XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, talk.politics.drugs, uk.politics.drugs
XPost: alt.drugs, rec.drugs.smart

Obviously healthcare is a right if you're willing to pay for it. Maybe it's a right if you're not able to pay for it also. We're in between freedom of wealth
and unity of wealth; and Laissez-Faire libertarian economics is as discredited by
most modern-day economists, as Marxism. The degree of socialism that is rightful
may be dependent upon the wealth of society as a whole. Every country has taxation. If the rich were decatrillionaires they would certainly owe us everything. Even certain things may be a basic right regardless of how impoverished we are. The public lands, K-12 education, transportation, K-20 education, health care, basic food - grain, a guaranteed job at a reasonable wage,
housing. In Australia it's the law that you must share water. It's Freedom of wealth vs. Unity of wealth, and intelligence and truth, and reason must guide us
in between freedom, and unity.

We want:
Free Health Care, for everyone
Free K-20 education, for everyone
A guaranteed job at a minimum wage of at least 10% the maximum spendable income,
for everyone.
Free Grain.
Maybe free housing.

You make something out of something. You make nothing out of nothing. Some may
make nothing out of something, but something is a prerequisite to make something,
and no one but Jesus, or those who have become like him, will make something out
of apparently nothing.

Nepotism - wealth by inheritance - isn't fair. But poverty and economic inequality must be corrected and addressed. No one should starve. No one should
go without health care; everyone should have an opportunity to a full education,
everyone should have a job at a reasonable minimum wage today.

Unequal economic opportunity isn't right, and justifies armed robbery and war. The
response of those of the opposing viewpoint may be war as well, but they have no
intelligent hope of leading or convincing or reconciling with the adversary.

What I say is true. I intend to lead others with this truth. Marxism overthrew
aristocracy, and threatened human rights worldwide. Its intended plan was to overthrow the world. The U.S. revolutionary war begun over taxation. While Marxist criticisms of capitalism had some merit, its solutions were worse. Socialism has merit to a degree. The question is, to what degree. We deserve a
prosperous society and not a degenerate one. We deserve our free rights. We deserve a free country and we've been promised one all along. But we deserve some
owed rights additionally. It wouldn't be right to let only the rich own a limited
air supply. People have died without cancer treatments because they had not health care, and couldn't afford them. Libertarian economics is crap and justifies armed robbery and war, and any who disagree can go to hell, as their established government has been telling my people to go to hell all along.

In the future, weapons of mass destruction will increase and proliferate, it's just a matter of time. How long? 50 years? 500 years? 5000 years? You see how
quickly the world has changed in the last 100. And you may have no option but to
make even the upset serial massacrist happy. There's the negative argument. Intelligence, logic and reason should always prevail. Good thought precedes good
action. We can think better thoughts if we try.

Are those who withhold from you and prohibit you your friends? Or are they enemies worth going to war with? Armed robbery is rampant in major metropolitan
areas, and less than 50% of robberies are caught. You may look it up on crimemapping.com. You may check out the number of robberies alone, in the last 6
months in an urban area. You may read it and weep. In Los Angeles there are 20
robberies per day, 6,000 per year. San Francisco looks worse. But the population
vs. the property must be planned. The labor force vs. the capital must be planned. Unplanned pregnancy is the number one culprit. It is the scourge of our
society and civilization in general. A one child per woman advocation could be a
step further. We should advocate the use of 2 different concurrent types of birth
control for penis in vagina sexual activity. Sex is a positive, social, recreational, and holy activity, but unsafe sex without righteous abortion is immoral. We should have free birth control like free health care. There is no brain in the fetus in the first three months, and from the stories of those with
memories of the womb, easily found on the internet, there is likely no ghost either, for they report memories of the womb as early as 5 months before birth, and memories of being a ghost before these memories as well.
If there is no ghost in the fetus and no brain in the fetus, in the first three months, then we should have free federal abortions in the first three months. That there is no ghost or brain in the fetus in the first three months seems possible. In other words in the first three months the fetus is possibly not a living person who will die if you detach your body.

You have a right to detach your body from someone, vs. the ethical requirement to
throw someone a rope. You weren't born Siamese twins. Any letting somebody eat
your body for 6 months is more onerous than throwing somebody a rope. But life doesn't begin at childbirth, but before it. Death is a tragedy. And to give is
divine.

Your body is yours. Drug users are not going to practice abstinence. There are
too many crack babies, but everyone deserves an equal chance. But what value are
the lives of slaves of poverty. Overpopulation will lead to war. The Great Depression of the 1930s felt most heavily in Germany, lead to the German Holocaust. Like any species that overpopulates its environment, mass extermination will result in one way or another if we do not resort to population
planning. We have not the capital for the labor. We have not the property for the population. There are 1 billion starving worldwide. There are 40 million starving in America. Please make positive changes.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, talk.politics.drugs, uk.politics.drugs
XPost: alt.drugs, rec.drugs.smart

On 1/8/2018 1:06 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:

Socialism has merit to a degree. The question is, to what degree. We deserve a
prosperous society and not a degenerate one. We deserve our free rights. We deserve a free country and we've been promised one all along. But we deserve some
owed rights additionally. It wouldn't be right to let only the rich own a limited
air supply. People have died without cancer treatments because they had not health care, and couldn't afford them. Libertarian economics is crap and justifies armed robbery and war, and any who disagree can go to hell, as their
established government has been telling my people to go to hell all along.

And where's your human right to law enforcement against drug possession? What gives you the right to tax for the drug war and not for health care?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.activism.drug-war, talk.politics.drugs, uk.politics.drugs
XPost: alt.drugs, rec.drugs.smart

On 1/8/2018 1:06 PM, Intelligent Party wrote:

Libertarian economics is crap and justifies armed robbery and war, and any who
disagree can go to hell, as their established government has been telling my people to go to hell all along.

Libertarian economics would have no K-12, no minimum wage, no free roads, and no
public parks. Libertarian economics would have an even more impoverished society,
because prosperity requires starting with something to make something, and slavery
and exploitation are the alternative. Libertarian economics would have an uneducated, unskilled, impoverished society, and apparently would not be with one
equal wage, by the hour, for everybody either. But libertarian economics rather
believes in the imagination that doesn't exist, that the unregulated free market
can somehow be righteousness, and never studied macroeconomics.

Libertarian politicians believe in getting back on the gold standard and ask stupid questions of the Chairman of the Federal Reserve in congressional hearings,
that a student with an Introduction to Macroeconomics class could answer.

The libertarian party will never gain support until it embraces socialism.

Libertarian economics is a joke (without much more study and explanation and proof
leastways). And we deserve a righteous political party that believes in freedom
and intelligent forms of neo-socialism.

Marxism was wrong. But Capitalism is wrong too. And there can be something better in between, so long as we make sure we're saving capital too. The world can be fairer, and we deserve a fairer economic opportunity, and fairer economic
enjoyment.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)