• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBNYWNoaW5lIFNob3A=?=

    From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 15:32:37 2025
    On Sun Feb 23 10:16:26 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 2/23/2025 9:47 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 2/22/2025 11:04 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    If the tubing were thin enough, it
    might be springy enough for self healing dents. However,
    the same
    springiness will also provide a springy ride.

    Nope. If the dent is visible when the impact is over, it's
    not going to self heal.


    +1

    It's either within the elastic limits or it is permanent
    deformation. Can't be both.




    I'm getting pretty tired of hearing how something I actually experienced isn't possible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 15:38:27 2025
    On Sun Feb 23 13:05:12 2025 John B. wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:04:09 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 07:26:05 +0700, John B. <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 13:06:13 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>wrote:

    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:58:29 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]> >>>wrote:

    On Fri Nov 8 14:03:46 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    It doesn't exist, Tom. You can't pop a dent out a bicycle frame tube by >>>>> riding the bike. Thinking you can is a sign of insanity.

    If you have a slight dent in high performance steel. the tubing can revert to its natural shape under stress.

    Tom. The only steel that might do that is spring steel (1095, 1060, >>>1075, 1080, etc). Bicycle frames are not made from spring steel. If >>>they were made from spring steel, they would ride like the proverbial >>>wet noodle.

    Errr... 1095 is not "spring steel". At least not in the metal working >>field. It is simply a high carbon steel and one common use is knife >>blades and other cutting devices :-)

    True, but I beg to differ slightly. Wikipedia lists 1095 as "Blue, or >polished bright spring steel". Same with McMaster-Carr catalog: ><https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_steel> ><https://www.mcmaster.com/catalog/116/3630>

    During the 1960's, I was working in my father's lingerie factory after >school. We couldn't afford a resident toolmaker to build the sewing >machine attachments. So, I was volunteered to do the work. My father
    took home a few tools and some stock including a box of assorted coils
    of spring steel. When he died in 1995(?), I inherited the tools and
    metal stock which included some 1095 coils and scrap.

    However, it seems that it's also suitable for knives. I know a little >about knife making and sharpening. I made one knife from a kit: ><https://www.knifekits.com>
    I do fairly well (for a beginner) at sharpening. 1095 is considered a
    good steel for knifemaking because of it's edge retention. It's most >suitable for survival knives. 1095 has no corrosion resistance and >therefore poor edge retention in corrosive environments: ><https://www.bladehq.com/blog/knife-steel-guide#1095>

    You can make a knife out of a rock if that is all you have so lets not
    get carried away :-)

    Like most things the material used to make a knife is largely
    dependent on what you intend to use it for.
    And before we get further, I spent quite a bit of my life working with metals, from forging and making knives from old files to managing a
    machine shop where far more modern steels are used in jet engines and
    that sort of thing

    And yes there are steels to make different knives, and over the years
    I've made a lot of knives ranging from my wives kitchen knives to a
    "special" hunting knife for my Father's Christmas present, and not to
    mention all the shop cutting tools over the years.

    To my mind a "good knife" is a knife that works well for the use that
    you intend to use it for. My wife's (she's gone now) are still in the
    kitchen and still work as well as they did when I made then nearly 30
    years ago, she complained of a store bought knife and I, foolishly,
    made her a good carbon-steel knife and went from being "Master of the
    House" to "kitchen knife maker" over night :-(

    For bicycle frame use, it could probably survive a crash, but will
    corrode away in the first rain. If the tubing were thin enough, it
    might be springy enough for self healing dents. However, the same >springiness will also provide a springy ride.

    And, no bicycle frames are not made from knife quality carbon steel
    although it could be that when I as a lad bike frames might well have
    been made of low carbon tubing as from memory they did bend a lot in a
    crash.




    Didn't you just learn that liebermann believes that "spring steel" tubing isn't proper material for a bicycle tube which requires the tubular shape for the proper strength and not material?

    And he no doubt will tell you that a file is spring steel.

    I am having a hard time dealing with people who have never accomplished a thing in their lives telling people with actual experience that they don't know what they're talking about.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 16:17:26 2025
    On Sat Feb 22 12:36:11 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Having the boss monitor you with a stopwatch is characteristic of a
    job where you are paid by the millisecond. That sometimes works with
    hourly employees. However, it doesn't apply to salaried professional
    or exempt employees who are more commonly paid by the job and not by
    the millisecond:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exempt-employee.asp>
    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an
    exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    I also find it odd the you wrote "a boss" instead of "my boss" or "my manager". Hourly employees might have one of more managers. Salaried professionals usually have a single manager, even if you worked for a committee.

