• Re: Food Prices topic drift to TIME

    From pH@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 16:02:16 2025
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)

    pH in Aptos

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 12:18:31 2025
    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)

    pH in Aptos

    DEcimal timekeeping was recently brought up in this forum, I do believe
    Jeff offered some historical insight at that time

    --
    Add xx to reply

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 13:00:07 2025
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 16:02:16 -0000 (UTC), pH <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. >Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)

    pH in Aptos

    The decimal system became popular because we (most of us) have ten
    fingers. As a programmer, I think I'd prefer a hexidecimal system
    where we also use our earlobes, nostrils, and eyebrows.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AMuzi@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 2 14:19:50 2025
    On 6/2/2025 11:02 AM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)

    pH in Aptos

    Like geometry (360 degree circle) and Zodiac (12 sky
    portions), it has Sumerian roots.

    The French Directorate tried that along with decimal
    calendar. Wasn't successful.

    --
    Andrew Muzi
    [email protected]
    Open every day since 1 April, 1971

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Mon Jun 2 23:59:13 2025
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have
    instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: <https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> <https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    --
    Jeff Liebermann [email protected]
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 3 03:26:28 2025
    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: ><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> ><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 3 04:28:00 2025
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 16:02:16 -0000 (UTC), pH <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. >Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)

    pH in Aptos

    There is a significant difference between simply using 24 hour time
    pieces and changing the structure of how we identify time.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pH@21:1/5 to Jeff Liebermann on Tue Jun 3 18:28:01 2025
    On 2025-06-03, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available:
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> ><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>


    Thanks to Frank and Jeff....I think a decimal clock on the wall would be a
    cool conversation piece at any rate...

    pH

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Tue Jun 3 19:41:10 2025
    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: <https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants
    to do without my help.

    --
    Jeff Liebermann [email protected]
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 04:39:47 2025
    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:10 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24 >>>>>> hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and >>>>>> slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the >>>>>> analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>>>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task.... >>>>>
    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >>><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >>><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: ><https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants
    to do without my help.

    That answer has errors. Computers do not "favor" decimal arithmatic.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 04:59:01 2025
    On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:28:01 -0000 (UTC), pH <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2025-06-03, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24
    hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and
    slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour
    timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the
    analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task....

    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>


    Thanks to Frank and Jeff....I think a decimal clock on the wall would be a >cool conversation piece at any rate...

    pH

    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 4 09:01:06 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:39:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:10 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24 >>>>>>> hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and >>>>>>> slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>>>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>>>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>>>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of
    course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour >>>>>>> timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the >>>>>>> analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times.
    Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have >>>>>> instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task.... >>>>>>
    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >>>><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >>>><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: >><https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants
    to do without my help.

    That answer has errors. Computers do not "favor" decimal arithmatic.

    I beg to differ. Most CPU's support IEEE 754-2008 Decimal
    Floating-Point Arithmetic. <https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/tool/intel-decimal-floating-point-math-library.html>
    "Software implementation of the IEEE 754-2008 Decimal Floating-Point
    Arithmetic specification, aimed at financial applications, especially
    in cases where legal requirements make it necessary to use decimal,
    and not binary floating-point arithmetic (as computation performed
    with binary floating-point operations may introduce small, but
    unacceptable errors)."

    There was a short time, in the 1960's, when I was receiving interest
    payments from my bank, with rounding errors.

    "IEEE-754 Floating Point Converter" <https://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html>

    Rounding errors, when going from binary to floating point, is a common
    problem found in calculations that extend to a large number of decimal
    digits, such as weather calculations. See the part about weather
    calculations:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rounding-error.asp>





    --
    Jeff Liebermann [email protected]
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 4 09:18:18 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:59:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:28:01 -0000 (UTC), pH <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    Thanks to Frank and Jeff....I think a decimal clock on the wall would be a >>cool conversation piece at any rate...

    pH

    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?

