Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.overall, according to a new analysis.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age group
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or PacificIslanders, the investigators said.'
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes..
Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test..
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age groupoverall, according to a new analysis.
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or PacificIslanders, the investigators said.'
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662.
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities…
… in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksThat's my line: https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/n62V7BGOMyg/m/JT6oDVuuBAAJ
Splashie
Jun 11, 2020, 10:55:38 AM
to
Guns don't kill people. Bullets fired from guns kill people.
Michael
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bks
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bks
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:.
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes..
Yea, actually cars CAN cause traffic fatalities. If you have no cars, you have no traffic fatalities.
And guns CAN cause gun crimes because if you don’t have guns, you can’t have gun crimes.
.
Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test..
Who’s “Gun-grabber?”
And no, actually, it wasn’t a test. It’s an illogical statement. Now see if you.
can address it now that’s it’s explained. Or, admit you ‘fail’ this simple ‘test.’
group overall, according to a new analysis.'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities….
Wait a minute. How can you have a firearm-related fatality if firearms don’t cause them?
.
.
… in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?.
(Gun nuts are weird people....)
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 7:59:31 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes..
Yea, actually cars CAN cause traffic fatalities. If you have no cars, you have no traffic fatalities.
And guns CAN cause gun crimes because if you don’t have guns, you can’t have gun crimes.
.
Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test..
Who’s “Gun-grabber?”.
*** No Reply Noted ***
.
And no, actually, it wasn’t a test. It’s an illogical statement. Now see if you.
can address it now that’s it’s explained. Or, admit you ‘fail’ this simple ‘test.’
*** No Reply Noted ***
.
And so it goes through the rest of my unanswered, unaddressed reply.
.
Really, Risky, are you that far down the NRA rabbit hole?.
.
*** No Reply Expected***
.
.
.
group overall, according to a new analysis.'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities….
Wait a minute. How can you have a firearm-related fatality if firearms don’t cause them?
.
.
… in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?.
(Gun nuts are weird people....)
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:age group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
~ I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
You ran away in full flight immediately trying to change the subject to the Fentanyl irrelevancy..
There are 400 million guns in America. IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE ...
What you and your 'liberal' support drones..
… are running away from is that the primary cause of gun violence in America is a social and moral breakdown. And it's a social and moral breakdown that is encouraged by people like you who portray and excuse criminals as engaged in a legitimate 'war'. As always, you don't give a shit about the black people in America who are victims of your 'soldiers' and who want more police in their communities, not less. The death sentence for gun murders and incarcerating otherwise violent criminals for life is
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.~ It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does floodingThe overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
In a single year, law enforcement seized enough illegal Fentanyl in this country to kill every American. We'll have to imagine the small percentage those seizures represent of the total illegal Fentanyl circulating. The illegal Fentanyl circulatingwill surely DWARF legally prescribed Fentanyl. For all intents and purposes, Fentanyl is a drug whose intended purpose is its illegal use.
Guns are exactly the opposite. Your 'countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes' is nothing more than a laughably weak rhetorical flourish.
~ We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would beinteresting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
The logic problem is this:are owned by whites yet the greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.'
'IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE. That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An overwhelming percentage of the guns in America
That's the obvious fact you're fleeing from.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 7:59:31 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes..
Yea, actually cars CAN cause traffic fatalities. If you have no cars, you have no traffic fatalities.
And guns CAN cause gun crimes because if you don’t have guns, you can’t have gun crimes.
.
Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test..
Who’s “Gun-grabber?”.
*** No Reply Noted ***
..
And no, actually, it wasn’t a test. It’s an illogical statement. Now see if you.
can address it now that’s it’s explained. Or, admit you ‘fail’ this simple ‘test.’
*** No Reply Noted ***
.
.And so it goes through the rest of my unanswered, unaddressed reply.
.
Really, Risky, are you that far down the NRA rabbit hole?.
.
*** No Reply Expected***
.