    At one company, the chief engineer would walk around the lab and
    remark "am I paying you for this" if he saw anyone doing something he considered not job related. Eventually, he was asked by the other
    managers to stop doing that because it was highly disruptive and
    usually resulted in work coming to a screeching halt.




    Jeff, what do you know about real jobs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 16:19:53 2025
    On Mon Feb 24 11:08:29 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:04:15 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>


    I never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full attention to your job.

    I imagine that's probably true in your case.



    You are so over the top that you don't even REMEMBER what work is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 16:23:08 2025
    On Sun Feb 23 08:14:51 2025 John B. wrote:
    On 22 Feb 2025 22:27:53 GMT, Roger Merriman <[email protected]> wrote:

    Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:04:15 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Fri Nov 8 13:54:21 2024 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 11/8/2024 12:20 PM, cyclintom wrote:

    No company could survive you and a boss that spots you not working and >>>>> does say anything about it.

    Who ever said my boss caught me not working?

    You did asshole - you said that you were watching baseball and your boss >>> came around and asked what the score was - not that he asked why you
    weren't working. I never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full >>> attention to your job.

    Having the boss monitor you with a stopwatch is characteristic of a
    job where you are paid by the millisecond. That sometimes works with
    hourly employees. However, it doesn't apply to salaried professional
    or exempt employees who are more commonly paid by the job and not by
    the millisecond:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exempt-employee.asp>
    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an
    exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    I also find it odd the you wrote "a boss" instead of "my boss" or "my
    manager". Hourly employees might have one of more managers. Salaried
    professionals usually have a single manager, even if you worked for a
    committee.

    At one company, the chief engineer would walk around the lab and
    remark "am I paying you for this" if he saw anyone doing something he
    considered not job related. Eventually, he was asked by the other
    managers to stop doing that because it was highly disruptive and
    usually resulted in work coming to a screeching halt.


    Even paid hourly if one is competent and job is complex might well be down >times waiting for something or someone to start/finish and so would have >flexibility aka time to and opportunity to do personal things or simply >have tea break/chat or whatever.

    Only be stopwatches etc on fairly menial repetitive jobs.

    Roger Merriman


    Way back when, I was running a Machine Shop in the
    Air Force, during one inspection they counted my workers to see
    whether personnel was being used effectively. Disregarding the 2 or 3
    out working on airplanes I had two working on various machines and one
    guy sitting reading a book.

    After the inspection the Maintenance Officer got onto me about shop management and I explained that the two guys running machines were
    working on "home jobs", i.e. work for themselves, as we had only one outstanding work order, and the guy reading the book was reading the Machinerys Handbook
    (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machinery%27s_Handbook)
    to figure just how he was going to do that rather complex job.




    There was a lot of make-work jobs until the end of the draft. After that you had to start treating skilled technicians with respect which was not done during the Vietnam years.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Mar 3 16:27:02 2025
    On Sat Feb 22 13:13:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:36:11 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an
    exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    Sorry, I wasn't very clear. The above sentence should be:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and were probably
    NOT working as an exempt employee, professional, manager, executive,
    or consultant.




    I will ask you again: since the only job you ever worked, the supervisor would not even give you a recommendation, what in hell gives you the idea that you know ANYTHING about working?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 20:54:20 2025
    On Mon Mar 3 12:05:09 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 15:32:37 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    I'm getting pretty tired of hearing how something I actually experienced isn't possible.

    Did you take any photos? Before and after? Such amazing properties
    for bicycle frame tubing should be worthy of acclaim in a scientific
    and cycling journal. If it worked so well for you, why not repeat the experiment? Just hammer a dent in one of your numerous bicycles and
    do whatever magic it takes to remove the dent by just riding around.
    Don't forget to post a video. I have a friend who does automobile
    detailing who would be interested in seeing the video.

    If hearing that you're wrong somehow offends or tires you, simply stop
    lying and fabricating anecdotal evidence. It's very much like you
    claiming that you were offended my evidence and the conveniently
    deciding that you couldn't read the URL's which I had posted. You can
    do the same here by simply burying your head in the sand and
    pretending to not believe anyone who disagrees with you: <https://www.google.com/search?q=hear%20no%20evil%20speak%20no%20evil%20see%20no%20evil&udm=2>




    Every time you post you demonstrate why your entire life hads been one failure after another. Tell me you moron, WHY would I take a picture of a dent on my bike. And if I took a picture of the area that dent had been in after it disappeared what would it
    tell you? If you had ONE thought in yor head it would be lost.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 20:57:49 2025
    On Mon Mar 3 21:28:57 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 3 Mar 2025 19:58:21 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 3/3/2025 3:05 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    If it worked so well for you, why not repeat the
    experiment? Just hammer a dent in one of your numerous bicycles and
    do whatever magic it takes to remove the dent by just riding around.
    Don't forget to post a video.