    One of my former customers was a collector of clocks. He had
    collection of antique wooden clocks dating back in the middle ages. He
    also collected a few water clocks and clocks with odd displays. I
    helped repair a binary clock with neon lights, an analog clock that
    ran backwards, early clock simulations on the original IBM 5150 PC,
    and other oddities. I don't recall if he had a decimal clock.

    My first attempt at displaying an analog clock was written in Turbo
    Pascal and was on display in the window of a local computer store for
    about a year. People would walk by and set their wristwatches by the
    indicated time. I didn't have the heart to tell them that the IBM PC
    RTC was a rather inaccurate and not very temperature stable time base.

    Odd clocks
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=odd%20clocks&udm=2>

    Yes, there are people who talk about clocks.


    --
    Jeff Liebermann [email protected]
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 12:40:05 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:18:18 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:59:01 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 3 Jun 2025 18:28:01 -0000 (UTC), pH <[email protected]>
    wrote:
    Thanks to Frank and Jeff....I think a decimal clock on the wall would be a >>>cool conversation piece at any rate...

    pH

    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?

    One of my former customers was a collector of clocks. He had
    collection of antique wooden clocks dating back in the middle ages. He
    also collected a few water clocks and clocks with odd displays. I
    helped repair a binary clock with neon lights, an analog clock that
    ran backwards, early clock simulations on the original IBM 5150 PC,
    and other oddities. I don't recall if he had a decimal clock.

    My first attempt at displaying an analog clock was written in Turbo
    Pascal and was on display in the window of a local computer store for
    about a year. People would walk by and set their wristwatches by the >indicated time. I didn't have the heart to tell them that the IBM PC
    RTC was a rather inaccurate and not very temperature stable time base.

    Odd clocks
    <https://www.google.com/search?q=odd%20clocks&udm=2>

    Yes, there are people who talk about clocks.

    I suppose so. I don't "talk" about much of anything. I prefer writing.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 12:37:22 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:01:06 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:39:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:10 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24 >>>>>>>> hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and >>>>>>>> slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all >>>>>>>> but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in >>>>>>>> today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the >>>>>>>> 12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of >>>>>>>> course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour >>>>>>>> timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the >>>>>>>> analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. >>>>>>> Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have
    instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task.... >>>>>>>
    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >>>>><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >>>>><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: >>><https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants
    to do without my help.

    That answer has errors. Computers do not "favor" decimal arithmatic.

    I beg to differ. Most CPU's support IEEE 754-2008 Decimal
    Floating-Point Arithmetic. ><https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/tool/intel-decimal-floating-point-math-library.html>
    "Software implementation of the IEEE 754-2008 Decimal Floating-Point >Arithmetic specification, aimed at financial applications, especially
    in cases where legal requirements make it necessary to use decimal,
    and not binary floating-point arithmetic (as computation performed
    with binary floating-point operations may introduce small, but
    unacceptable errors)."

    There was a short time, in the 1960's, when I was receiving interest
    payments from my bank, with rounding errors.

    "IEEE-754 Floating Point Converter" ><https://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html>

    Rounding errors, when going from binary to floating point, is a common >problem found in calculations that extend to a large number of decimal >digits, such as weather calculations. See the part about weather >calculations:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rounding-error.asp>

    I'm sure you know that all computers function in variations of binary.
    They have to convert to decimal for humans.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 4 13:45:46 2025
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 12:55:09 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?

    Yes, obviously.

    Well, yes, I know you do, but you bluster and blabber on about lots of insignificant nonsense. It's what you need to do to drown out your insecurities.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Zen Cycle@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 15:34:55 2025
    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?
    Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 4 17:58:49 2025
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:20:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 3:34 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?
    Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

    That, plus from what he's posted here, he's too timid to engage in much >conversation. His excuse is that conversation isn't interesting, but how >would he know without conversing?

    I hear people conversing about insignificant stuff. Religion, sports,
    politics, Everybody's opinions, and they bore me. Nothing there for me
    to process, which is pretty much what heppens here on RBT.

