• Re: this is actually pretty interesting

    From Ed P@21:1/5 to Tahitian pearl on Tue Feb 18 23:58:10 2025
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking- methods/index.html


    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time,
    pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely. Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted.
    Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot. The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit different.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham@21:1/5 to Ed P on Tue Feb 18 22:05:21 2025
    On 2025-02-18 9:58 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html


    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time, pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely.  Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted. Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them  Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot.  The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit different.

    But do you split them at the big end or the small end?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cindy Hamilton@21:1/5 to Ed P on Wed Feb 19 10:18:41 2025
    On 2025-02-19, Ed P <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html


    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    Nobody does. I'm not even sure the eggs are perfectly cooked. One
    of the food writers for the Washington Post tried it and found the
    whites turn out softer than she likes.

    I don't do soft-boiled eggs, but I've been simmering eggs for 11 minutes
    and get a nice, very slightly undercooked yolk. This is good for
    slicing onto a salad. I let them go a little longer if I want to make
    deviled eggs.

    --
    Cindy Hamilton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Janet@21:1/5 to All on Wed Feb 19 12:48:52 2025
    In article <67b56691$6$15$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    On 2025-02-18 9:58 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html


    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time, pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely.� Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted. Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them� Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot.� The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit different.

    But do you split them at the big end or the small end?

    Politics again. It's a small world.

    Janet UK

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Graham@21:1/5 to Janet on Wed Feb 19 06:06:43 2025
    On 2025-02-19 5:48 a.m., Janet wrote:
    In article <67b56691$6$15$[email protected]>,
    [email protected] says...

    On 2025-02-18 9:58 p.m., Ed P wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html


    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time? >>>
    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time, >>> pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely.  Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted. >>> Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them  Crack shell with >>> a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot.  The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit
    different.

    But do you split them at the big end or the small end?

    Politics again. It's a small world.

    Janet UK


    Swiftian, in fact:-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From [email protected]@21:1/5 to Ed P on Wed Feb 19 13:40:31 2025
    On 2025-02-19, Ed P <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html

    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time, pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely. Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted. Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot. The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit different.

    my method is i never make hard boiled eggs and they always come
    out perfect. my wife always makes them and she uses a color changing
    egg timer. peels them while still warm. i, on the other hand, always
    make the fried, scrambled, and omelets.

    --
    SDF Public Access UNIX System - https://sdf.org

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dsi1@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Feb 19 15:05:57 2025
    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 13:40:31 +0000, [email protected] wrote:

    On 2025-02-19, Ed P <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2/18/2025 10:22 PM, Tahitian pearl wrote:
    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-
    methods/index.html

    interesting, but do you really want to fuss with all of that every time?

    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time,
    pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely. Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted.
    Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot. The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit
    different.

    my method is i never make hard boiled eggs and they always come
    out perfect. my wife always makes them and she uses a color changing
    egg timer. peels them while still warm. i, on the other hand, always
    make the fried, scrambled, and omelets.

    I have one of those cute color changing thingies. These days, I'll boil
    eggs using my phone as a timer and an ice bath. It's hardly as cute/fun
    though.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/ju53FXRnfrhZ7zMP9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ed P@21:1/5 to BryanGSimmons on Wed Feb 19 09:40:52 2025
    On 2/19/2025 7:55 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:


    This is a nice page.
    https://www.seriouseats.com/sous-vide-101-all-about-eggs
    160F looks like the sweet spot.


    But you need a piece of equipment to hold the temperature and with setup
    and cooking time, about an hour.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Cindy Hamilton@21:1/5 to Ed P on Wed Feb 19 15:17:27 2025
    On 2025-02-19, Ed P <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2/19/2025 7:55 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:


    This is a nice page.
    https://www.seriouseats.com/sous-vide-101-all-about-eggs
    160F looks like the sweet spot.


    But you need a piece of equipment to hold the temperature and with setup
    and cooking time, about an hour.

    I already have the equipment. If I wanted to sous vide eggs, I
    could just plan ahead (since I don't eat boiled eggs for breakfast).

    Seems silly to break out the sous vide when I usually cook only 4 or
    sometimes 6 eggs.

    --
    Cindy Hamilton

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bruce@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Feb 20 03:56:56 2025
    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 09:22:14 -0600, BryanGSimmons
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2/19/2025 9:17 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
    On 2025-02-19, Ed P <[email protected]> wrote:
    On 2/19/2025 7:55 AM, BryanGSimmons wrote:

    >
    This is a nice page.
    https://www.seriouseats.com/sous-vide-101-all-about-eggs
    160F looks like the sweet spot.


    But you need a piece of equipment to hold the temperature and with setup >>> and cooking time, about an hour.

    I already have the equipment. If I wanted to sous vide eggs, I
    could just plan ahead (since I don't eat boiled eggs for breakfast).

    Seems silly to break out the sous vide when I usually cook only 4 or
    sometimes 6 eggs.

    But you can get them perfect every time. Life is too short for the
    mediocre food most folks here are OK with.

    Says the man who buys nearly rotting fish because it's cheap.

    --
    Bruce
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zf7JhPvB/the-lord-of-the-rings.jpg>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Gerald@21:1/5 to BryanGSimmons on Wed Feb 19 14:46:33 2025
    BryanGSimmons wrote:
      Life is too short for the mediocre food most folks here are OK with.


    https://postimg.cc/rdX5J8g1

    Obviously.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From songbird@21:1/5 to Ed P on Wed Feb 19 23:08:41 2025
    Ed P wrote:
    ...
    I have my own method that works for me. I make 4 X-large eggs at a time, pretty much out of the fridge.