    That's good advice! If Tom did succeed in removing the dent that way and >documented it indisputably, I think he'd become famous in metallurgical >literature.

    List of metallurgy journals: <https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=top_venues&hl=en&vq=eng_metallurgy>

    Most of these would likely be interested in publishing something about
    Tom's amazing dent-proof technology. Auto body repair groups such as: <https://nationalautobodycouncil.org>
    would likely have a different view.




    Liebermann, don't you think that they might be more interested in your views of Life, the Universe and everything coming from your vaste int3lligence?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 21:28:59 2025
    On Sun Feb 23 12:26:43 2025 John B. wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:10:44 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 20:04:09 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >wrote:

    1095 is considered a
    good steel for knifemaking because of it's edge retention.

    Oops. I wrote that backwards. It should be:

    "1095 is not considered a good steel for knifemaking because of it's
    poor edge retention."

    Maybe good for kitchen knives, most of which do not need a very sharp
    edge.

    https://www.battlebladesinc.com/what-is-it-1095 https://www.sdknives.co.za/product/1095-high-carbon-steel-35mm/?srsltid=AfmBOooRPluStSMjkyguHokJvnEMdU4-XpAeuUHS8AwGU5Qo34-Vz5BJ
    https://www.tomtek.eu/product/blade-steel-1-1274-aisi-1095/ https://www.amazon.com/Forging-Annealed-Supplies-Hobbyist-Professional/dp/B0CS2F4QVP
    https://forum.spyderco.com/viewtopic.php?t=95943 http://www.htsteelmill.com/1095-carbon-steel.html?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIieej-__YiwMV_oRLBR2VWCB4EAAYASAAEgL1L_D_BwE
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVH3xQCXdZQ
    And that's only the first page :-)
    You might want to watch :-)
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swkZgWWJ8yA




    It's like talking to a wall. I have a set of damascus steel knives that you dare not touch to your skin and yet they can be flexed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 21:21:50 2025
    On Mon Feb 24 00:19:43 2025 John B. wrote:
    On Sun, 23 Feb 2025 10:45:27 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 2/23/2025 10:22 AM, John B. wrote:

    You can heat treat 1095 to a hardness that it won't bend at all :-)
    (so much for "spring steel")

    I think you mean a hardness that will make it so brittle it will break >instead of permanently (plastically) bend. But it will bend elastically.

    O.K., I'll say it again, I, or anyone else who knows what they are
    doing can heat treat 1095 steel so that you cannot make it bend to any
    easily visible amount. I'll go even further, I can heat treat 1095 to
    the extent that when you quench the hot steel it will crack or break.




    You are speaking of a solid structure I think. Tubing acts a little differently. There is a point where it with deform that is between the elastic limit and the yield limits. In this area it need not return to its original shape imediately.

    Elasticity
    Elasticity is a property of an object or material indicating how it will restore it to its original shape after distortion.
    A spring is an example of an elastic object - when stretched, it exerts a restoring force which tends to bring it back to its original length. This restoring force is in general proportional to the stretch described by Hooke's Law.
    Hooke's Law
    It takes about twice as much force to stretch a spring twice as far. That linear dependence of displacement upon the stretching force is called Hooke's law and can be expressed as
    Fs = -k dL (4)
    where
    Fs = force in the spring (N)
    k = spring constant (N/m)
    dL = elongation of the spring (m)
    Note that Hooke's Law can also be applied to materials undergoing three dimensional stress (triaxial loading).
    Yield strength - y
    Yield strength is defined in engineering as the amount of stress (Yield point) that a material can undergo before moving from elastic deformation into plastic deformation.
    Yielding - a material deforms permanently
    The Yield Point is in mild- or medium-carbon steel the stress at which a marked increase in deformation occurs without increase in load. In other steels and in nonferrous metals this phenomenon is not observed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Tue Mar 4 21:43:43 2025
    On Sun Feb 23 08:52:41 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 2/22/2025 4:21 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 2/22/2025 4:06 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 19:58:29 GMT, cyclintom
    <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Fri Nov 8 14:03:46 2024 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    It doesn't exist, Tom. You can't pop a dent out a
    bicycle frame tube by
    riding the bike. Thinking you can is a sign of insanity.

    If you have a slight dent in high performance steel. the
    tubing can revert to its natural shape under stress.