.
.
group overall, according to a new analysis.'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities….
Wait a minute. How can you have a firearm-related fatality if firearms don’t cause them?
.
.
… in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?.
(Gun nuts are weird people....)
There are still 400 million guns in America..
IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE. That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An overwhelming percentage of the guns in Americaare owned by whites yet the greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.
*** No Reply From Gun Nuts Noted ***.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksI know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking you to
_____________________
Michael
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does flooding
We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would beinteresting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
~ I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.
You ran away in full flight immediately trying to change the subject to the Fentanyl irrelevancy.overwhelming percentage of the guns in America are owned by whites yet the greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.
There are 400 million guns in America. IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE. That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An
What you and your 'liberal' support drones are running away from is that the primary cause of gun violence in America is a social and moral breakdown. And it's a social and moral breakdown that is encouraged by people like you who portray and excusecriminals as engaged in a legitimate 'war'. As always, you don't give a shit about the black people in America who are victims of your 'soldiers' and who want more police in their communities, not less. The death sentence for gun murders and
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
~ It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does floodingthe country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.
In a single year, law enforcement seized enough illegal Fentanyl in this country to kill every American. We'll have to imagine the small percentage those seizures represent of the total illegal Fentanyl circulating. The illegal Fentanyl circulatingwill surely DWARF legally prescribed Fentanyl. For all intents and purposes, Fentanyl is a drug whose intended purpose is its illegal use.
Guns are exactly the opposite. Your 'countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes' is nothing more than a laughably weak rhetorical flourish.
~ We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would beinteresting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
The logic problem is this:are owned by whites yet the greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.'
'IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE. That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An overwhelming percentage of the guns in America
That's the obvious fact you're fleeing from.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does flooding
The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
interesting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would be
BBC
US seizes enough fentanyl in 2022 to kill every American
Yesterday
New York Post
DEA seized enough fentanyl doses to kill every American in 2022
6 hours ago
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:age group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does flooding
interesting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would be
US seizes enough fentanyl in 2022 to kill every American
Yesterday
New York Post
DEA seized enough fentanyl doses to kill every American in 2022
6 hours ago
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does flooding
The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
interesting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would be
BBC
US seizes enough fentanyl in 2022 to kill every American
Yesterday
New York Post
DEA seized enough fentanyl doses to kill every American in 2022
6 hours ago
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:age group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does flooding
interesting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would be
US seizes enough fentanyl in 2022 to kill every American
Yesterday
New York Post
DEA seized enough fentanyl doses to kill every American in 2022
6 hours ago
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking you to
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 12:23:59 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 12:19:39 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 7:59:31 AM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:.
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes..
Yea, actually cars CAN cause traffic fatalities. If you have no cars, you have no traffic fatalities.
And guns CAN cause gun crimes because if you don’t have guns, you can’t have gun crimes.
.
Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test..
Who’s “Gun-grabber?”
*** No Reply Noted ***
.
********** STILL No Reply Noted *******
.
.
.
..
And no, actually, it wasn’t a test. It’s an illogical statement. Now see if you.
can address it now that’s it’s explained. Or, admit you ‘fail’ this simple ‘test.’
*** No Reply Noted ***
.
.
.
********** STILL No Reply Noted *******
.
.
.
.And so it goes through the rest of my unanswered, unaddressed reply.
.
Really, Risky, are you that far down the NRA rabbit hole?.
.
*** No Reply Expected***
.
********** And None Received *******
.
.
.
.
.
.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that age
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'
The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
are owned by whites yet the greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662.
How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities…
Wait a minute. How can you have a firearm-related fatality if firearms don’t cause them?
.
.
… in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?.
(Gun nuts are weird people....)
.
There are still 400 million guns in America..
Yea, so? Does that keep you from replying, responding or showing?
.
.
IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE. That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An overwhelming percentage of the guns in America
.