    Also note that he's quite passionate about posting his ignorant opinions
    here - where it's "safe" and he doesn't actually have to deal with
    people face to face. Because face to face interaction is so scary!

    I dealt with many people face to face. Electric company presidents,
    and other VPs came to office many times to ask about the software I
    was writing for them. In the end, before I left, I put on a catered
    show to explain how it worked. There were over 40 people there from
    companies from three states.

    After I retired, I put together a Karaoke and entertainment shows for
    weddings, parties and such where I played the chord organ and sang.

    https://www.flickr.com/photos/j_soloman/53939892119/

    Related: >https://www.6sqft.com/chatting-with-strangers-on-your-morning-commute-will-make-you-happier-study-says/
    But it only makes one happier if they can summon the nerve! ;-)

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Liebermann@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Wed Jun 4 15:04:35 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:37:22 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:01:06 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:39:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:10 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24 >>>>>>>>> hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and >>>>>>>>> slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once >>>>>>>>> you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of >>>>>>>>> course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour >>>>>>>>> timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one. >>>>>>>>>
    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog >>>>>>>>> and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the >>>>>>>>> analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. >>>>>>>> Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have
    instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task.... >>>>>>>>
    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >>>>>><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >>>>>><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: >>>><https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants
    to do without my help.

    That answer has errors. Computers do not "favor" decimal arithmatic.

    I beg to differ. Most CPU's support IEEE 754-2008 Decimal
    Floating-Point Arithmetic. >><https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/tool/intel-decimal-floating-point-math-library.html>
    "Software implementation of the IEEE 754-2008 Decimal Floating-Point >>Arithmetic specification, aimed at financial applications, especially
    in cases where legal requirements make it necessary to use decimal,
    and not binary floating-point arithmetic (as computation performed
    with binary floating-point operations may introduce small, but
    unacceptable errors)."

    There was a short time, in the 1960's, when I was receiving interest >>payments from my bank, with rounding errors.

    "IEEE-754 Floating Point Converter" >><https://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html>

    Rounding errors, when going from binary to floating point, is a common >>problem found in calculations that extend to a large number of decimal >>digits, such as weather calculations. See the part about weather >>calculations:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rounding-error.asp>

    I'm sure you know that all computers function in variations of binary.
    They have to convert to decimal for humans.

    Not all computers. Today's home and SBC (small business computers)
    use an ALU (arithmetic logic unit) to perform bit wise arithmetic on
    integer binary numbers. They also include an FPU (floating point
    unit) which operates on floating point numbers (per IEEE 754-2008).

    Then, there is quantum computing. It uses qubits, which can be 0, 1,
    or both at the same time. I'll pretend to understand how it works.

    There's also tri state logic:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-state_logic>


    --
    Jeff Liebermann [email protected]
    PO Box 272 http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
    Ben Lomond CA 95005-0272
    Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 4 18:09:01 2025
    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 15:04:35 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 12:37:22 -0400, Catrike Ryder
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 09:01:06 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On Wed, 04 Jun 2025 04:39:47 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:10 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>>wrote:

    On Tue, 03 Jun 2025 03:26:28 -0400, Catrike Ryder >>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On Mon, 02 Jun 2025 23:59:13 -0700, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>>>>>wrote:

    On Mon, 2 Jun 2025 23:04:27 -0400, Frank Krygowski >>>>>>><[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/2/2025 12:02 PM, pH wrote:
    <snip food price postings>


    I opted for digital watches when my job required that I think in 24 >>>>>>>>>> hour time with minute to minute acccuracy, which is much harder and >>>>>>>>>> slower to do with an analong timepiece. I have several watches and all
    but my old Scuba Dive watch are on digital 24 hour time, because once
    you use 24 hour time, you see how ridiculous 12 hour timekeeping is in
    today's world. It is, however, hard to convince people who've used the
    12 hour time all their lives.