    Tom. The only steel that might do that is spring steel
    (1095, 1060,
    1075, 1080, etc). Bicycle frames are not made from spring
    steel. If
    they were made from spring steel, they would ride like the
    proverbial
    wet noodle.

    So, what's the SAE/AISI number for such a spring steel
    bicycle frame
    and who is selling such bicycles?
    <https://www.azom.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=6151>
    Since you claim that you fixed the dent on YOUR bicycle,
    could I
    trouble you for the maker and model number of this bicycle
    so I can
    determine steel alloy that was used? Some photos of the
    dent, before
    and after, would also be nice.

    Note that I'm not talking about shape memory metal alloys:
    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape-memory_alloy>

    I'm also not talking about hydroforming, which doesn't
    work at
    removing dents in steel tubing without high pressure
    hydraulic
    assistance. It's commonly used for bending aluminum
    frames. You
    obviously don't have the necessary equipment in your
    garage workshop
    because you claimed that the dent popped out after simply
    riding the
    bicycle:
    <https://www.bikeforums.net/bicycle-mechanics/919494-ding-
    removal.html>

    Where the hell do you get off not knowing the properties
    of tempered steel and commenting on it?

    Frank, he's all yours now.
    Sorry, I'm going to disagree with you about spring steel.
    AFAIK there is _no_ steel that would spontaneously cure a
    dent in a bicycle tube from riding stresses. If the steel is
    dented, it's been stressed in that location beyond its yield
    point. There's no practical way for that to spontaneously
    reverse itself.

    While Andrew knows much more than I about the applicable
    shop techniques, I think you might be able to partially
    remove a dent in a tube if, like a seat tube, you had access
    to an open end. Perhaps forcing in a series of mandrels of
    increasing diameter could gradually force the dent outward.
    (Something similar is done to repair dents in the tubing of
    brass instruments like trumpets.) But I doubt it would give
    a perfect result, and I think cosmetic repair (maybe Bondo?)
    would be needed to get it really pretty.

    What Tom is describing is his usual mix of lying and fantasy
    and ignorance.


    Methods to form, or re form, steel are irrelevant here.

    The principle is that once you're beyond the elastic limit,
    the piece will have measurable deformation. That's a crystal
    slip, i.e., the structure of the material has changed.

    Regardless of human decisions after that (re form,
    cosmetically cover such as lead fill or bondo, replace the
    damaged piece, throw out the unit) the material has changed;
    it's not going to spontaneously pop back to pre-strain shape.



    Andrew, if you look at a framed house after it has sat there for awhile you will not see most of the hammer marks on the wood because there is a wide space betweed yield strength ad ellastic limit and in the cases of good framers, those limits are not
    exceeded. while the distance between those points is narrower with steel, they still exist. Don't be fooled into thinking that any deformation means the elastic limits have been exceeded or that if it doesn't rebound immediately yield strength has not
    been exceeded.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 18:51:58 2025
    On Wed Mar 5 11:45:08 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/5/2025 12:52 AM, AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/4/2025 10:30 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/4/2025 4:28 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    I have a set of damascus steel knives that you dare not touch to your >> skin and yet they can be flexed.

    Of course! No solid is perfectly rigid. All metals deform or "flex"
    when stress is applied. That has nothing much to do with your claims
    of magic tubing healing itself.



    A dent by definition is beyond the elastic limit.
    Right. I don't think Tom understands that.




    Frank,never actually working as an engineer, you have never developed the power of observation and are kissing Flunky's ass instead of actually looking into the science.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 18:49:05 2025
    On Tue Mar 4 23:52:41 2025 AMuzi wrote:
    On 3/4/2025 10:30 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/4/2025 4:28 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    I have a set of damascus steel knives that you dare not
    touch to your
    skin and yet they can be flexed.

    Of course! No solid is perfectly rigid. All metals deform or
    "flex" when stress is applied. That has nothing much to do
    with your claims of magic tubing healing itself.



    A dent by definition is beyond the elastic limit.




    Andrew, your implication is that if it doesn't return to it's shape instantly, it is beyond its yield strength. I used to think that before that dent disappeared. Obviously it was somewhere between a dent and the elastic limits of the metal.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:01:44 2025
    On Tue Mar 4 12:03:42 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 3/4/2025 12:44 AM, AMuzi wrote:

    For a typical dent, this Waterford for example: http://www.yellowjersey.org/wfd12a.jpg

    the tube is rolled to reform the greater part of the deformation:

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/wfd12b.jpg

    then the remaining low spots are filled with polyester bondo or with
    metal (brass, silver, lead. I use lead):

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/wfd12c.jpg

    and finished:

    http://www.yellowjersey.org/wfd12e.jpg

    Could you explain what's meant by "the tube is rolled"? As I said
    earlier, I'd thought the first step would be pushing a mandrel through
    (if the dent was in the seatpost) to partially push out the dent. Of
    course, that wouldn't work except on a seat tube, and I suppose would
    still require filling. Are you skipping that step entirely?

