transferring earn more than $90,000 a year to start.

A survey of 184 police departments conducted this year by Mr. Wexler’s organization found that resignations were 43 percent higher in 2021 than in 2019, and that retirements were 24 percent higher.

In Minneapolis, where residents rejected a proposal last year to replace their police department, and where police staffing levels have plummeted, the City Council recently approved $7,000 retention payments for officers to stay on the force. In San
Francisco, where job openings abound, police recruiters are finding more success with middle-age applicants looking for a career change. And in Baltimore, Commissioner Michael Harrison said a flight of officers to suburban departments had created a
vicious cycle, with fewer city officers asked to do more work under already difficult conditions.'
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/25/us/police-officer-recruits.html

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 12/26/2022 7:13 AM, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officers to city officials who make police officers scapegoats and stab them in the back at the first squeak from the BLM hustlers- why would ANYONE want that job?

'Though Seattle now offers a $30,000 bonus of its own for officers serving elsewhere who transfer to the city, as well as a $7,500 signing bonus for new recruits, Chief Diaz said recruiting is still proving difficult. New police officers in Seattle

earn about $83,000 annually once they graduate from the academy, while experienced officers transferring earn more than $90,000 a year to start.

A survey of 184 police departments conducted this year by Mr. Wexler’s organization found that resignations were 43 percent higher in 2021 than in 2019, and that retirements were 24 percent higher.

In Minneapolis, where residents rejected a proposal last year to replace their police department, and where police staffing levels have plummeted, the City Council recently approved $7,000 retention payments for officers to stay on the force. In San

Francisco, where job openings abound, police recruiters are finding more success with middle-age applicants looking for a career change. And in Baltimore, Commissioner Michael Harrison said a flight of officers to suburban departments had created a
vicious cycle, with fewer city officers asked to do more work under already difficult conditions.'

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/25/us/police-officer-recruits.html

Indeed, it is a question that goes unanswered.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.
Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 12/27/2022 12:23 AM, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

If shat you say is expressive blabber ... only will logic lead to the conclusion that it is blabber ... and always will be.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.
Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.


Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with the
police.' https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 12/27/2022 8:46 AM, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

Blab runs with a limp from his gross misstatements ... maybe that is not correct ... he is an anonymous internet troll ... we feed him ... I
plead guilty.

Blab on blabber-mouth

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random attack
against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no service
to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty"). Classic projection, again! I didn't defend any murderer, but you
certainly did.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 12/27/2022 9:52 AM, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty"). Classic projection, again! I didn't defend any murderer, but you

certainly did.

Blab on ... switch on ... truth off ... noise on ... Blab out

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:32:53 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:

On 12/27/2022 8:46 AM, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

Blab runs with a limp from his gross misstatements ... maybe that is not correct ... he is an anonymous internet troll ... we feed him ... I
plead guilty.

Blab on blabber-mouth

.

Now THAT'S funny. Our site's "Please respond to me even though I say nothing," troll
calling somebody else a troll. LOL

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF??

.

WTF what? Did he warn them? Did they provoke him?
.

Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring.

.

No, actually there isn't, and you can't show that there is.
So... Who's sleeping?
.

Black people are fighting a war for their lives with the police.'

No, again. Some are fighting arrest. Thus, violating the law.
.

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty"). Classic projection, again! I didn't defend any murderer, but you

certainly did.


Did Blabbermouth just shit his bed? He's going completely spastic over his own words.

Maybe I hould pull investigative cub reporter Bucky Fullminister off the Greene/Boeber catfight beat and have him cover the Blabbermouth meltdown beat.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives with

the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.
.

Classic projection, again! I didn't defend any murderer, but you certainly did.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives

with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.

I didn't admit any such thing and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you. He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades. End of story.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:34:36 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives

with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.

I didn't admit any such thing and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you. He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades. End of story.

Which made you happier- Eric Chauvin being railroaded by that kangaroo court or those two police officers being maimed by some cowardly scumbag criminal who the previous week had murdered someone whose car he hijacked? Was he fighting a war for his life
with that car owner? Are you going to want to know if the car owner was black or white?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:48:08 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:34:36 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making

excuses. Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from
their perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their

lives with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.

I didn't admit any such thing and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you. He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades. End of story.

Which made you happier- Eric Chauvin being railroaded by that kangaroo court or those two police officers being maimed by some cowardly scumbag criminal who the previous week had murdered someone whose car he hijacked? Was he fighting a war for his

life with that car owner? Are you going to want to know if the car owner was black or white?

I have never expressed any happiness or approval of anyone being the victim of random violence, and Derek Chauvin was not convicted by a "kangaroo court". The evidence against him was irrefutable which is why I was able to guarantee (long before the
trial began) that he would be convicted of second degree murder. If you watched the post-trial interview with the jurors you would know that it was not even a remotely close call. Had you watched the trial you would realize how futile his defense was. He
had ZERO chance of success based on the evidence presented.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 12:03:04 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:48:08 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:34:36 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making

excuses. Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from
their perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their

lives with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this

random attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You
do no service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.