    I understand why 12 hour time first came into being. It was, of >>>>>>>>>> course, long before digital clocks and watches. An analog 24 hour >>>>>>>>>> timepiece is harder and slower to read accurately than a 12 hour one.

    The later system operations control rooms I worked in had both analog
    and a digital 24 hour clocks, but nobody paid any attention to the >>>>>>>>>> analog clocks.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    And I wonder whey we have these weird 12 hour sixty minute times. >>>>>>>>> Babylonians?

    I would have thought that when the MKS system came along they would have
    instituted
    10 hour days
    100 minutes per hour and
    100 seconds per minute

    to go along with meters, kilograms and seconds....

    But I think the societal re-tooling would be far too great a task.... >>>>>>>>>
    (cue Jeff L's fabulous research skills...)
    It may be too easy for Jeff.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decimal_time

    Thanks. I forgot to look.

    Notice that Decimal Analog Clocks and watches are available: >>>>>>><https://www.google.com/search?q=%22decimal%22%20clock&num=10&udm=2> >>>>>>><https://svalbard24.com/DECIMAL-WATCHES-c137983753>

    I don't see any advantrage to using decimal time.


    Advantages of using decimal time

    I asked ChatGPT 3.5(free). It produced a rather longish answer: >>>>><https://chatgpt.com/share/683fb02e-7b2c-800c-9d5f-39e7daf40701>

    I've never been able to tell time anything. Time does what it wants >>>>>to do without my help.

    That answer has errors. Computers do not "favor" decimal arithmatic.

    I beg to differ. Most CPU's support IEEE 754-2008 Decimal
    Floating-Point Arithmetic. >>><https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/tool/intel-decimal-floating-point-math-library.html>
    "Software implementation of the IEEE 754-2008 Decimal Floating-Point >>>Arithmetic specification, aimed at financial applications, especially
    in cases where legal requirements make it necessary to use decimal,
    and not binary floating-point arithmetic (as computation performed
    with binary floating-point operations may introduce small, but >>>unacceptable errors)."

    There was a short time, in the 1960's, when I was receiving interest >>>payments from my bank, with rounding errors.

    "IEEE-754 Floating Point Converter" >>><https://www.h-schmidt.net/FloatConverter/IEEE754.html>

    Rounding errors, when going from binary to floating point, is a common >>>problem found in calculations that extend to a large number of decimal >>>digits, such as weather calculations. See the part about weather >>>calculations:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/r/rounding-error.asp>

    I'm sure you know that all computers function in variations of binary.
    They have to convert to decimal for humans.

    Not all computers. Today's home and SBC (small business computers)
    use an ALU (arithmetic logic unit) to perform bit wise arithmetic on
    integer binary numbers. They also include an FPU (floating point
    unit) which operates on floating point numbers (per IEEE 754-2008).

    Key word is bitwise

    Then, there is quantum computing. It uses qubits, which can be 0, 1,
    or both at the same time. I'll pretend to understand how it works.

    I won't

    There's also tri state logic: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three-state_logic>

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Krygowski@21:1/5 to Catrike Ryder on Thu Jun 5 00:23:17 2025
    On 6/4/2025 5:58 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:20:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 3:34 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?
    Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

    That, plus from what he's posted here, he's too timid to engage in much
    conversation. His excuse is that conversation isn't interesting, but how
    would he know without conversing?

    I hear people conversing about insignificant stuff. Religion, sports, politics, Everybody's opinions, and they bore me. Nothing there for me
    to process, which is pretty much what heppens here on RBT.

    :-) But you seemed to think it would be fascinating for us to hear
    about your Made-In-China barbecue grill!

    Another explanation for your avoidance of people occurs to me. You may
    have gotten frustrated by years of people yawning at your conversation attempts, and turned aside with hurt feelings.

    But I still think timidity and fear are your main motivators.

