• Re: =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBXaGF0IHRoZSBDb25zdGl0dXRpb24sIFN1cHJlbWUgQ291c

    From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:10:30 2025
    In article <ygq0Q.118189$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    Is it your claim that citizenship can be absolutely proven by a court
    any more than a forum?

    I don't know what a "forum" is in this context, but I do know it's far
    more absolutely provable in a court than it is from a foreign prison.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:33:07 2025
    In article <tXp0Q.854766$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    You cannot argue with either an honest birth certificate or now a Real
    ID. Birth Certificates are certified at the time and place of your
    birth.

    I'm not sure how that's relevant when you're already on a plane over international waters on the way to your Salvadorian prison. But feel
    free to tell the "flight attendants" about it.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:24:08 2025
    In article <pbq0Q.746378$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    I have a Real ID in my pocket right now. All traveler outside of the
    national boundaries has to show proof of citizenship (a passport) at
    all times.

    Indeed, you should carry it inside the national boundaries at all times,
    as well, since some people apparently think you can be deported without
    a hearing if anyone suspects you of being in the country illegally.

    Look, I watched approximately 100 illegals vote for Obama at my local
    voting place.

    I'm really curious how you knew for a fact they were illegal. But that's
    not really what I'm on about here.

    What I'm on about is that without a hearing, any crooked cop could point
    a finger at you and have you deported to prison for life for being an
    illegal immigrant. It's all about the due process.

    Do you REALLY think that anything close to a majority voted for Biden?

    I wasn't sure, but after Trump lost 60+ court cases trying to prove
    illegal voting activity, I'm pretty confident that things were on the
    up-and-up overall. 60+ court cases is a LOT of vetting. Hats off to
    Trump for being so thorough. :)

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:29:20 2025
    In article <L%p0Q.615078$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    As I said, you CANNOT argue with a birth certificate and they are ALL computerized now. So all, you need is a time and place of birth. An
    Illegal can say he is someone else. But school records and possible
    military records rapidly clear that up

    Something that I'm sure can be done at a hearing. Due process.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:42:07 2025
    In article <A6p0Q.372615$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    why would El Salvador have a warrany out in his name.

    No idea. Maybe that's a good item to bring before a US court.

    Is it your belief they have unlimited prison space?

    It's relatively unlimited. Trump asked Bukele to build five more and
    we're paying him for all the prisoners he takes.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:50:31 2025
    In article <FPo0Q.542385$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    Were it relly the case that we deported a member of MS-13 mistakenly
    under mistaken identity [...] why did he have a warrany out for him in
    his home country? And how did he manage to stay alive here since MS-13
    kill fakers?

    I don't know. Let's get it to court and get an answer, what do you say?

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Sat Jun 7 01:48:19 2025
    In article <A0p0Q.542754$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    Are you saying you're willing to foot the bill for paying for enough
    prisons to house these people until the inrvitsble "tguilty" sends them
    on their way.

    Yes, I absolutely am. Because without due process, we no longer live in
    a free country. I am willing to pay almost unlimited amounts of money to
    keep us living in a free country.

    Those sections of the Constitution were written when the Democrats
    weren't peying criminals to come to the US to practice their trade.

    There's a mechanism in the Constitution to remove the due process rules
    if you want to do that. But I strenuously suggest you do not. A million Americans have given their lives defending those parts of our founding document, so it might be wise to think twice before you shrug them off.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 11 17:31:22 2025
    In article <8jG1Q.965767$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    I'm curious to know why you think that citizens can be declared as
    criminals without court trial findings?

    I would have thought this was obvious, but:

    1. A law enforcement agency accuses a citizen of being a non-citizen.
    2. That law enforcement agency immediately puts the accused on a plane
    to a foreign prison because non-citizens don't have the right to due
    process.