    BTW, my antique BMW has a slight dent in the top of the gas tank,
    apparently from something falling onto it. I've heard of "paintless dent repair" for car bodies and wondered about it, but never looked deeply
    into it. I gather that some skilled body workers can do pretty well at pushing dents back out from the underside.




    Have you got this now? Skilled body workers sometimes find a dent that they push on from the opposite side and the dent pops out. Wait a minute - you are all saying that is impossible.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:21:19 2025
    On Mon Feb 24 10:05:41 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:44:02 -0500, Zen Cycle <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On 2/22/2025 1:58 PM, cyclintom wrote:
    Who the hell does he think he's impressi9ng by saying
    that yhe didn't look down at down tube friction shifters in races

    I'm not impressing anyone, because no one else had to look down either.
    If one needed to look down to shift, they shouldn't be racing.

    My touring bicycle has downtube shifters. When I was riding it, I
    would look down before shifting at the start of the ride. After I
    became accustomed to its position, I didn't need to look down. If I
    adjusted the saddle or handlebars position, I had to start over. I
    assume that racers and pros do not tinker with these adjustments prior
    to a race and would therefore have the time needed to properly find
    the down tube shifters.

    In the my computer biz and piano pounding hobby, I've noticed that a
    fair number of people look at their hands instead of the computer
    screen or sheet music. I had both of these problems when I was first learning to type and play. I've partly fix the keyboard problem and
    can now type on the letter keys without looking at the keyboard.
    However, the rows of numbers, function keys and number pad are a lost
    cause. I have to look at those. The problem is that there are far
    too many different keyboard layouts. Recognizing the problem, I
    purchase about 10 Dell SK-81xx mechanical keyboards for use at home
    and in my former office. <https://www.google.com/search?q=dell%20sk-81%3F%3F&udm=2>
    I can now almost type with my eyes closed.

    With the piano, the problem was that I play almost totally by ear. No
    sheet music. Therefore, I had no incentive to learn to play by touch
    or with my eyes closed. I can play with my eyes closed on my Korg
    DSS-1 synthesizer, but not on any other piano, organ, etc: <https://www.google.com/search?q=korg%20dss-1&udm=2>

    What's happening is that people have varying degrees of hand-eye coordination. Some people can type or play piano with their eye's
    closed. Here's an example of one pianist who can play without looking
    at his hands:
    <https://www.youtube.com/@Lord_Vinheteiro/videos>
    For cycling, the trick is to reduce the number of variables to make
    shifting easier for the rider. That means don't move the saddle or
    shifters, large paddle handles, and lots of practice.




    Jeff, you didn't need to look down because you were riding in middle gears and not shifting much. You don't know anything about racing and are willing to believe that a 65 year old man who rides 1,500 miles a year can ride 2, 200 miles in one day twice
    at a 20 mph average on hilly roads.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:29:54 2025
    On Mon Feb 24 14:56:30 2025 Frank Krygowski wrote:
    On 2/24/2025 1:05 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 11:44:02 -0500, Zen Cycle <[email protected]> wrote:

    ... If one needed to look down to shift, they shouldn't be racing.

    My touring bicycle has downtube shifters. When I was riding it, I
    would look down before shifting at the start of the ride. After I
    became accustomed to its position, I didn't need to look down.

    Looking down is reasonable to see if one's friction shifters had the derailleur sideplates precisely clear of the chain and chainring before starting. I doubt anyone older than 11 needs to look down to find the
    levers.

    I don't look down to grab a water bottle out of its cage. It's always in
    the same position.

    ... I ... can now type on the letter keys without looking at the keyboard. However, the rows of numbers, function keys and number pad are a lost cause. I have to look at those.

    From time to time, I had enough numerical data to process that I taught myself to use the number pad without looking. It's not hard. (But its
    weird that telephone key pads are not the same layout as keyboard keypads.)

    What's happening is that people have varying degrees of hand-eye coordination. Some people can type or play piano with their eye's
    closed.