*** No Reply From Gun Nuts Noted ***
Yea, that’s what I keep showing…..
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking you
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking youGuns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
~ He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
Don't pressure him. I think he can get it given enough time.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:age group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that
Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian or
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
~ I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.
You ran away in full flight immediately trying to change the subject to the Fentanyl irrelevancy.
There are 400 million guns in America. IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE.
That obvious correlation is plain as day. The facts are just the opposite. An overwhelming percentage of the guns in America are owned by whites yet the >greatest rate of gun violence is in the black community.
What you and your 'liberal' support drones are running away from is that the primary cause of gun violence in America is a social and moral breakdown.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.~ It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does floodingThe overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.
In a single year, law enforcement seized enough illegal Fentanyl in this country to kill every American. We'll have to imagine the small percentage those seizures represent of the total illegal Fentanyl circulating. The illegal Fentanyl circulatingwill surely DWARF legally prescribed Fentanyl. For all intents and purposes, Fentanyl is a drug whose intended purpose is its illegal use.
Guns are exactly the opposite. Your 'countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes' is nothing more than a laughably weak rhetorical flourish.
~ We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would beinteresting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.
The logic problem is this:
'IF GUNS ARE THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF GUN VIOLENCE THEN ALL AMERICAN ETHNIC GROUPS WOULD EXPERIENCE SIMILAR LEVELS OF GUN VIOLENCE.
That's the obvious fact you're fleeing from.
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 6:25:55 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:age group overall, according to a new analysis.
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 2:30:01 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:45:18 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 1:20:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Tuesday, December 20, 2022 at 12:59:41 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
Cars don't cause traffic fatalities and guns don't cause gun crimes. Gun-grabbers fail this simple IQ test.
'Dec 20 (Reuters) - The increase in firearm-related fatalities among U.S. youth has taken a disproportionate toll in the Black community, which accounted for 47% of gun deaths among children and teens in 2020 despite representing 15% of that
or Pacific Islanders, the investigators said.'The rate of firearm-related deaths per 100,000 U.S. kids in 2020 was 5.2 overall. But it was much higher for Blacks at 17.4 per 100,000, and 9.1 among Native Americans. The rate was 4.01 for Hispanics, 3.4 among whites, and 1.32 among Asian
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/article-abstract/2799662
~ Looks to be about 16 times higher in awash-with-guns America. What's your point?How different is the rate of firearm-related fatalities in gun-free Japan from firearm-related fatalities among Asian or Pacific Islanders in awash-with-guns America?
Then using your assertion (which is always suspect) it's about 210 times higher among black youths.
You ran away from addressing the difference which completely invalidates the guns-cause-gun-crime argument.I didn't "run away" from anything. You asked a question and I answered it. It clearly wasn't the answer you were looking for, because it ran diametrically opposed to your hypothesis.
~ Does fentanyl cause drug overdoses? If not, why is it such a focus of attention?
flooding the country with fentanyl cause more fentanyl overdoses? Yes or no? Try not to dodge this time. Face questions head-on like I do. Otherwise it make it look like you have been defeated yet again.The overwhelming majority of guns are purchased legally for legal purposes. That isn't true of Fentanyl. This is another example of your flood-the-zone-with-shit style of troll.It's an irrelevant distinction. The existence of 400 million guns makes it very easy to buy or steal guns for illegal purposes, and countless legal purchased guns are used by the purchasers or someone close to them for illegal purposes. Does
interesting to see what shape you come up with, given your paucity of logic skills.We know how much gun death there is in the US with 400 million guns flooding the country. We also know that there would be zero gun deaths if there were zero guns in the country. So fill in the middle of that graph for me and show it. It would be
~ BBC
US seizes enough fentanyl in 2022 to kill every American
Yesterday
New York Post
DEA seized enough fentanyl doses to kill every American in 2022https://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/633288962500003800b8dae7.png?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale&format=webp
6 hours ago
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking you
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words "primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking youGuns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
Michael
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking youOn Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words >> "primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert object at all.