I didn't admit any such thing and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you. He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades. End of story.

Which made you happier- Eric Chauvin being railroaded by that kangaroo court or those two police officers being maimed by some cowardly scumbag criminal who the previous week had murdered someone whose car he hijacked? Was he fighting a war for his

life with that car owner? Are you going to want to know if the car owner was black or white?


~ I have never expressed any happiness or approval of anyone being the victim of random violence,


You could have fooled me.


~ and Derek Chauvin was not convicted by a "kangaroo court". The evidence against him was irrefutable which is why I was able to guarantee (long before the trial began) that he would be convicted of second degree murder. If you watched the post-trial
interview with the jurors you would know that it was not even a remotely close call. Had you watched the trial you would realize how futile his defense was. He had ZERO chance of success based on the evidence presented.


Um, hmmm ... witness tampering, city officials lying under oath, 'expert' witnesses lying under oath. No problem in Blabbermouth's update to 1930s Alabama.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 12:03:04 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:48:08 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:34:36 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making

excuses. Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from
their perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their

lives with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this

random attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You
do no service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense. And you've yet to admit you
misread that video.

I didn't admit any such thing and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you. He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades. End of story.

Which made you happier- Eric Chauvin being railroaded by that kangaroo court or those two police officers being maimed by some cowardly scumbag criminal who the previous week had murdered someone whose car he hijacked? Was he fighting a war for his

life with that car owner? Are you going to want to know if the car owner was black or white?
.

I have never expressed any happiness or approval of anyone being the victim of random violence,

Sure you did. You thought you predicted Derek Chauvin’s demise by misreading a video.

… and Derek Chauvin was not convicted by a "kangaroo court". The evidence against him was irrefutable

So why can’t you argue it? They did in court, successfully. Yet you still can’t address how wrong you were
when you misread that tape.

which is why I was able to guarantee (long before the trial began) that he would be convicted of second
degree murder.

No, you could not, because your misreading of the tape was proven in court to be a misread.

If you watched the post-trial interview with the jurors you would know that it was not even a
remotely close call. Had you watched the trial you would realize how futile his defense was.

Wrong yet again. I watched it. It was how I was able to show your misread of the tape.
.

He had ZERO chance of success based on the evidence presented.

And ANOTHER wrong. There are a series of points in the appeal. A few of which you
STILL can’t address.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:34:36 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 11:24:25 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 7:52:33 AM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 6:46:38 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 10:23:21 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:

On Monday, December 26, 2022 at 5:13:27 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:

From scumbags like Blabbermouth fashioning excuses for black criminals murdering police officer

~ There is no excuse for murder, by definition, so you aren't making any sense (as usual). Murder with an excuse is not murder. Expressing someone's motive for murder (or any other criminal act), or a theory on their motive, is not making excuses.

Detectives and lawyers do it every day in forming a theory of the case. If I say Southerners fought the Civil War to fight tyranny and preserve slavery, that does not mean I am making an excuse for slavery. I am simply expressing the motive from their
perspective. I know....logic can be confusing for the uninitiated. If you keep practicing you will get better...to an extent.

Uh, huh .. you certainly make a lot of 'sense'. LOL. Yuck.

BillBlabbermouth commented on a black criminal that surreptitiously approached two police officers from behind and attempted to murder them with a handgun but only succeeded in horribly maiming them both with headshots:
'I saw the story on Fox News.com They said the shooter acted "without warning or provocation". I was like...WTF?? Have you people been asleep for the last two months? There is a genocide occurring. Black people are fighting a war for their lives

with the police.'

https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/Zfiue-aH2TQ/m/qLVZKMjuBAAJ

.

I showed you several videos of BLM leaders and their followers publicly declaring war on the police for genocide against black people. My post was about Fox News pretending they just could not fathom what could have possibly motivated this random

attack against police in the midst of a nationwide backlash and a declaration of war against police, as if there are no foreseeable consequences to the police from the actions of murderers like Derek Chauvin and all those who came before him. You do no
service to police by pretending you are surprised when there is random retaliation for these abominations.

The irony here is that it was YOU who spent a year or more trying to defend the convicted murderer, not me (a murder deemed by the court to have been committed with "particular cruelty").

.

It was defended. It's just that YOU couldn't argue that defense.

And apparently still can’t..

And you've yet to admit you misread that video.

.

I didn't admit any such thing

That’s what I just said. Hello?

… and I am done arguing about Chauvin with you.

Because, as we’ve just pointed out, you can’t. You misread the video and I proved it.
Yet you're ego prevents you from admitting you misread it.

He confessed to everything and he's gone away to prison for a couple of decades.

.

Of course he did. Even us other non-lawyers know why he did that. But he still have documented evidence
showing Floyd was still alive when he lifted his knee off Floyd’s BACK (not neck). And YOU still can’t
address your misread of that video.

End of story.

We know. Keep running…

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Tuesday, December 27, 2022 at 12:23:00 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:

I didn't admit any such thing

That’s what I just said. Hello?

Sorry, I misread what you wrote.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)