    Try playing fiddle or cello! There are no frets, so there's no visual
    markers to look at. Stopping the string against the fingerboard has to
    be done entirely by muscle memory and near instantaneous auditory
    correction, if necessary. On fiddle, it's most difficult when shifting
    upward from first position to play in a higher position. By comparison, guitar, clarinet, flute etc. are much easier, IME.




    There you have it from Franks lips to your ears - the professionals I consulted wh said that you ALWAYS looked down were incompetent fools while Frank is the real expert. When I raced friction shifters I always looked down and so did every other rider.
    This meant that you left a little more space in between you and the rider ahead of you.

    In fact, Frank doesn't even believe that STI was an advancement because it allowed you not to have to look down and so could draft much closer.

    It is amazing how expert a man is with a 7 speed freewheel friction shifter.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:33:47 2025
    On Mon Feb 24 12:57:55 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 24 Feb 2025 14:56:30 -0500, Frank Krygowski
    <[email protected]> wrote:

    From time to time, I had enough numerical data to process that I taught
    myself to use the number pad without looking. It's not hard. (But its
    weird that telephone key pads are not the same layout as keyboard keypads.)

    The first touch tone phone was introduced by Ma Bell (AT&T) in 1963.
    At the time, Ma Bell was doing everything possible to avoid being
    declared a vertically integrated monopoly, which owns every part of
    the business from components to equipment rentals. Ma Bell actually
    did own everything, but not the computer part of the business.

    Ma Bell had various methods of convincing the courts that they were
    not trying to extend their monopoly into the computer business. As
    long as Ma Bell was not selling or providing computer products or
    services, the illusion was maintained. The problem was that more
    things were being done at the CO's (central offices) and at the
    subscriber location by computers. The billing machines, switches,
    routing, etc were all done by devices closely resembling computers. Ma
    Bell's strategy was to rename everything that could possibly be
    considered a computer to some other less risky name. AT&T also made
    an effort to design the subscriber equipment to NOT look or function
    like a computer. The problem was that calculators were far older than
    touch tone dials. Therefore, the Ma Bell touch tone dial pad was
    re-arranged so that it still functioned for dialing, but would drive
    the subscriber (user) insane if they tried to use it as a calculator
    or switch back and forth between the layouts.

    There are also some other theories on why there's a difference: <https://www.vcalc.net/keyboard.htm>




    Good lord Jeff, can you never stop while you're behind? Bell Telephone constructed NONE of their computerized switching. That was done at IBM in south San Jose.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:45:51 2025
    On Mon Mar 3 14:59:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:27:02 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sat Feb 22 13:13:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:36:11 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an
    exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    Sorry, I wasn't very clear. The above sentence should be:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and were probably
    NOT working as an exempt employee, professional, manager, executive,
    or consultant.

    I will ask you again: since the only job you ever worked, the supervisor would not even give you a recommendation, what in hell gives you the idea that you know ANYTHING about working?

    That's easy. A sure sign that I know something about working is that employers, clients and companies were willing to pay me do things for
    them. The following are some things that gave me the idea that I know something about working for a living:

    1. One house without a mortgage.
    2. Social Security payments based on my past income.
    3. One 24 year old automobile without a mortgage.
    4. A continuing demand for my services after my retirement.
    5. A bank account with sufficient cash to hopefully will survive the
    antics of our fearless leader.
    6. Whatever else I forgot.

    I will ask you again: What maker and model bicycle were you riding
    when your amazing frame tubing magically repaired a dent by simply
    riding the bicycle? I want to read about this magic tubing.




    Will you stop it with the bullshit? You have a home without a mortgage because of the small inheritance your father left you. And it was dirt cheap and when you bought it, it was in the middle of nowhere with ultra-cheap property values. What makes you
    think that you can lie your way out of a life full of mistakes?

    I am STILL getting calls to work despite being retired for the last 17 years. And contrary to Flunky's tearful claims it is HR departments sending me requests.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 19:54:25 2025
    On Tue Mar 4 08:35:53 2025 Zen Cycle wrote:
    On 3/3/2025 5:59 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:27:02 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sat Feb 22 13:13:40 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:36:11 -0800, Jeff Liebermann <[email protected]> >>> wrote:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an >>>> exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    Sorry, I wasn't very clear. The above sentence should be:

    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and were probably
    NOT working as an exempt employee, professional, manager, executive,
    or consultant.

    I will ask you again: since the only job you ever worked, the supervisor would not even give you a recommendation, what in hell gives you the idea that you know ANYTHING about working?