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking youOn Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
Look up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shootHe splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words >>>> "primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
Michael
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible? An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer: Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was askingOn Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert object at all.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer: Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was asking
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in >> death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence..
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in >> death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
bringing one inside? After all, ‘Guns don’t kill people.’You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
If an excess of guns aren’t the problem, why do they block us all from taking one aboard a flight? Why can’t I take mine to a local hockey game? Why are our local sport venues preventing you from bringing one inside? Why does city hall keep me from
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.
--bksThat's my line: https://groups.google.com/g/rec.gambling.poker/c/n62V7BGOMyg/m/JT6oDVuuBAAJ
Splashie
Jun 11, 2020, 10:55:38 AM
to
Guns don't kill people. Bullets fired from guns kill people.
Michael
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in >> death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:54:21 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
from bringing one inside? After all, ‘Guns don’t kill people.’You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
If an excess of guns aren’t the problem, why do they block us all from taking one aboard a flight? Why can’t I take mine to a local hockey game? Why are our local sport venues preventing you from bringing one inside? Why does city hall keep me
Fentanyl is murder.
On 12/22/2022 5:36 PM, Splashie wrote:you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote: >>>> On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was askingOn Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
Look up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shootHe splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in >>>> death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
Michael
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute >> knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert >> object at all.
Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible? An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
MichaelTry to understand that "who" and "what" are both involved in your
schedule. Who killed and what killed whatever you want in your list are
both involved.
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 5:44:49 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On 12/22/2022 5:36 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote: >>>>>> On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote: >>>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was askingOn Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
hence the need for licensing and regulation), they do so without killing anyone. Electricity, as used by humans, is designed to power devices that illuminate our homes, entertain us, and allow us to communicate with each other on Usenet and elsewhere inTry to understand that "who" and "what" are both involved in yourLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shootHe splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words >>>>>> "primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in >>>>>> death even when they are involved in an "accident".
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
Michael
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute >>>> knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert >>>> object at all.
Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible? An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
schedule. Who killed and what killed whatever you want in your list are
both involved.
Who is not involved at all. The question is about the design and intended use of the inanimate objects. With that in mind, the correct answer is obviously C. Cars are designed to transport people from point A to point B, and if operated correctly (
Guns OTOH are literally designed for the express purpose of killing people (and other animals) efficiently with little risk to the one doing the killing. If operated correctly for their intended purpose (not necessarily legally, but correctly) theykill.other human beings. For all you gun fetishists that like to imagine that their noble purpose is purely for self-defense - what good would they be as self-defense if they WEREN'T able to quickly kill someone threatening your life or property?
Michael
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:54:21 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
from bringing one inside? After all, ‘Guns don’t kill people.’You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
~ If an excess of guns aren’t the problem, why do they block us all from taking one aboard a flight? Why can’t I take mine to a local hockey game? Why are our local sport venues preventing you from bringing one inside? Why does city hall keep me
Because people kill people. Duh..
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:58:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:54:21 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I was
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people.I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
from bringing one inside? After all, ‘Guns don’t kill people.’You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
If an excess of guns aren’t the problem, why do they block us all from taking one aboard a flight? Why can’t I take mine to a local hockey game? Why are our local sport venues preventing you from bringing one inside? Why does city hall keep me
~ Nor does fentanyl, apparently. Inanimate object.
And the obvious way to reduce the improper use of fentanyl, which is exactly how it is PRIMARILY.
used, is to increase the penalties for improper use.
That's exactly why using a gun to kill an innocent person is treated differently from using a gun in self-defense. Fentanyl is murder.