    But maybe never in the history of the United States has a citizen ever
    been accused of being a non-citizen, who can know.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 14 20:23:41 2025
    On Sat Jun 14 20:21:15 2025 cyclintom wrote:
    On Thu Jun 5 19:49:36 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/5/2025 7:07 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    On Thu Jun 5 14:55:39 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 6/5/2025 2:38 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 13:14:40 -0500, AMuzi <[email protected]> wrote: >>>
    On 6/5/2025 12:59 PM, Beej Jorgensen wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Catrike Ryder <[email protected]> wrote:
    No, they mnay have got a hearing when they showed that they were >>>>>> citizens, but not before.

    And so you must always carry proof of citizenship 100% of the time, or
    else you're deported without hearing. Don't leave home without it, kids.


    I'm not advocating either way but merely being a US citizen
    and walking around with no ID can get you arrested (depends
    on the jurisdiction and circumstances).

    https://www.criminaldefenselawyer.com/crime-penalties/federal/Failure-identify-police-officer.htm

    https://legalclarity.org/do-you-have-to-identify-yourself-to-the-police/

    There were (are?) places where no ID and "no visible means
    of support" is defined as vagrancy = 3 days and a ride to
    the county line. Happened to me, long ago.

    Vagrancy is another thing.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    It's an unclear issue, especially that some States hand out
    ID and even driving licenses to illegal aliens. US citizen
    vagrants would imaginably be unable to prove identity while
    standing next to a deportable illegal with valid ID.

    Again I take no position on this or that but "no ID" is a
    very fuzzy standard.




    A driver's lisence is suppose to clearly say citizen or undocumented alien.


    And you trust Shirley Weber on that??
    I do not.




    I trust NO ONE in the California government and my illegal but applied for US citizenship neighbor across the stree is of the same mind.

    We now see that the recount in Canada shows that they took the3ir lessons from Washinton, Oregon and California and simply counterfeit the electorate they need to get elected. Only Canadians are having none of it and have shown the corruption of the
    Liberals. Their candidate has now relinguished his claim to the office.

    I described my experience with the Democrats beinging in 50 or so illegals to vote for Obama in his second election and you seem to think election fraud perfectly OK as long as your candidate was elected. When all of the election laws were shattered to
    use fraud to elect Biden that too was perfectly fine with you. Your claims that no one can tell a legal from an illegal are so corrupt that you're going to accidently repeat them in front of your "friends" and discover the hard way that they are not your
    friends.




    Sorry, this was directed to Frank.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jul 14 22:50:59 2025
    In article <NEcdQ.1359399$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon Jun 23 19:58:42 2025 Beej Jorgensen wrote:
    In article <[email protected]>,
    Catrike Ryder <[email protected]> wrote:
    Liberals do stand up for each other. They even supported a liberal
    politician who babbled incoherent nonsense and couldn't find his way
    off the stage.

    Didn't they kick him out?

    In assume that is supposed to be a wiseass reference to President
    Trump.

    That would be false, if you look at the context. Unless Trump is "a
    liberal politician who babbled incoherent nonsense and couldn't find his
    way off a stage", I must have been talking about Biden.

    You really need more education

    Do I, now.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Beej Jorgensen@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jul 14 22:45:33 2025
    In article <twddQ.332972$[email protected]>,
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    Brian, you're quite right. But they STILL voted for him over a
    Republican.

    They voted for him over Trump. There are a lot of people like me who,
    when Trump said it was allowable to terminate the articles of the
    Constitution, decided the man wasn't fit to be President of the United
    States since that's a direct contradiction to his oath of office. Not to mention a seriously offensive thing to say to all Americans.

    So from my perspective, I'd have voted for a wet bag of rocks before
    Trump, since the wet bag of rocks has more respect for the Constitution
    than he does.

    And they looked the other way at election fraud so flagrant that it
    takes people like Flunky to claim "there was not proof".

    Trump made me extremely confident with his 60+ court cases that there
    was no fraud. That was a lot of thorough investigation, maybe more than
    has happened in any other election.

    You'll never find a stronger proponent for legitimate and complete
    elections than myself, and I encouraged all those court cases. If there
    was something there, I wanted to know about it. And after all that, they
    failed to show fraud despite having so-called mountains of evidence.

    --
    Brian "Beej Jorgensen" Hall | [email protected]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)