    Small pot holds 4 eggs nicely. Fill enough to cover eggs when inserted. Bring to a rolling boil, insert the four eggs.
    Boil six minutes, remove from heat
    Take two eggs, run under water so you can handle them Crack shell with
    a knife, split open and you have nice soft boiled eggs.

    Leave the other two sit in the pot. The next day you have nice hard
    boiled eggs.

    Try it one time, adjust in 30 second increments if you want them a bit different.

    if needed adjust for altitude.

    in recent times we've not been doing many boiled eggs
    but before this era we were boiling up to 18 eggs at a
    time and unfortunately it has never been consistently
    done to a degree i find useful. the most recent time i
    made a bad mistake and some were undercooked and it was
    horrible to peel them.

    because i am not the primary cook and only help out my
    suggestions for using timers and set temperatures or
    other ways of trying to get more consistency are pretty
    much ignored or discouraged because she doesn't want to
    think about it.

    glad to say we're not doing many eggs now with them
    being expensive. what eggs we're doing are cracking
    a few in a bowl and covering it and then microwaving
    until desired level of done is accomplished. not a
    thing i do at all. i'll pan fry them in butter if i
    want an egg sandwich or sunny side up for toast any
    other way is simply scrambled and that works fine in
    the microwave for me (a little runny in the center is
    ok as they will cook to done enough for me when i
    stir them).


    songbird

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From songbird@21:1/5 to Graham on Wed Feb 19 23:09:36 2025
    Graham wrote:
    On 2025-02-19 5:48 a.m., Janet wrote:
    ...
    Politics again. It's a small world.

    Janet UK


    Swiftian, in fact:-)

    fat bottomed eggs just make the rockin' world go round!


    songbird

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dsi1@21:1/5 to Tahitian pearl on Tue Feb 25 20:45:46 2025
    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 3:22:37 +0000, Tahitian pearl wrote:

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-methods/index.html

    My granddaughter found an egg on the ground at school and bought it
    home. It's most likely a chicken egg. We took a look at it by shining a
    light through the egg but there was nothing there. The idea of no yolk
    in an egg is pretty exciting.

    It seems that you can't use your cell phone light to spec out an egg -
    the point source is too small so the yolk is projected on the entire
    wall of the egg and the egg appears to have no yolk. Well, that's my
    theory anyway. The egg was cracked open and it was an ordinary egg - so
    I fried it up. I could tell that the chicken was a happy critter and
    living a clean, stress-free, life in the school yard. The egg,
    unfortunately, had a pretty tragic existence.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/YZB9CVwFEzihgEhB6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From gm@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 20:58:04 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 20:45:46 +0000, dsi1 wrote:

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 3:22:37 +0000, Tahitian pearl wrote:

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-methods/index.html

    My granddaughter found an egg on the ground at school and bought it
    home. It's most likely a chicken egg. We took a look at it by shining a
    light through the egg but there was nothing there. The idea of no yolk
    in an egg is pretty exciting.

    It seems that you can't use your cell phone light to spec out an egg -
    the point source is too small so the yolk is projected on the entire
    wall of the egg and the egg appears to have no yolk. Well, that's my
    theory anyway. The egg was cracked open and it was an ordinary egg - so
    I fried it up. I could tell that the chicken was a happy critter and
    living a clean, stress-free, life in the school yard. The egg,
    unfortunately, had a pretty tragic existence.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/YZB9CVwFEzihgEhB6


    How do you know it's not some kinda WIERD "alien" egg...???

    Like in "Invasion of the CLUCKER Snatchers"...!!!

    👽 🐸 🤖 🐔

    --
    GM

    --

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Janet@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 25 21:26:47 2025
    In article
    <[email protected]>, dsi100
    @yahoo.com says...

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 3:22:37 +0000, Tahitian pearl wrote:

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-methods/index.html

    My granddaughter found an egg on the ground at school and bought it
    home. It's most likely a chicken egg. We took a look at it by shining a
    light through the egg but there was nothing there. The idea of no yolk
    in an egg is pretty exciting.

    When "candling" an egg (shining a light through it) you
    would only "see something" if and when the fertilised egg
    starts developing an embryo chicken.

    Janet UK




    It seems that you can't use your cell phone light to spec out an egg -
    the point source is too small so the yolk is projected on the entire
    wall of the egg and the egg appears to have no yolk. Well, that's my
    theory anyway. The egg was cracked open and it was an ordinary egg - so
    I fried it up. I could tell that the chicken was a happy critter and
    living a clean, stress-free, life in the school yard. The egg,
    unfortunately, had a pretty tragic existence.

    https://photos.app.goo.gl/YZB9CVwFEzihgEhB6

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From dsi1@21:1/5 to Janet on Tue Feb 25 22:05:34 2025
    On Tue, 25 Feb 2025 21:26:47 +0000, Janet wrote:

    In article
    <[email protected]>, dsi100
    @yahoo.com says...

    On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 3:22:37 +0000, Tahitian pearl wrote:

    https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/science/boiled-egg-perfect-cooking-methods/index.html

    My granddaughter found an egg on the ground at school and bought it
    home. It's most likely a chicken egg. We took a look at it by shining a
    light through the egg but there was nothing there. The idea of no yolk
    in an egg is pretty exciting.

    When "candling" an egg (shining a light through it) you
    would only "see something" if and when the fertilised egg
    starts developing an embryo chicken.

    Janet UK



    That's rather important. Thanks for the info.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)