    That's easy. A sure sign that I know something about working is that employers, clients and companies were willing to pay me do things for
    them. The following are some things that gave me the idea that I know something about working for a living:

    1. One house without a mortgage.
    2. Social Security payments based on my past income.
    3. One 24 year old automobile without a mortgage.
    4. A continuing demand for my services after my retirement.
    5. A bank account with sufficient cash to hopefully will survive the antics of our fearless leader.
    6. Whatever else I forgot.

    I will ask you again: What maker and model bicycle were you riding
    when your amazing frame tubing magically repaired a dent by simply
    riding the bicycle? I want to read about this magic tubing.


    I'm more interested in this million dollar investment than he's had for
    5 years and is still only worth a million - even though he's allegedly
    making 10-14K a month on it for these 5 years.




    I GAVE $60,000 to my brothers, I eat at restaurants almost every night including some pretty pricey one's that you can see on Check Please, Bay Area. In order to protect my investments from any possible recession I have moved from growth stocks into fuds
    like Govertrnment bonds which pay low interest rates rather than growth.

    And I still have increased my investments to over $1.1 Million. You on the other hand think that you couldn't possibly have any money unless you're throwing it to the 4 winds.

    Too bad that I don't have to worry for a second about my retirement while any company that would allow you to do no work at all is not long for this world.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 5 20:04:32 2025
    On Mon Mar 3 14:31:41 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:
    On Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:17:26 GMT, cyclintom <[email protected]>
    wrote:

    On Sat Feb 22 12:36:11 2025 Jeff Liebermann wrote:

    Having the boss monitor you with a stopwatch is characteristic of a
    job where you are paid by the millisecond. That sometimes works with
    hourly employees. However, it doesn't apply to salaried professional
    or exempt employees who are more commonly paid by the job and not by
    the millisecond:
    <https://www.investopedia.com/terms/e/exempt-employee.asp>
    If you "never worked one job where a boss didn't demand full
    attention", you were likely NOT receiving a salary and working as an
    exempt employee, professional, manager, executive, or consultant.

    I also find it odd the you wrote "a boss" instead of "my boss" or "my
    manager". Hourly employees might have one of more managers. Salaried
    professionals usually have a single manager, even if you worked for a
    committee.

    At one company, the chief engineer would walk around the lab and
    remark "am I paying you for this" if he saw anyone doing something he
    considered not job related. Eventually, he was asked by the other
    managers to stop doing that because it was highly disruptive and
    usually resulted in work coming to a screeching halt.

    Jeff, what do you know about real jobs?

    Not much. I worked in various real jobs and consulting gigs after
    graduating from college in 1971: <https://www.linkedin.com/in/jeff-liebermann-151823/details/experience/> After 1984, I opened my own computer service and consulting business
    and worked profitably ever after until I retired in 2021.

    Were you able to recall what you did in the 17 years between leaving
    the USAF in 1967:

    11/02/2021 <https://groups.google.com/g/rec.bicycles.tech/c/MyPJ4MA3e60/m/-TZfbH7xAQAJ> "I was born in October of 1944. I joined at 17.5 Those with the
    ability to add would assume that I joined the Air Force in May of
    1961. 4 years of active duty and two years inactive liable to be
    recalled would to most people mean that I got off of active duty in
    1965 and finished my service of the Air Force in 1967."

    and your return to a real job at Thoratec Laboratories in 1984? <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tom-kunich-22012/details/experience/>

    (I like your "Those with the ability to add...", where you insult the
    reading and arithmetic abilities of your audience).

    BTW, did you ever find or reconstruct your 14 page resume which you
    claim was erased from your computer by a malicious computer
    technician?




    Ahh, the Liebermann pretence that he held a real job other than the QC job you held for a couple od years and offended so many people that they wouldn't even give you a recommendation.

    Stop saying one thing and then another. IF you worked at all of these jobs where is your resume? Where are your leters of recommendation?

    Now I have both and have provided them and said that the Resume was incomplete because HR departmentds preferred one or two page resumke's with the most important work. But you can pretend otherwise. It sure as hell doesn't bother me.

    When I wanted a Mercury Milan with very low milage (after a year it just clicked over to 59,000 miles) I drove up to Sacramento and bought it for cash. It is faster than most other cars on the road and makes 33 mpg on the freeway. And it looks better
    than most new cars. That's a whole lot better than a rusted out pickup truck.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 30 19:26:54 2025
    On Sat Aug 30 17:21:23 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:

    Consider how often you?ve misunderstood/remembered things which you?ve then just repeated.

    And one can read back his comments and look at Strava etc.

    This is a Tom problem as ever!




    Roger you've said that many times before but you've never quoted me saying anything about Flunky that he didn't say himself. In case you're unaware of it, you can erase postings on Strava so your pretense that looking on Strava proves anything is a false
    belief.