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 3:49:42 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:was asking you to clarify whether that indeed was your response to the multiple choice question I asked. If your answer is not D), then here's your second opportunity to clarify:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:58:11 PM UTC-8, BillB wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:54:21 PM UTC-8, VegasJerry wrote:
On Friday, December 23, 2022 at 12:29:27 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 3:36:33 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 2:04:38 PM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/22/2022 1:45 PM, Splashie wrote:
On Thursday, December 22, 2022 at 10:14:02 AM UTC-8, da pickle wrote:
On 12/21/2022 8:21 PM, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 2:55:46 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:48:28 PM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 1:00:54 PM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:You answered D) All of the above to the question "Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?" when "all of the above" includes cars and electricity (and guns). And I'm not lying, I
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:49:48 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:44:38 AM UTC-8, Splashie wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 11:32:07 AM UTC-8, risky biz wrote:
On Wednesday, December 21, 2022 at 8:00:31 AM UTC-8, Bradley K. Sherman wrote:
Guns don't kill people, bullets kill people. >>>>>>>>>>I know you are suffering from terminal 'liberalism' but wake-up call - - guns don't have a magical power that makes their owner want to commit murder, nor do cars, or electricity. DUH.
--bks
~ Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
Michael
~ You're seriously answering D? That is, you believe the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people and that they do so when used correctly?D) All of the above
LOL. A classic 'splashy' 'DUH!'.
Michael
You seriously fashioned a shit-stupid argument and now you're trying to salvage it by lying? Where did I say that the primary purpose of cars and electricity is to kill people? Go ahead- put your money where your mouth is.
He splashed out, risky ... he has a distorted understanding of the words
_____________________
Michael
I'll give you a chance to try to figure out why my answer was correct to this question of yours:
'Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?'
I'll give you three days. I don't want to rush you.
"primary purpose" and fact that cars definitely result sometimes in
death even when they are involved in an "accident".
We may not hear from him again on this one.
If an accident happens, the car was not used correctly, was it?
~ Who the fuck said the inanimate object was responsible?MichaelLook up the word "accident" ... just because you accidentally shoot
yourself in the foot does not make the GUN responsible ... or substitute
knife or stairs or curb ... or snowbank or most anything else any inert
object at all.
Then why are you going spastic because I said an inanimate object was not responsible?
~ An accident is generally caused by operator error. The bullet fired into my foot caused the injury, but under that scenario I would be responsible.
me from bringing one inside? After all, ‘Guns don’t kill people.’You have to either admit that you agree with what I'm asserting or admit that you're too dense to understand your own question. I thought you could get it if you thought about it more but I may have overestimated your intelligence.
It was a very simple question. Let me repeat it for you and get your answer:
Which of the following things, when used correctly and for their primary purpose, kill people?
A) Cars
B) Electricity
C) Guns
D) All of the above
E) None of the above
.Michael
If an excess of guns aren’t the problem, why do they block us all from taking one aboard a flight? Why can’t I take mine to a local hockey game? Why are our local sport venues preventing you from bringing one inside? Why does city hall keep
~ Nor does fentanyl, apparently. Inanimate object.
.Buy polka dot shroom bars
And the obvious way to reduce the improper use of fentanyl, which is exactly how it is PRIMARILY.
used, is to increase the penalties for improper use.
LOL!
How'd that work for guns and all the dead in the Las Vegas Shooting?
How's that work for all the dead kids in school shootings?
Yea, them kid killers were sure worried about the penalty....
.
.
.
That's exactly why using a gun to kill an innocent person is treated differently from using a gun in self-defense. Fentanyl is murder.
~ On Saturday, January 7, 2023 at 4:53:57 PM UTC-8, Daffo Dils wrote:
~ This mushroom chocolate bar has a sweet taste due to a whopping 17 grams of sugar and 6 grams of sugar that is present in the chocolate bar.
That much sugar is going to kill your daffy ass. Why the hell would anyone want to die of a sugar overdose while they're high on psilocybin?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 714 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 135:00:08 |
| Calls: | 12,087 |
| Files: | 14,997 |
| Messages: | 6,517,357 |