    I dealt with many people face to face. Electric company presidents,
    and other VPs came to office many times to ask about the software I
    was writing for them. In the end, before I left, I put on a catered
    show to explain how it worked. There were over 40 people there from
    companies from three states.

    After I retired, I put together a Karaoke and entertainment shows for weddings, parties and such where I played the chord organ and sang.
    Well, look at you! :-)

    --
    - Frank Krygowski

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Thu Jun 5 04:14:53 2025
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 00:23:17 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 5:58 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:20:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 3:34 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?
    Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

    That, plus from what he's posted here, he's too timid to engage in much
    conversation. His excuse is that conversation isn't interesting, but how >>> would he know without conversing?

    I hear people conversing about insignificant stuff. Religion, sports,
    politics, Everybody's opinions, and they bore me. Nothing there for me
    to process, which is pretty much what heppens here on RBT.

    :-) But you seemed to think it would be fascinating for us to hear
    about your Made-In-China barbecue grill!

    Actually, it's a griddle, not a grill.

    As for being fascinating, it's something I actually did rather than
    your made up story about your imaginary gun designing "friend."

    Another explanation for your avoidance of people occurs to me. You may
    have gotten frustrated by years of people yawning at your conversation >attempts, and turned aside with hurt feelings.

    But I still think timidity and fear are your main motivators.

    That's from a wussy guy who has never done anything in his entire life
    that required even the slightest bit of risk. It's no wonder he's a
    member of the political party that hates masculine men.

    I dealt with many people face to face. Electric company presidents,
    and other VPs came to office many times to ask about the software I
    was writing for them. In the end, before I left, I put on a catered
    show to explain how it worked. There were over 40 people there from
    companies from three states.

    After I retired, I put together a Karaoke and entertainment shows for
    weddings, parties and such where I played the chord organ and sang.
    Well, look at you! :-)

    Indeed... Unlike you, I counter your accusations with facts. You run
    away and hide whenever I mention your narcissism because you know it's
    true.

    --
    "when will they ever learn?"
    --Pete Seeger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Catrike Ryder@21:1/5 to [email protected] on Fri Jun 6 04:39:05 2025
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 23:54:03 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/5/2025 4:14 AM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 00:23:17 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 5:58 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote:
    On Wed, 4 Jun 2025 17:20:38 -0400, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 6/4/2025 3:34 PM, Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 6/4/2025 4:59 AM, floriduh dumbass wrote:


    Does anyone ever really talk about conversation pieces?
    Yes, except you, because you're willfully ignorant.

    That, plus from what he's posted here, he's too timid to engage in much >>>>> conversation. His excuse is that conversation isn't interesting, but how >>>>> would he know without conversing?

    I hear people conversing about insignificant stuff. Religion, sports,
    politics, Everybody's opinions, and they bore me. Nothing there for me >>>> to process, which is pretty much what heppens here on RBT.

    :-) But you seemed to think it would be fascinating for us to hear
    about your Made-In-China barbecue grill!

    Actually, it's a griddle, not a grill.

    As for being fascinating, it's something I actually did rather than
    your made up story about your imaginary gun designing "friend."
    Nope. I don't believe you "actually did" that. I don't believe you can
    sing or play even a chord organ. I don't believe you own either a
    griddle or a grill.

    You seem to think I care what you believe, probably because you're a narcissistic and care very deeply what others believe about you.

    You're the one who always demands documentation and proof, but you've
    given none. (A photo of some guy holding a microphone isn't proof.)

    Unlike you, I never demand anything. I simply make note of your brags
    and that unlike me and others on RBT, you seldom document anything.

    You see, I don't brag, I simply post appropriate responses to your
    accusations, sometimes documented, sometimes not. You and everyone
    else is free to believe them or not. Makes no never-mind to me.

    So you're not meeting your own standards. Such internal inconsistency is
    a sign of logical weakness at best, and outright lies at worst.

    Another display of Krygowski's inability to understand basic logic.

    --
    C'est bon
    Soloman

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)