    Why haven't you made any comments about the "races" that Flunky claims to have done that are virtual "races" that are preposterous?

    I'm perfectoly willing to give credit to Flunky for the things he actually has done. But there isn't anything that he has done that he will not exaggerate completely out of proportion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 1 16:34:19 2025
    On Sat Aug 30 23:04:34 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Sat Aug 30 17:21:23 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:

    Consider how often you?ve misunderstood/remembered things which you?ve then
    just repeated.

    And one can read back his comments and look at Strava etc.

    This is a Tom problem as ever!




    Roger you've said that many times before but you've never quoted me
    saying anything about Flunky that he didn't say himself. In case you're unaware of it, you can erase postings on Strava so your pretense that looking on Strava proves anything is a false belief.

    Why haven't you made any comments about the "races" that Flunky claims to have done that are virtual "races" that are preposterous?

    I'm perfectoly willing to give credit to Flunky for the things he
    actually has done. But there isn't anything that he has done that he will not exaggerate completely out of proportion.


    He isn?t the one telling fishermen tails about his fitness etc, his Strava etc support that he?s a fit guy who races, your the one who brought in unsupported claims neither he or anyone else ?remembers? him claiming any
    of these things, this is very much a you thing.




    Roger, why don't you listen to what he really says? He's in his 60's and the only racing he has dome in many years is "virtual". He has claimed that he has average speeds up oin the 20's and I showed you the chart showing that people in their 60's cannot
    ride average speedd like 20 year olds.

    I am not complaining about the things he actually does - but the fake claims of things he is presently doing. After all - he actually rides bikes if you can believe him and many people his age have given up.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?Y3ljbGludG9t?=@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 1 16:27:29 2025
    On Sun Aug 31 08:05:12 2025 zen cycle wrote:
    On 8/30/2025 7:04 PM, Roger Merriman wrote:
    cyclintom <[email protected]> wrote:
    On Sat Aug 30 17:21:23 2025 Roger Merriman wrote:

    Consider how often you?ve misunderstood/remembered things which you?ve then
    just repeated.

    And one can read back his comments and look at Strava etc.

    This is a Tom problem as ever!




    Roger you've said that many times before but you've never quoted me
    saying anything about Flunky that he didn't say himself.

    Oh, like you claimed I said I was a production engineer, a manufacturing engineer, a QC engineer, or that I lived in New hampshire? Hint, sparky:
    I never claimed any of those things, Those were all figments of your imagination

    In case you're
    unaware of it, you can erase postings on Strava so your pretense that
    looking on Strava proves anything is a false belief.

    Tommy, There were never any postings on my strava account of a 200 mile
    ride. They weren't erased because they were never there to begin with.

    Why haven't you made any comments about the "races" that Flunky claims to >> have done that are virtual "races" that are preposterous?

    Probably because a) the claims are true, Zwift proves that*, and 2) they aren't preposterous. Virtual racing is now an annual UCI sanctioned
    event. BTW - Jay Vine, who won the UCI Esports Worl Championships in
    2022 is currently leasing the Vuelta a Espa a KOM standings (end of the first week today).


    I'm perfectoly willing to give credit to Flunky for the things he
    actually has done.

    no, actually, you're not, and you never have.

    But there isn't anything that he has done that he will
    not exaggerate completely out of proportion.

    Name one thing I've ever claimed I did in this forum that was "out of proportion".

    I have no idea where you dreamed up this ridiculous fiction about me
    doing two-hundred mile rides. The the fact that I would ever even
    attempt to post such a thing fails the basic logic test - People I've
    ridden and raced with for decades follow me on Strava. If I were to post
    such a ride, they would be the first ones to call me out, they know
    rides over 4 hours aren't something I do. They also know what I'm
    capable of, and something as ridiculous as a two hundred mile ride at a
    20 mph average would be something they would immediately know was bogus. Unlike you, these are people I respect and in two cases consider my
    mentors when I started racing in the 1980s.

    Why would I be ashamed of something from a loudmouth asshole I've never
    met on the other side the country when I see and ride with the people
    that follow me on strava an a regular basis. Does it make any sense the
    I would deleted such a ridiculous fantasy ride because a piece of shit
    like _you_ doubted it? Get over yourself.

    No, tommy, this is something you dreamed up from somewhere that has no
    basis in any fact of plane of reality.




    You don't hve to claim anyuthing. I wouldn't believe you if you did. If you can play all day on a newsgroup you do not have an important job. Rather you have a job were someone else does the work and you're nothing more than a signature on the paperwork.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)